Major open abdominal surgery is associated with increased levels of endothelial damage and interleukin-6.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx shedding, endothelial damage, and surgical stress following major open abdominal surgery and the correlation to postoperative morbidity. INTRODUCTION: Major abdominal surgery is associated with high levels of postoperative morbidity. Two possible reasons are the surgical stress response and the impairment of the glycocalyx and endothelial cells. Further, the degree of these responses may correlate with postoperative morbidity and complications. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of prospectively collected data from two cohorts of patients undergoing open liver surgery, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, or Whipple procedure (n = 112). Hemodynamics and blood samples were collected at predefined timestamps and analyzed for biomarkers of glycocalyx shedding (Syndecan-1), endothelial activation (sVEGFR1), endothelial damage (sThrombomodulin (sTM)), and surgical stress (IL6). RESULTS: Major abdominal surgery led to increased levels of IL6 (0 to 85 pg/mL), Syndecan-1 (17.2 to 46.4 ng/mL), and sVEGFR1 (382.8 to 526.5 pg/mL), peaking at the end of the surgery. In contrast, sTM, did not increase during surgery, but increased significantly following surgery (5.9 to 6.9 ng/mL), peaking at 18 h following the end of surgery. Patients characterized with high postoperative morbidity had higher levels of IL6 (132 vs. 78 pg/mL, p = 0.007) and sVEGFR1 (563.1 vs. 509.4 pg/mL, p = 0.045) at the end of the surgery, and of sTM (8.2 vs. 6.4 ng/mL, p = 0.038) 18 h following surgery. CONCLUSION: Major abdominal surgery leads to significantly increased levels of biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx shedding, endothelial damage, and surgical stress, with the highest levels seen in patients developing high postoperative morbidity.

Palliation of dysphagia in patients with non-curable esophageal cancer - a retrospective Danish study from a highly specialized center.

PURPOSE: A majority of the patients with esophageal cancer (EC) suffer from dysphagia. Several endoscopic treatment options are available such as stent placement, argon plasma coagulation, and esophageal dilatation. This study aimed to map the use of endoscopic dysphagia relieving interventions and secondly investigate possible impact on survival. METHODS: Data was collected at the Dept. of Surgery & Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Patients with non-curable EC referred from 2016 to 2019 were included. Type of dysphagia treatment, complications and the need for repeated treatments, and survival were registered. RESULTS: In the study, 601 patients were included. Forty-five percent were treated with an endoscopic procedure due to dysphagia (82% had a stent placed). The median time from diagnosis to intervention was 24 days. The overall complication rate was 35% (38% in the stent group and 20% in the non-stent group, p = 0.03) and 13% of the patients were readmitted due to a complication. After 26% of the procedures, a repeated treatment was required. Patients having an endoscopic intervention had a worsened survival prognosis compared with the patients in the non-intervention group (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.80-2.61, p < 0.001). In the sub analysis where only patients who had an intervention was included, a survival difference in favor of the non-stent group was found (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the incidence of endoscopic procedures was high, complication rates were considerable, and many the patients required a second treatment. A survival difference was seen, where the patients who had a stent placed seemed to have the worst survival outcomes. However, the causal relationship is yet to be determined why the results must be interpreted carefully. New interventions and tailored approaches that may positively affect functional and long-term oncological outcomes are highly warranted and this should preferably be investigated in randomized clinical trials.

Embolization of the thoracic duct in patients with iatrogenic chylothorax.

Chylothorax is leakage of lymphatic fluid accumulating in the pleural cavity due to the thoracic duct's (TD) trauma or obstructions. It generally occurs as a traumatic complication after general thoracic surgery procedures (0.4%), especially after esophagectomy (4.7-8.6%). Traditionally, surgical intervention is performed if conservative management fails, but reports of high mortality (2.1%) and morbidity (38%) have led to the development of a minimally invasive percutaneous treatment method; TD embolization (TDE). The records of all patients treated for chylothorax with TDE from April 2015 to June 2019 were reviewed. Only patients with iatrogenic chylothorax were included. The outcomes measures are defined as a technical and a clinical success. A technical success, is defined as the ability to perform the embolization procedure, thereby injecting embolizing material Histoacryl with or without coils. A clinical success is defined as a complete cessation of lymphatic leakage into the pleural cavity without surgical intervention and, therefore, a cured patient. Lymphography was performed in all patients, and visualization of cisterna chyli was achieved in 14/17 patients (82.4%). Of the 17 patients included, 15 patients were successfully embolized and cured of chylothorax (88.2%). Successfully embolized patients had a median discharge time of 7 days. Most patients reported postprocedural pain, which was dealt with using conventional pain medication. TDE seems like a safe percutaneous treatment technique with a high clinical success rate in iatrogenic chylothorax patients which can be readily implemented if the clinical experience is available..