Protocol for assessing services for people with severe mental illness.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Standards Advisory Group was asked by UK health ministers to advise on the standards of clinical care being achieved for people with schizophrenia. A subcommittee commissioned a review of standards, followed by research into how far these were reflected in contracts and met by providers. METHOD: No comprehensive but practical set of standards was found. A protocol of 143 items of good service practice was constructed, and applied by teams visiting services in II UK districts. The team appraisals were summarised in 20 key points, each scored 0 (absent) to 4 (excellent performance). Seven points were used to assess standards of commissioning and 13 for standards of service provision. RESULTS: When placed into rank order, the mean key point scores for commissioners and providers in the same district tended to be very similar. Total district scores were then used to assign districts to one of three groups. Four performed reasonably well, five were moderate and two were poor. CONCLUSIONS: One of the key elements associated with these differences was the local level of morale. After wide consultation, a revised protocol of 26 key points for direct rating was drawn up and has since been further tested.

Relation between bed use, social deprivation, and overall bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units, and alternative residential options: a cross sectional survey, one day census data, and staff interviews.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation between bed use, social deprivation, and overall bed availability in acute adult psychiatric units and to explore the range of alternative residential options. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey, combined with one day census data; ratings by and interviews with staff; examination of routine data sources. SETTINGS: Nationally representative sample of acute psychiatric units. SUBJECTS: 2236 patients who were inpatients on census day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bed occupancy levels, judged need for continuing inpatient care, reasons preventing discharge, scores on the Health of the Nation outcome scales. RESULTS: Bed occupancy was related to social deprivation and total availability of acute beds (r = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.88, F = 8.72, df = 2.23; P = 0.002). However, 27% (603/2215) of current inpatients (61% (90/148) of those with stays of > 6 months) were judged not to need continuing admission. The major reasons preventing discharge were lack of suitable accommodation (37% (176/482) of patients in hospital < 6 months v 36% (31/86) of those in hospital > 6 months); inadequate domiciliary based community support (23% (113) v 9% (8)); and lack of long term rehabilitation places (21% (100) v 47% (40)). Scores on the Health of the Nation outcome scale were generally consistent with these staff judgments. CONCLUSIONS: The shortage of beds in acute psychiatric units is related to both social deprivation and the overall availability of acute beds. Patients currently inappropriately placed on acute admission wards should be relocated into more suitable accommodation, either in hospital or in the community. A range of provisions is required; simply providing more acute beds is not the answer.

The report of the clinical standard advisory group: standards of care for people with schizophrenia in the UK and implications for mental health nursing.

The Clinical Standards Advisory Group Schizophrenia Committee has spent two years (1993-1995) developing a standards protocol to assist all Purchasers and Providers with the task of producing optimum services for people with schizophrenia and other serious and enduring mental illnesses. This work has been underpinned by research that included visits to a representative sample of services throughout the UK. The report of this initiative, which was published in the summer of 1995, has many implications for mental health nursing. These include the continuing necessity to focus on serious mental illness; more effort to develop multidisciplinary working and the use of the Care Programme Approach; an increased focus on relevant training in case management and psychosocial interventions; the need to recognize physical health problems; the importance of medication management; and, as the Review of Mental Health Nursing emphasized, the issue of leadership should be targeted as a priority for action.

A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. I: Clinical and social outcome.

While research has shown community-based psychiatric care to be as good as, or better than, hospital-based care, generalisation to clinical practice has been difficult. This prospective, randomised controlled study examined a community-based approach feasible within NHS conditions. Ninety-four patients were randomly allocated to experimental and 78 to control treatments and followed for one year. The groups were well matched apart from an excess of psychotic control patients. No differences in clinical or social functioning outcome were found. Both groups improved substantially on clinical measures in the first six weeks, with some slow consolidation thereafter. There were three suicides in the control group and one in the experimental group. Access to care was better in the experimental group (93% attended assessment) than in the control group (75% attended assessment).

A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. II: Treatment patterns and costs.

Treatment records of 94 patients treated in an experimental home-based psychiatric service and 78 control patients in standard care were collected over one year. There was a substantial reduction in in-patient care in the experimental group, both in terms of proportion admitted and duration of admissions, despite similar out-patient and general practice care. The total treatment costs were significantly larger (> 50%) for standard care when controlled for by diagnostic grouping. Costs were further examined by including all specialist psychiatric care, and by excluding patients with primary diagnoses of brain damage or alcoholism. Sensitivity analysis explored the effects of increasing the cost of home visits. The relative cost effectiveness of the experimental service persisted. Clinical and social outcome was similar in control and experimental groups.