Pre-treatment and bioconversion of wastewater sludge to value-added products--fate of endocrine disrupting compounds.

Development of processes for the production of value added products (VAPs), such as biopesticides, microbial inoculants or industrial enzymes through biotransformation of raw or pre-treated wastewater sludge (WWS) has undergone a substantial progress over the last decade. WWS based VAPs are low cost biological alternatives that can compete with chemicals or other cost intensive biological products in the current markets. However, when WWS is used as a raw material for VAPs production, questions still remains on the persistence of organic pollutants within the biotransformed WWS, especially, endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and the production of their toxic intermediates. WWS pre-treatment prior to biotransformation as well as the microbial strains used for biotransformation can possibly remove these organic pollutants. The literature findings concerning the impact of WWS pre-treatment and value added products on EDCs removal are reviewed in this paper. The microbial potential to degrade or detoxify EDCs and toxic intermediates concomitant with value-addition is also discussed. The concept of obtaining EDCs free-WWS based VAPs and simultaneously achieving the objective of pollution control is presented.

Plasticizers and related toxic degradation products in wastewater sludges.

Plasticizers can persist during the treatment of wastewaters in sewage treatment plants (STPs) and can be discharged in effluents and/or accumulated in sewage sludges. For example, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) is a common plasticizer that is now considered a priority pollutant and is known to accumulate in sludges. This may add constraints to the exploitation of the beneficial uses of sludges that contain significant quantities of plasticizers. Recently, it was demonstrated in studies with pure cultures that the biodegradation of plasticizers including DEHP and di-ethylhexyl adipate (DEHA) generates toxic metabolites including 2-ethylhexanoic acid, 2-ethylhexanol, and 2-ethylhexanal. However, the environmental impacts and fate of the degradation products arising from plasticizers are unknown. Therefore, this work investigated the concentrations of DEHP and DEHA and their metabolites in the sludges from several STPs in Quebec, Canada. DEHP and DEHA were found in concentrations ranging from 15 to 346 mg kg(-1) and 4 to 743 mg kg(-1), respectively, in primary, secondary, digested, dewatered or dried sludges. Metabolites were detected in almost all sludges, except those that had undergone a drying process at high temperature. It is concluded that sludges can represent significant sources of plasticizers and their toxic metabolites in the environment.

Plasticizers and their degradation products in the process streams of a large urban physicochemical sewage treatment plant.

The plasticizers bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (BEHP), bis (2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (BEHTP) and bis (2-ethylhexyl) adipate (BEHA) were found in significant quantities in the influents, process streams, treated effluent and solid residues of a large physicochemical treatment plant in Montreal, Canada. Of these plasticizers, BEHA was the most abundant in the influent but most was removed during primary treatment. Evidence indicated that significant biodegradation occurred within the sewers and during treatment resulting in the formation of three biodegradation products that had been reported in earlier laboratory studies; namely, 2-ethylhexanol, 2-ethylhexanal and 2-ethylhexanoic acid. Significantly greater concentrations of 2-ethylhexanal were found in process streams than had been reported in earlier laboratory work. This was attributed to the fact that there were fewer opportunities for losses of this volatile compound over the course of wastewater treatment. The plasticizers were removed from the aqueous phase to varying degrees during treatment, with most ending up in the solid residues. All three metabolites and the parent plasticizers were observed in the effluent and most were found in the solids that were analyzed. Results suggest that the treatment plant does not effectively remove plasticizers from the influent and represents a significant source of these compounds and their degradation products in the environment.