Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
CNS Drugs ; 30(10): 985-96, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27530525

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An economic analysis from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) evaluated the cost effectiveness of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) compared with atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who have had an inadequate response to methylphenidate. METHODS: A 1-year decision-analytic model was constructed, with the health outcomes "response", "nonresponse", and "unable to tolerate". Clinical data were taken from a head-to-head, randomized controlled trial in inadequate responders to methylphenidate. Response to treatment was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation rates owing to adverse events. Utility weights were identified via a systematic literature review. Healthcare resource use estimates were obtained via a survey of clinicians. Daily drug costs were derived from British National Formulary 2012 costs and mean doses reported in the trial. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed. RESULTS: The comparison of LDX with atomoxetine resulted in an estimate of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £1802 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The result was robust in a wide range of sensitivity analyses; results were most sensitive to changes in drug costs and efficacy. In the PSA, assuming a maximum willingness to pay of £20,000 per QALY, LDX versus atomoxetine had an 86 % probability of being cost effective. In 38 % of PSA runs, LDX was more effective and less costly than atomoxetine. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the UK NHS, LDX provides a cost-effective treatment option for children and adolescents who are inadequate responders to methylphenidate.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/economics , Central Nervous System Stimulants/economics , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Adolescent , Atomoxetine Hydrochloride/economics , Atomoxetine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Health Resources/economics , Humans , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate/economics , Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate/therapeutic use , Male , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Probability , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 66(24): 2728-2739, 2015 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26616031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and nonwarfarin oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as safe and effective alternatives to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of warfarin, NOACs, and LAAC with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) for stroke risk reduction in patients with nonvalvular AF at multiple time points over a lifetime horizon. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of LAAC, NOACs, and warfarin from the perspective of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services over a lifetime (20-year) horizon. Patients were 70 years of age and at moderate risk for stroke and bleeding. Clinical event rates, stroke outcomes, and quality of life information were drawn predominantly from PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) 4-year data and meta-analyses of warfarin and NOACs. Costs for stroke risk reduction therapies, treatment of associated acute events, and long-term care following disabling stroke were presented in 2015 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Relative to warfarin, LAAC was cost-effective at 7 years ($42,994/quality-adjusted life-years [QALY]), and NOACs were cost-effective at 16 years ($48,446/QALY). LAAC was dominant over NOACs by year 5 and warfarin by year 10. At 10 years, LAAC provided more QALYs than warfarin and NOACs (5.855 vs. 5.601 vs. 5.751, respectively). In sensitivity analyses, LAAC remained cost-effective relative to warfarin ($41,470/QALY at 11 years) and NOACs ($21,964/QALY at 10 years), even if procedure costs were doubled. CONCLUSIONS: Both NOACs and LAAC with the Watchman device were cost-effective relative to warfarin, but LAAC was also found to be cost-effective and to offer better value relative to NOACs. The results of this analysis should be considered when formulating policy and practice guidelines for stroke prevention in AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/economics , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Health Care Costs , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Stroke/prevention & control , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Follow-Up Studies , Forecasting , Massachusetts , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors
3.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 33(10): 1029-47, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25969152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gout is a chronic and inflammatory form of arthritis that is often overlooked despite the associated pain caused by acute flares and associated joint damage caused by the development of debilitating tophi. The increasing burden of gout, due to an aging population and the increased prevalence of known risk factors for hyperuricaemia, means that there is a continued need for new and effective urate-lowering treatments. The evaluation of these treatments will require a comprehensive and comparative evidence base describing the economic and humanistic burden of gout, taken from the perspective of patients, the healthcare system, and wider society. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to review and summarise the current evidence of the disease burden related to chronic gout, assessed in terms of both cost and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and to identify key factors correlated with an increased burden. The overall aim is to support the economic evaluation of new treatments for gout, and to highlight key data gaps that may need further study and exploration. METHODS: Relevant literature dating from January 2000 to July 2014 was sourced through searches of the MEDLINE database via PubMed and The Cochrane Library. Articles published in English and reporting either the economic burden (cost) or the humanistic burden (HRQL/utility) of gout were identified, and key data were extracted and summarised, with key themes and data gaps identified and discussed. RESULTS: Of the 323 studies identified, 39 met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 and 26 were relevant to the economic and humanistic burden, respectively. The economic burden of gout varied according to numerous factors, most notably serum urate acid levels and number of flares and tophi, resulting in higher healthcare resource use most often attributed to hospitalisation and inpatient stay. The incremental direct cost of gout has been suggested in the range of US$3165 to US$5515 (2004 and 2005 values, respectively) climbing to US$10,222 to US$21,467 (2008 values) per annum where patients are experiencing regular acute flares and have tophi present. The humanistic burden of gout was largely due to physical disability and pain resulting from chronic clinical manifestations. Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) assessed utility weights are estimated at 0.53 for a patient with severe gout (≥3 flares/year and tophi) compared with 0.73 for an asymptomatic gout patient with serum acid levels <6 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence confirms that gout has a growing overall prevalence and represents a significant burden in terms of both direct healthcare cost and HRQL outcomes. In light of this, effective urate-lowering treatments are likely to be valued if they can be clearly demonstrated to be both clinically effective and cost effective. Published data to support healthcare decision making in non-US countries with regards to treatments for gout are currently limited, which is a key limitation of the current evidence base. More research is also required to extend our understanding of the impact of gout on indirect costs, and a need also exists to develop a more comprehensive set of comparative HRQL utility assessments.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Gout/economics , Gout/therapy , Health Services/economics , Quality of Life , Gout/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence
4.
Eur J Health Econ ; 15(5): 453-63, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23719971

