ABSTRACT
AIM: Management of acute otitis media (AOM) in infants younger than 2 months old is controversial. It varies between treatment on an outside basis, and hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics and sepsis work-up based on variability of the reported AOM pathogens in this particular group. Our aim is to identify clinical indicators that may suggest a need for an invasive medical work-up and/or hospitalization of these young patients, and compare their management to that of older infants. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. Admitted infants with AOM and a random sample of infants presenting to the emergency room with AOM over a 20-year period. Infants younger than 2 months were designated as 'young infants', and those older as 'older infants'. Demographic data, relevant history, physical examination, laboratory studies and treatment were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine admitted infants were included (13 young infants). A sample of 58 outpatients was studied, including two young infants. Compared to older inpatient infants, admitted young infants were less febrile (P < 0.05), had more benign white cell count (P < 0.05) but had more otorrhea (P < 0.05). These grew gram-negative organisms. Sepsis work-up was negative. Young infants were more likely to be admitted (P < 0.05). Admitted older infants had more otorrhea than outpatients (P < 0.05) or a complication (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Young infants often need admission for intravenous antibiotics, until middle ear culture is out. Sepsis work-up may be necessary only in toxic patients. Older infants need admission when severely ill or have a complication.
Subject(s)
Otitis Media/therapy , Patient Admission/standards , Acute Disease , Age Factors , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Otitis Media/complications , Otitis Media/microbiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To report a severe case of juvenile onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (JORRP) controlled by zinc replacement therapy. To review the contemporary adjuvant therapies used in JORRP. METHODS: The trial of zinc was described in terms of its effect on the inter-surgical interval, site score and clinical symptoms. Long-term follow-up with dose adjustment was detailed. Articles reporting trials of adjuvant therapies over the past 20 years were reviewed in terms of regimen used, mode of assessment, side effects and final outcome. RESULTS: Zinc was effective in decreasing the severity of the disease, the rate of relapse and the need for surgery. There was an obvious relation between the dose used and the degree of improvement. Prolonged treatment seems to be needed to sustain the positive effect. No side effects were noticed over a 45-month follow-up period. The literature does support the role of zinc in modulating the immune system. Eight adjuvant therapies were reviewed as published in 40 reports. Interferon was the most used substance. It is definitely effective but often associated with relapse upon discontinuation. The effect of cidofovir was favorable yet not dramatic as initially expected. Other less commonly used therapies showed humble effects. The HspE7 vaccine seems to be promising awaiting further trials. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc replacement therapy may benefit JORRP patients with zinc deficiency and should be investigated in more cases. Several adjuvant therapies are available for use in JORRP. They are generally beneficial though mostly not curative.