Lactate during ex-situ heart perfusion does not predict the requirement for mechanical circulatory support following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplants.

BACKGROUND: Ex-situ heart perfusion (ESHP) is commonly used for the reanimation and preservation of hearts following donation after circulatory determined death (DCD). The only commercially available existing ESHP device promotes perfusate lactate levels for assessment of heart viability. The reliability of this marker is yet to be confirmed for DCD heart transplantation. METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective study examining DCD heart transplants from March 1, 2015 to June 30, 2020. Recipients were divided into 2 groups dependent upon their requirement for or absence of mechanical circulatory support post-transplant. Lactate profiles obtained during ESHP were analyzed. Hearts were procured using the direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) method. RESULTS: Fifty-one DCD heart transplant recipients were studied, of which 20 (39%) were dependent on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) following transplantation, (2% Ventricular Assist Device (VAD), 16% Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and 21% Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP). There was no difference in arterial lactate profiles on ESHP at any time point for those dependent upon MCS support (MCS) and those that were not (no MCS) post-transplant. After 3 hours of ESHP, the arterial lactate was >5mmol/L in 80% upon MCS vs 62% no MCS, p = .30. There was also no difference in ESHP rising arterial lactate concentrations, (15% MCS vs 13% non MCS, p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: For DCD hearts transplants retrieved using the DPP technique, lactate profiles do not seem to be a reliable predictor of mechanical circulatory support requirement post-transplant.

Pediatric heart transplantation following donation after circulatory death, distant procurement, and ex-situ perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Limited availability of suitable donor hearts remains a challenge to pediatric heart transplantation, contributing to waitlist mortality. Controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) has demonstrated success in adults. Early series of pediatric DCD heart transplantation using cold storage alone reported significant early mortality. We report a collaboration between 2 centers in the United Kingdom, combining expertise in adult DCD organ retrieval and pediatric transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective series comprises 6 children (4 male, all >20 kg) undergoing DCD heart transplantation at Great Ormond Street Hospital between 1 February and 30 September 2020, following retrieval with direct procurement and perfusion using portable normothermic machine perfusion by the Royal Papworth Hospital service. Baseline characteristics and 1-year follow-up were compared to 9 children who underwent donation after brain death (DBD) transplants contemporaneously. RESULTS: Mean DCD donor age was 24.67 years and mean DCD recipient age was 13.83 years. Mean functional warm ischemic time was 28.5 minutes and ex-situ heart perfusion time was 280 minutes. Median ICU and hospital stay were 9 and 17 days, respectively. All children survived to 1-year post-transplant. Survival and ICU and hospital stay were similar between the DCD and DBD cohorts. Performing DCD transplants resulted in a 66.7% increase in transplants for children >20 kg at GOSH during the study. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that DCD heart transplant can be performed safely with excellent short-term survival in children. Although the cohort is small, there was no significant difference in major outcomes compared to a DBD cohort.

A 5-year single-center early experience of heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death donors.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to address the increasing demand for heart transplantation within the United Kingdom (UK), we established a clinical program of heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death (DCD) donors in 2015. After 5 years, we report the clinical early outcomes and impact of the program. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, matched, observational cohort study comparing outcomes of hearts transplanted from DCD donors from March 1, 2015 to February 29, 2020 with those from matched donation after brain death (DBD) donors at Royal Papworth Hospital (RPH) (Cambridge, UK). DCD hearts were either retrieved using thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion or the direct procurement and perfusion technique. All DBD hearts were procured using standard cold static storage. The primary outcomes were recipient 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS: During the 5-year study, DCD heart donation increased overall heart transplant activity by 48% (79 for DCD and 164 for DBD). There was no difference in survival at 30 days (97% for DCD vs 99% for DBD, p = 1.00) or 1 year (91% for DCD vs 89% for DBD, p = 0.72). There was no difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (7 for DCD vs 6 for DBD days, p = 0.24) or in the hospital (24 for DCD vs 25 for DBD days, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: DCD heart donation increased overall heart transplant activity at RPH by 48%, with no difference in 30-day or 1-year survival in comparison with conventional DBD heart transplantations. DCD heart donation is set to make a dramatic difference in the number of patients who can benefit from heart transplantation.