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to evaluate data on the cost-effectiveness of febuxostat compared with standard clinical practice with allopurinol in patients with gout that was presented to the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) in 2010. A Markov health-state model estimated the direct health-related costs and clinical benefits expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Adults with chronic gout and established hyperuricaemia received treatment sequences of daily doses of allopurinol 300 mg alone or allopurinol 300 mg followed by febuxostat 80 mg/120 mg. The proportion of patients achieving the target serum uric acid (sUA) level of less than 6 mg/dl (0.36 mmol/l) was linked to the utility per sUA level to generate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Second-line therapy with febuxostat 80 mg/120 mg versus with allopurinol alone resulted in an ICER of £3,578 per QALY over a 5-year time horizon. Additional univariate analyses showed that ICER values were robust and ranged from £2,550 to £7,165 per QALY when different parameters (e.g., low- and high-dose allopurinol titrations and variations in treatment-induced flare rates) were varied. Febuxostat reduces sUA below the European League Against Rheumatism target of 0.36 mmol/l (6 mg/dl) in significantly more patients with gout than allopurinol in its most frequently prescribed dose of 300 mg per day. The SMC accepted febuxostat as cost-effective as a suitable second-line option for urate-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with chronic hyperuricaemia in conditions where urate deposition has already occurred (including a history or presence of tophus and/or gouty arthritis) when treatment with allopurinol was inadequate, not tolerated, or contraindicated.


Subject(s)
Gout Suppressants/economics , Gout Suppressants/therapeutic use , Gout/drug therapy , Hyperuricemia/drug therapy , Thiazoles/economics , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Febuxostat , Humans , Markov Chains , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Uric Acid/blood
5.
J Med Econ ; 14(1): 99-107, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21222505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incremental cost of healthcare and clinical outcomes in the 12 months following incident hip fractures among postmenopausal women in the UK. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of women aged 50 years or older hospitalized for an incident hip fracture within 1 week of the fracture date who were age- and comorbidity-matched to women without fracture. Cohorts were identified in the Health Improvement Network database, and followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: Among 2,427 women who had a hip fracture and a recorded hospitalization, the mean [SD] age was 81 [9.3] years. About 18% of women without fractures were hospitalized during follow-up and 18% of women with hip fractures and 4% of women without fractures had at least one emergency admission (RR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.8-5.8). There were no major differences in use of general practitioner visit, referral visits, or in prescription of medications. Mortality was 18% in the hip fracture cohort and 7% in the non-fracture cohort (RR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1-3.0). The overall 1-year mean incremental cost of hip fractures was £4,222 (95% CI, £4,105-4,339); most of this cost (97%) was for hospitalizations, with an increment of £4,095. About 98% of the incremental cost occurred in the first 6 months following hip fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the cost and clinical burden associated with hip fractures in postmenopausal women in the UK are considerable. The incremental cost is mostly related to the cost of hospitalization and treatment of the hip fracture. Key limitations were the inclusion of only those women with a recorded hospitalization, and that costs associated with rehabilitation services, social services, and long-term care were not recorded in this study, although these are important contributors to the total cost of fractures.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Hip Fractures/economics , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hip Fractures/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom
6.
Pain Pract ; 11(6): 516-27, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21199320

