1.
Int J Prosthodont
; 2(3): 217-23, 1989.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-2699418
ABSTRACT
The microleakage of indirect porcelain and direct composite resin-bonded inlays was compared with that of posterior composite resin restorations using Class II preparations of extracted molar teeth. The resin-bonded inlay restorations provided a better marginal seal at the cervical restoration/dentin interface than did the composite resin restoration. The efficacy of this marginal seal varied with the particular treatments and materials used. Resin-bonded porcelain inlays had a higher incidence of cervical excess from the composite resin luting agent than did the posterior composite resin restorations.
Subject(s)
Composite Resins , Dental Porcelain , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Inlays , Dental Bonding/methods , Humans , Molar
2.
Quintessence Dent Technol
; 10(6): 361-5, 1986 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-3526417
Subject(s)
Dental Articulators , Dental Equipment , Dental Occlusion , Jaw Relation Record , Denture Design , Humans
3.
Quintessence Dent Technol
; 10(1): 17-21, 1986 Jan.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-3513263
4.
Dent Tech
; 38(4 Suppl): 5-8, 1985 Apr.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-3858177
Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Crowns , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Methylmethacrylates , Models, Dental , Dental Materials
5.
Nature
; 244(5413): 237-8, 1973 Jul 27.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-4583100