Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Experience with Social Determinants of Health.

The role that social determinants of health (SDHs) play in athletic healthcare is gaining attention, yet little is known about athletic trainers' (ATs) perceptions of and encounters with the impact of SDHs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ATs' perceptions of various SDHs and their experience treating patients whose health and well-being were influenced by SDHs. This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey completed by 1694 ATs (completion rate = 92.6%; 61.1% female; age = 36.6 ± 10.8 years). The survey consisted of several multipart questions focusing on specific SDHs. Descriptive statistics were used to report frequencies and percentages. Results indicated widespread agreement that SDHs matter to patient health and are of concern in athletic healthcare. The SDHs that ATs most commonly reported encountering included lifestyle choices (n = 1306/1406; 93.0%), social support (n = 1185/1427; 83.0%), income (n = 1167/1502; 77.7%), and access to quality and timely healthcare (n = 1093/1420, 77.0%). The SDHs that ATs least commonly reported having experience with was governmental policy (n = 684/1411; 48%). The perceived importance of SDHs among ATs and their commonly reported experiences managing patient cases in which SDHs negatively influence patients' health and healthcare suggest that efforts to assess these factors are needed so that strategies to address their influence on athletic healthcare can be identified.

Preventive Training Program Feedback Complexity, Movement Control, and Performance in Youth Athletes.

CONTEXT: Preventive training programs (PTPs) reduce injury risk by improving movement control. Corrective feedback is important; however, many cues at once may be too complicated for athletes. OBJECTIVE: To compare movement control and long-jump (LJ) changes in youth athletes participating in a season-long PTP, with simplified feedback, traditional feedback, or a warmup of the coaches' choosing. DESIGN: Cluster-randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Soccer fields. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 420 athletes (simplified feedback = 173, traditional feedback = 118, and control = 129; age = 11 ± 3 years). INTERVENTION(S): Teams were randomized into the simplified PTP, traditional PTP, or control group. Simplified and traditional PTPs lasted 10 to 12 minutes and used the same exercises. The simplified PTP provided only sagittal-plane feedback (eg, "get low"), and the traditional PTP provided feedback targeting all motion planes (eg, "don't let your knees cave inward"). Research assistants administered the PTP warmups 2 to 3 times/week for the season. Control team coaches chose and ran their own warmup strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed 4 sessions (preseason [PRE], postseason [POST] at approximately 8 weeks after PRE, retention 1 [R1] at 6 weeks postseason, and retention 2 [R2] at 12 weeks postseason). They performed 3 trials of a jump-landing task, which was evaluated using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) and 2 recorded standing LJ trials at each test session. A time series panel was used to evaluate group differences across time points for the LESS and LJ. RESULTS: Change score analyses revealed improvements in the LESS score from PRE to POST for all groups. Improvements from PRE were retained at R1 and R2 for the intervention groups (simplified and traditional). The traditional group demonstrated better LJ performance at POST (P < .001) and R1 (P = .049) than the simplified or control group. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified cues were as effective as traditional cues in improving LESS scores from PRE to POST season. Participating in PTPs, regardless of their complexity, likely provides movement benefits.

Epidemiology of Patients with Dance-Related Injuries Presenting to Emergency Departments in the United States, 2014-2018.

BACKGROUND: Updated rates and patterns associated with patients with dance-related injuries reporting to US emergency departments (EDs) is needed. HYPOTHESIS: Between the years 2014 and 2018, there will be an observed rise of patients with dance-related injuries seen within US EDs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: Utilizing the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database, data were abstracted for all structured dance-related injuries for all people who presented to a NEISS participating hospital from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Data were abstracted on age, sex, race, disposition, location on the body where the injury happened, and free text box regarding the mechanism and nature of the injury. Each patient case was associated with a weight to provide national incidence rate (per 100,000) estimates. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize counts, percentages, and rates across patient cases. RESULTS: Between years 2014 and 2018, 4152 patients reported to the NEISS EDs with a dance-related injury. Most injuries occurred in female patients (83.3%; n = 3459) and among those who were 10 to 18 years old (76.2%; n = 3164). The most common injuries were ankle sprain/strain (12.7%; n = 527) and knee sprain/strain (10.4%; n = 431). Almost all patients were treated and released (97.1%; n = 4033). These data yielded population-weighted estimates of 125,618 injuries for the study period, with an increasing trend over time (19.2% increase over 5 years). Incidence rates were over 4 times higher for female (12.4) than for male patients (3.0) and highest in the 10- to 18-year-old age group (incidence rate = 46.4). CONCLUSION: Patients with dance-related injuries reporting to EDs increased over a 5-year period from 2014 to 2018. The majority of dancers in the study were female patients, between the ages of 10 and 18 years, nearly half of the patients reported to the ED with a sprain/strain, and almost all patients were treated and released. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An increase in access to proper injury prevention medical services and education should be provided to female dancers between the ages of 10 and 18 years. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY: B.