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis compared efficacy (pain response) of drugs that are licensed or commonly used in the treatment of fibromyalgia. A meta-analysis of safety measured via discontinuation because of adverse events was also performed. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials to estimate treatment differences vs. placebo, separately, for duloxetine, fluoxetine, gabapentin, milnacipran, pramipexole, pregabalin, either of two tricyclic antidepressants, and tramadol plus paracetamol. Indirect treatment comparisons using mixed treatment comparisons methodology were conducted for all pairwise comparisons. Pain response was analyzed as improvement of at least 30%, and separately of 50%, from baseline. RESULTS: When compared with placebo, statistically significant pain responses (improvement of 30% and 50%) were observed for patients treated with duloxetine, milnacipran 200 mg/day, pregabalin 300 or 450 mg/day, and tramadol plus paracetamol. Treatment with fluoxetine, gabapentin, or milnacipran 100 mg/day resulted in significant findings for the 30% improvement in pain response. The meta-analysis showed a statistically increased risk of discontinuation because of adverse events for milnacipran 100 and 200 mg/day (both P < 0.001), and pregabalin 300 and 450 mg/day (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). All other treatments, except fluoxetine, showed numerically increased risk over placebo for discontinuation because of adverse events. In the indirect comparisons, no pairwise comparison of active treatments reached statistical significance for either pain response end point. CONCLUSION: All eight active treatments displayed evidence suggesting improvement over placebo in the treatment of pain in patients suffering from fibromyalgia. Indirect comparison of active treatments found no strong differences.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Fibromyalgia/complications , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Fibromyalgia/drug therapy , Humans , Pain Measurement
7.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 17(2): 288-97, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21029268

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: This review aims to examine economic evaluations of varenicline, to compare the reported cost-effectiveness of varenicline with that of treatments for major smoking-related diseases and to evaluate the findings for decision making. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify published articles in English indexed in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), which includes the Economic Evaluation Database. Additional sources also were searched to identify unpublished varenicline studies, including conference abstracts. The search for varenicline studies was limited from 2006 to October 2009; searches for all other types of studies were limited from 1990 to October 2009. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 20 relevant economic evaluations of varenicline. In addition, 37 reviews of economic evaluations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, non-small cell lung cancer and cardiovascular disease, as well as studies evaluating the impact of economic rewarding were considered in this review. From these identified economic evaluations, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for varenicline ranged from dominance (more effective and cost saving) to €18,582 per quality-adjusted life-year (including indirect costs). These estimates appeared substantially lower when compared with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios reported for secondary prevention of smoking-related diseases, which in some cases were as high as €66,218 per quality-adjusted life-year. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline appears to be cost-effective from the perspective of both health care payers and employers, because of reduced health care consumption and costs. The cost-effectiveness of varenicline also compares favourably to that of interventions recommended for the treatment and prevention of smoking-related diseases.


Subject(s)
Benzazepines/economics , Nicotinic Agonists/economics , Quinoxalines/economics , Smoking/adverse effects , Benzazepines/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Morbidity , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Varenicline
8.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 26(2): 63-8, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21088608

