Gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the expanded access protocol experience at the University of Pennsylvania.

Gefitinib (Iressa; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) is an oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with favorable toxicity and antitumor activity in pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC treated at our institution as part of an expanded access protocol; 112 patients with advanced NSCLC were entered. All patients had failed at least one previous chemotherapy regimen, or were not suitable for any systemic chemotherapy because of poor performance status (PS), or were ineligible for other clinical trials. Therapy consisted of gefitinib 250 mg orally once daily; 10.5% (95% CI 5.3-17.9%) of patients achieved partial/minimal response (PR/MR) and 29.5% (95% CI 21.0-39.2%) had stable disease (SD), resulting in a disease control rate (PR/MR+SD) of 40% (95% CI 31-50%). The median duration of treatment for all patients was 12 weeks (range 2-116 weeks) and for patients achieving disease control 28 weeks (range 8-116). Nine patients received gefitinib for more than 1 year. Median survival was 30 weeks. Symptoms were improved in 36% of evaluable patients, and 64% of patients who achieved disease control experienced improvement of their disease related symptoms. Adverse events were generally mild and consisted mostly of skin rash (48%) and diarrhea (38%). A statistically significant association was observed between disease control and skin rash (p = < 0.001), nonsmoking status (p = 0.048), and symptom improvement (p = 0.001). The disease control rate was not statistically associated with histology, PS, gender, or number of prior treatments. In addition, longer survival was significantly associated with skin rash (p = < 0.001) and symptom improvement (p = < 0.001). Gefitinib demonstrated relevant clinical activity and a favorable toxicity profile in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. The development of toxicity was associated with a favorable response. In addition, a history of never having smoked seems to predict a higher efficacy of gefitinib.

Evidence against trigger point injection technique for the treatment of cervicothoracic myofascial pain with botulinum toxin type A.

BACKGROUND: Traditional strategies for myofascial pain relief provide transient, incomplete, variable, or unpredictable outcomes. Botulinum toxin is itself an analgesic but can also cause sustained muscular relaxation, thereby possibly affording even greater relief than traditional therapies. METHODS: The study goal was to determine whether direct injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) into trigger points was efficacious for cervicothoracic myofascial pain, and if so, to determine the presence or absence of a dose-response relation. One hundred thirty-two patients with cervical or shoulder myofascial pain or both and active trigger points were enrolled in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After a 2-week washout period for all medications, patients were injected with either saline or 10, 25, or 50 U BoNT-A into up to five active trigger points. The maximum doses in each experimental group were 0, 50, 125, and 250 U per patient, respectively. Patients subsequently received myofascial release physical therapy and amitriptyline, ibuprofen, and propoxyphene-acetaminophen napsylate. Follow-up visits occurred at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks. Outcome measures included visual analog pain scores, pain threshold as measured by pressure algometry, and rescue dose use of propoxyphene-acetaminophen napsylate. RESULTS: No significant differences occurred between placebo and BoNT-A groups with respect to visual analog pain scores, pressure algometry, and rescue medication. CONCLUSIONS: Injection of BoNT-A directly into trigger points did not improve cervicothoracic myofascial pain. The role of direct injection of trigger points with BoNT-A is discussed in comparison to other injection methodologies in the potential genesis of pain relief.