The reported pain coping strategies of pediatric burn survivors-does a correlation exist between coping style and development of anxiety disorder?

Unresolved pediatric pain, both acute and chronic, has been associated with negative short- and long-term physical and mental health outcomes. This study sought to determine whether an association existed between self-reported pain coping skills and anxiety levels in a cohort of pediatric burn patients, and whether gender would influence their responses. The sample comprised burn-injured children in attendance at one of three mature burn camp sites. The self-report measures utilized included the 41-item Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders Child Version and the 39-item Pain Coping Questionnaire. Parental consent was obtained. A psychologist administered the measures. Participants included 187 youth, mean age 12.4 ± 2.4 years, girls (n = 89) boys (n = 98) with 67% reporting visible burn scars. Among boys, the use of Internalizing Coping Strategies was moderately correlated with elevated scores on Panic Disorder symptoms (r = .42, P < .001). Among girls, the use of Internalizing Coping Strategies was associated with elevated Generalized Anxiety (r = .51, P < .001), Panic Disorder (r = .46, P < .001), and Total Anxiety Symptom Scores (r = .49, P < .001). Those children who reported using Behavioral Distraction Strategies did not have any elevated anxiety scores. These findings suggest that burn-injured children, who employ Internalization as their pain coping strategy, may be more vulnerable to the development of long-term anxiety disorder, which, if left untreated may result in a negative psycho/social outcome. Applicability to Practice: Assessment of in-patient pediatric patients with the Pain Coping Questionnaire may help to identify children who are more likely to experience long-term anxiety. Future studies should seek to confirm these findings and determine whether improved pain management and early treatment of anxiety can help to diminish the long-term implications of unhelpful pain strategies and increased anxiety in burn-injured children.

Measuring the burden of pediatric burn injury for parents and caregivers: informed burn center staff can help to lighten the load.

This study sought to identify which commonly experienced burn-related issues parents/caregivers of burn-injured youth deemed most stressful, difficult, and disruptive during their child's initial acute burn care hospitalization, and following the child's discharge. Parents completed an 11-item survey, asking them to rate the difficulty of items regarding their child's burn injury. The scale was created by burn doctors, nurses, and psychologists with an average of 10.5 (SD ± 4.8) years of experience. Items selected were among common parental problems reported in the burn literature. Respondents included 69 parents/caregivers of previously hospitalized, burn-injured youth. The majority were mothers, n = 51 (74%), and n = 34 (49%) were Caucasian. The most represented age group was 37 to 45 years, n = 31 (45%). Children were on average, 6.04 years out from their initial injury. All parents reported their child's pain as the most difficult part of the injury, n = 69 (100%). The second most common issue was the child's first hospital stay. The other two items found to be "very hard" or "pretty hard" were the time spent away from their other children, and feelings of hopelessness in being unable to fix everything for their child. In this study, key parental problems occurred during the child's initial hospitalization. Burn staff cannot alleviate all problems, however, staff education regarding distressing problems faced by parents, as well as possible solutions, can be made available.

Comparison of three rating scales as outcome measures for treatment trials of depression in Alzheimer disease: findings from DIADS.

CONTEXT: Major depression affects about 25% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has serious adverse consequences for patients as well as caregivers. Studies of treatments for depression in AD, like most treatment studies, depend on the ability of the scales used to measure outcome to detect a difference between the effects of treatment and control, particularly in trials conducted over waves. OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of three depression scales, and some of their subscales, to detect the difference in the effects of drug (treatment) and placebo (control). DESIGN: Comparison of three scales of depression in terms of percent variance explained as indicated by the adjusted or partial eta-squared for the effect of drug versus placebo, controlling for baseline depression, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, 12-week, clinical trial of sertraline for the treatment of depression with AD. SETTING: University outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and Major Depressive Episode. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and the Neuropsychiatric-Inventory Mood Domains (NPI-M). RESULTS: Examination of the treatment effects as indicated by the partial eta-squared's for each scale at each wave, revealed a slight, but not significant, advantage for the use of the CSDD over the HDRS, and a significant advantage for the use of either of these over the NPI-M. Treatment effects, as reflected in the partial eta-squared's computed for the subscales at each wave, were significant for all four subscales, and were largest for the CSDD 'mood' subscale although they were not significantly greater than for the other subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The CSDD, and particularly its mood subscale, appears to be more sensitive than the HDRS, it's subscales or the NPI-M, for comparing drug to placebo in treating major depression in AD patients. Treatment effects as reflected in the partial eta-squared's were largest on the CSDD mood subscale and increased over time. The pattern for the other subscales was non-monotonic over waves and resembled the pattern for the entire scale. Perhaps combining the CSDD two subscales obscures the treatment effects for the separate subscales.