ABSTRACT

This study systematically collated clinical evidence on refractory generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Refractory GAD patients are those who have failed to respond adequately to at least one earlier treatment for GAD. MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and conference proceedings were searched to identify trials. Four placebo-controlled trials (pregabalin, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone) and four single-arm studies (aripiprazole, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone) evaluated the add-ons to initial treatment(s) or switch of treatment(s) because of inadequate efficacy. The most robust trial was the pregabalin study, with a study duration of 8 weeks and a largest sample size that consists of 356 patients. A significant reduction in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score was found for pregabalin and risperidone augmentation compared with placebo. Olanzapine augmentation resulted in a significantly higher proportion of responders (using HAM-A scores) compared with placebo. Quetiapine augmentation did not result in significantly greater mean reductions in the HAM-Ascores compared with placebo. There is a need for effective and safe augmentation treatments for patient's refractory to initial treatments for GAD. This study has located one large robust trial assessing the add-on to pregabalin. All other trials were small and unpowered studies with less than 50 patients. Further high-quality trials of augmentation treatment on refractory GAD are required.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Placebos , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
9.
Clin Ther ; 31(1): 194-212, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19243718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This was an evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of oral dabigatran etexilate compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) surgery from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. METHODS: Dabigatran etexilate (220 mg once daily) was compared with enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) in patients undergoing TKR (duration of prophylaxis, 6-10 days) and THR (duration of prophylaxis, 28-35 days). The 10-week acute postsurgical phase was modeled using a decision tree. A Markov process (1-year cycle length) was used to model long-term events (recurrent VTE, postthrombotic syndrome, and consequences of intracranial hemorrhage) for patients' remaining lifetimes. Relative risks for VTE and bleeding events were derived from 2 Phase III studies that compared dabigatran etexilate with enoxaparin 40 mg once daily. The probabilities of long-term events were estimated using data from published longitudinal studies. RESULTS: Rates of VTE and bleeding events did not differ significantly between dabigatran etexilate and enoxaparin. Dabigatran etexilate was less costly than enoxaparin in TKR and substantially less costly in THR, primarily due to differences in administration costs. The cost of prophylaxis for THR patients, including drugs and administration costs, was estimated at pound 137 for dabigatran etexilate and pound 237 for enoxaparin ( pound 7 for nursing time during the hospital stay, pound 91 for nurse home visits for administration after hospital discharge, and an additional pound 2 in drug costs). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of pound 20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probability of cost-effectiveness for dabigatran etexilate was 75% in TKR and 97% in THR. These results were robust across a range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of the UK National Health Service, thromboprophylaxis with dabigatran etexilate was cost-saving compared with enoxaparin 40 mg once daily, with comparable efficacy and safety profiles.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/economics , Benzimidazoles/economics , Pyridines/economics , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dabigatran , Decision Trees , Drug Costs , Enoxaparin/administration & dosage , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Enoxaparin/economics , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Markov Chains , National Health Programs/economics , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , United Kingdom
10.
Eur J Health Econ ; 7(3): 165-72, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16896764

ABSTRACT

Second-generation atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, amisulpride and ariprazole offer the potential to reduce the significant health care resource demands in the treatment of schizophrenia through improved levels of initial clinical response and reduced levels of long-term acute relapse. However, the optimal sequencing of these drugs remains unclear. To consider this issue from a health economic viewpoint a decision model approach was used comparing healthcare costs and clinical outcomes when treating patients with alternative sequences of atypical antipsychotic treatment. Treated patients were assumed to be in a current acute episode with at least a 10-year history of disease and to be naive to previous atypical treatments. Treatment strategies were based on either first-line olanzapine or risperidone with switching to the alternative drug as second-line treatment following an inadequate clinical response to first-line drug therapy. Clinical response data were derived from a pivotal published comparative study of both olanzapine and risperidone. Published data on the long-term use of antipsychotic drugs where used wherever possible to populate the model for relapse rates during the maintenance phase. Health care resource data were defined for Germany based on expert clinical opinion. A treatment strategy of first-line olanzapine was shown to be cost saving over a 1-year period, with additional clinical benefits in the form of avoided relapses. The model suggests that over the first year of treatment a strategy of first-line olanzapine is associated with lower risk of additional relapse (0.33 fewer acute relapses per 100 patients per year) and with cost savings (euro 35,306 per 100 patients per year). There is a need for longer term direct in-trial comparisons of atypical antipsychotics to confirm these indicative results.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Decision Support Techniques , Health Care Costs , Risperidone/economics , Schizophrenia/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/economics , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Germany , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Olanzapine , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Recurrence , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Suicide Prevention
11.
Eur J Health Econ ; 6(2): 172-82, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15765243

