Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Head Neck ; 38(4): 499-505, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25445257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to validate the consensus recommendation and assess dosimetric significance of selective omission of nodal level V from intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) clinical target volume (CTV) for oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS: IMRT plans and clinical outcomes for 112 patients with oropharyngeal cancer (nodal classification N0-N2b) were analyzed for coverage of ipsilateral and contralateral nodal level V. Additionally, new IMRT plans were generated in 6 randomly selected patients to assess its dosimetric impact. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 3.4 years, there were no failures identified in nodal level V with or without nodal level V omission. Upon dosimetric evaluation, significant reduction in integral dose, V10 Gy , V20 Gy , V30 Gy , V40 Gy , and V50 Gy was observed by excluding unilateral and bilateral level V from the CTV. CONCLUSION: We clinically validate the consensus recommendation for selective omission of level V nodal coverage in IMRT planning of patients with oropharyngeal cancer and demonstrate significant dosimetric advantages.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lymph Nodes/radiation effects , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/secondary , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiometry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...