Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 45(8): 707-728.e9, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32591175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Comparison between studies assessing outcomes after surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) has proven to be difficult owing to variations in outcome reporting. This study aimed to identify outcomes and outcome measures used to evaluate postoperative results for CuTS. METHODS: We performed computerized database searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Studies with 20 or more patients aged 18 and older who were undergoing medial epicondylectomy, endoscopic decompression, open simple decompression, or decompression with subcutaneous, submuscular, or intramuscular transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow were included. Outcomes and outcome measures were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS: Of the 101 studies included, 45 unique outcomes and 31 postoperative outcome measures were identified. These included 7 condition-specific, clinician-reported instruments; 4 condition-specific, clinician-reported instruments; 8 patient-reported, generic instruments; 11 clinician-generated instruments; and one utility measure. Outcome measures were divided into 6 unique domains. Overall, 60% of studies used condition-specific outcome measures. The frequency of any condition-specific outcome measure ranged from 1% to 37% of included studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked heterogeneity in outcomes and outcome measures used to assess CuTS. A standardized core outcome set is needed to compare results of various techniques of cubital tunnel decompression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study builds on the existing literature to support the notion that there is marked heterogeneity in outcomes and outcome measures used to assess CuTS. The authors believe that a future standardized set of core outcomes is needed to limit heterogeneity among studies assessing postoperative outcomes in CuTS to compare these interventions more easily and pool results in the form of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.


Subject(s)
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome , Humans , Cubital Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Decompression, Surgical , Lumbar Vertebrae , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Treatment Outcome , Ulnar Nerve/surgery
2.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 45(5): 513-520, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009497

ABSTRACT

This systematic review summarizes the outcome reporting standards in Dupuytren's disease treatment research. A search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and CINAHL was conducted. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series published between 1997 and 2017, investigating treatment of Dupuytren's disease with fasciectomy, fasciotomy, or collagenase, were eligible for inclusion. Range of motion was the most commonly reported outcome, appearing in 77% of included studies. Outcomes, such as range of motion, recurrence, and clinical success, were frequently defined, however many different definitions were used. We identified 37 unique measurement methods for range of motion, 28 for recurrence, and 25 for clinical success. Most outcomes were assessed at multiple time points, and only a few studies reported results according to established clinical significance thresholds. Development of a core outcome set will help standardize outcome reporting, and ensure future research in this field is relevant, interpretable, and amenable to systematic review and/or meta-analysis.


Subject(s)
Dupuytren Contracture , Dupuytren Contracture/surgery , Fasciotomy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Range of Motion, Articular , Treatment Outcome
3.
Aesthet Surg J ; 40(4): 383-391, 2020 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty remains critical to the treatment of breast hypertrophy. No technique has been shown to be superior; however, comparison between studies is difficult due to variation in outcome reporting. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to identify a comprehensive list of outcomes and outcome measures in reduction mammaplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive computerized search was performed. Included studies were randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials involving at least 100 cases of female breast hypertrophy and patients of all ages who underwent 1 or more defined reduction mammaplasty technique. Outcomes and outcome measures were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS: A total 106 articles were eligible for inclusion; 57 unique outcomes and 16 outcome measures were identified. Frequency of patient-reported and author-reported outcomes were 44% and 88%, respectively. Postoperative complications were the most frequently reported outcome (82.2%). Quality-of-life outcomes were accounted for in 37.7% of studies. Outcome measures were either condition-specific or generic; frequencies were as low as 1% and as high as 5.6%. Five scales were formally assessed in the breast reduction populations. Clinical measures were defined in 15.1% of studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked heterogeneity in reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in the literature. A standardized outcome set is needed to compare outcomes of various reduction mammaplasty techniques.


Subject(s)
Mammaplasty , Breast/surgery , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy/surgery , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality of Life
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(3): 813-818, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29965918

ABSTRACT

The topic of ethics in plastic surgery remains underrepresented in the literature. By applying the four principles of biomedical ethics-respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice-as described by Beauchamp and Childress to proposed ethical scenarios, this article attempts to provide plastic surgeons with a systematic approach to recognize and address ethical dilemmas as they present in day-to-day practice. Through the perspective of an experienced plastic surgeon and medical ethicist, this article is intended to spark discussion, reflection, and debate on ethical challenges in plastic surgery.


Subject(s)
Beneficence , Ethics, Medical , Respect , Social Justice , Surgery, Plastic/ethics , Female , Humans , Male , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/ethics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods
6.
J Hand Surg Am ; 43(7): 684.e1-684.e4, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29459170

ABSTRACT

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy is characterized by severe, proximal upper extremity weakness including an inability to abduct the shoulder and flex the elbow. Treatment using both medical and surgical decompression approaches has produced variable results. This paper reports the use of nerve transfers (spinal accessory to suprascapular, flexor carpi ulnaris fascicle of ulnar to biceps motor branch, radial nerve branch to triceps to axillary) to restore shoulder and elbow function in a case of unilateral cervical spondylotic amyotrophy involving C5 and C6 myotomes. Evidence of regeneration was observed on electromyography as well as clinically at 5 months postoperatively. At 3 years after surgery, recovery of elbow flexion and shoulder abduction was Medical Research Council grade 4/5 with improved external rotation and considerably improved patient-rated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores. We propose that nerve transfers be considered along with other reconstruction modalities in the treatment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy.


Subject(s)
Muscular Atrophy/surgery , Nerve Transfer/methods , Spondylosis/surgery , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Electromyography , Humans , Male , Muscle Weakness/physiopathology , Muscle Weakness/surgery , Muscular Atrophy/physiopathology , Nerve Regeneration , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Spondylosis/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...