ABSTRACT

Prophylaxis-based antiviral treatment and intensive monitoring followed by pre-emptive antiviral treatment are both commonly used management strategies to reduce risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following renal transplantation. This study employed a decision-model approach using published efficacy data and information from a recent survey of French clinical practice to consider the relative costs and outcomes associated with CMV prevention strategies for high-risk patient groups. The cost per case of treating tissue invasive and symptomatic CMV disease was estimated at euro 15,431 and euro 10,852, respectively. In the highest infection-risk patient group (positive donor with no previous CMV history) prophylactic oral valaciclovir was shown to avoid the greatest number of CMV disease cases (35 cases per 100 transplanted patients) and reduced the overall CMV-related costs per transplanted patient by around 14% over a'wait-and-treat' baseline strategy. In contrast, intensive monitoring and preemptive treatment resulted in a much higher cost per transplanted patient. This analysis suggests that prophylactic treatment remains the most cost-effective approach to the management of CMV in renal-transplanted patients. Further comparative studies between prophylactic and pre-emptive treatment would be a valuable addition to the current evidence based on CMV prevention.


Subject(s)
Acyclovir/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/economics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus/drug effects , Kidney Transplantation , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Acyclovir/economics , Acyclovir/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Valacyclovir , Valine/economics , Valine/therapeutic use
12.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 22(4): 207-24, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14974872

ABSTRACT

High-intermediate grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an aggressive form of the disease, which can respond well to combination chemotherapy, with long-term survival seen in 40-50% of patients. When NHL relapses following standard treatment, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow support may still cure a significant proportion of patients. Despite a significant rise in the incidence of NHL over recent years, there remains only limited published economic study concerning the overall lifetime cost of treatment, the cost effectiveness of specific treatments or the overall societal cost burden of the disease. The majority of studies identified for the purposes of this review considered the cost of alternative forms of chemotherapy and bone marrow support strategies for patients with advanced disease. Data from these studies suggest that there is a definite trend towards reduced costs for high-dose therapy, possibly reflecting increasing technical experience and improved bone marrow recovery through the use of stem cell transplantation and growth factors. The limited number of cost-effectiveness evaluations suggest that high-dose therapy, following a chemosensitive relapse, is likely to be considered favourable against commonly quoted cost-effectiveness thresholds. Cost effectiveness is becoming an increasingly important factor to consider in the formal assessment of new interventions conducted by groups such as the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence. In light of the increasing incidence of NHL and the extended use of high-dose treatments in other subgroups of patients, there is a need for increased research into the economics of new interventions for NHL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy/economics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
13.
Psychiatr Serv ; 54(4): 508-16, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12663838

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors examined published economic evaluations of schizophrenia and antipsychotic therapies to determine the role of compliance with medication therapy in the economic cost of schizophrenia. METHODS: The authors reviewed studies published from 1995 to 2002 that evaluated compliance with treatment for schizophrenia. Literature searches were conducted for that period by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents. The primary search terms were "schizophrenia," "compliance," "relapse," and "economic costs." RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A definitive relationship exists between compliance and the economic costs of schizophrenia. Lower rates of compliance lead to higher costs of treating schizophrenia. However, the full implications are difficult to surmise from the literature because of inadequacies in the reporting of compliance rates and outcomes of treatment over time. The authors suggest collection of data on longer-term clinical outcomes as a means to improve future economic evaluations of schizophrenia treatments.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/economics , Self Administration/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Cost of Illness , Direct Service Costs , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Health Care Costs , Humans , Treatment Refusal
14.
Vaccine ; 20(13-14): 1778-86, 2002 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11906765

ABSTRACT

This work estimates the health and cost impacts of a pre-school booster vaccination for Bordetella pertussis, when added to existing UK primary vaccination. A transition state simulation model of pertussis infection in a closed population was constructed comprising of susceptible, infected and immune population sub-groups, across eight age bands. Epidemiological, service use and cost data were sourced from routine statistics, published literature and clinician estimates. The introduction of a pre-school booster is predicted to reduce the number of hospitalisations by approximately 1400 and pertussis cases suffered by up to 28,000 at a net investment of under 13 million pounds over a 5-year period.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/economics , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Secondary , Models, Economic , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...