Long-term effect of acidic pH on the surface microhardness of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, Biodentine, and total fill root repair material putty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness values of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and total fill root repair material (TF-RRM) Putty at varying pH and times. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this laboratory experiment, materials were mixed and placed in cylinder blocks with internal dimensions of 6 mm × 4 mm. Ten samples of each material were soaked in buffered solutions of butyric acid with 4.4, 5.4, 6.4, and 7.4 pH values and stored at 37°C in 100% humidity. The samples were submitted to the microhardness test at the end of 1 week and then 1 month. Multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were carried out to compare the mean values at a significance level of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Low pH caused a significant decrease in the microhardness values of all samples. Surface microhardness increased with time (P < 0.0001). The microhardness values of Biodentine were significantly greater than those of ProRoot MTA and TF-RRM putty (P < 0.0001). The lowest microhardness values were recorded for TF-RRM putty groups regardless of the pH of the environment and the evaluation time. CONCLUSION: An acidic environment impaired the surface microhardness of all root repair materials tested. Overall, the mean surface microhardness of TF-RRM Putty was lower than those of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Biodentine showed the greatest microhardness values at all pH values, regardless of the evaluation time.

Comparison of apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using 4 different root canal irrigation techniques.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite delivered with a 27-G needle, self-adjusting file (SAF), passive ultrasonic irrigation, or the EndoVac system (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) during the instrumentation and final irrigation of root canals. METHODS: Matched paired single-canal teeth were divided into 8 groups. The experimental groups were needle irrigation size #30 (NI30) and #50 (NI50), SAF size #30 (SAF30) and #50 (SAF50), passive ultrasonic irrigation size #30 (PUI30) and #50 (PUI50), and EndoVac size #30 (EV30) and #50 (EV50). Teeth were embedded in 0.2% agarose gel (pH = 7.4) containing 1 mL 0.1% m-Cresol purple (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), which changes color at a pH level of 9.0. Root canals were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA using 4 different techniques, and the amount of irrigant was controlled. Standardized digital photographs were taken 20 minutes after the first irrigant was used and were analyzed to determine the amount of extrusion (expressed as a percentage of total pixels). RESULTS: The amounts of apical extrusion obtained in the NI30, NI50, SAF30, SAF50, PUI30, PUI50, EV30, and EV50 groups were 30% (3/10), 50% (5/10), 20% (2/10), 70% (7/10), 40% (4/10), 40% (4/10), 10% (1/10), and 10% (1/10), respectively. The overall extrusion frequency, regardless of the apical preparation size, was 40% (8/20) for needle, 45% (9/20) for SAF, 40% (8/20) for ultrasonic irrigation, and 10% (2/20) for EndoVac. Although the SAF group showed more extrusion, the percentage of pixels was significantly higher in the needle irrigation group (P < .01). The EndoVac group showed significantly lower extrusion values than the other techniques in terms of the number of teeth and pixels (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of apical extrusion is significantly lower with the EndoVac in comparison with the 3 other techniques.

Oral complaints of denture-wearing elderly people living in two nursing homes in Istanbul, Turkey.

AIM: The aim of this study was to observe and determine oral complaints of people aged 55 years or older, living in two nursing homes in Istanbul, Turkey, and their satisfaction with their complete or partial dentures by means of a simple questionnaire. METHODS: Two old people's homes (one public and one private) in the district of Uskudar in Istanbul agreed to take part in this study. All residents who were available were invited to answer a piloted nine-point questionnaire with questions on age, gender, physical problems, eating, and communication, aesthetic denture wearing and psychological problems. The questions were asked in person by one investigator. The resulting data were entered into SPSS version 15. RESULTS: Out of a total of 210 residents, 130 (61.9%) took part in the study, of whom 53% (n=71) of residents were living in the private nursing home and 60% (n=81) were female. One hundred and five (80%) were denture wearers. More than half of the residents (59%, n=79) were over 75 years old. Problems were mostly seen in older ages, especially those over 75 years old, over 60% of whom reported problems for all the variables listed in the questionnaire. Women were more aware of halitosis than men. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm those of previous studies and suggest that elderly people with dentures, and particularly complete dentures, frequently complain of a wide range of problems including: eating, social interaction and communication and these problems have a detrimental influence on their quality of life.