Accuracy of Cutaneous Landmarks Compared to Ultrasound to Locate the Calcaneal Footprint of the CFL.

The purpose was to determine the accuracy of the techniques of Lopes et al. and Michels et al., compared to ultrasound, to locate the center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL in healthy volunteers. The authors recruited 17 healthy adult volunteers at 1 center with no current ankle pathologies and no previous surgical antecedents on either ankle. The authors recorded the age, sex, height, BMI, and ankle side for each volunteer. Measurements were made on both ankles of the 17 volunteers to increase the sample size and ensure less dispersion of data, independently by 2 surgeons: 1 senior surgeon with 15 years' experience and 1 junior with 3 years' experience. The location of the center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL was determined by each surgeon using 3 methods: (1) the cutaneous technique of Lopes et al., (2) the cutaneous technique of Michels et al., and (3) ultrasound imaging. The 17 volunteers (34 feet) had a mean age of 26.3 ± 8.7 and a BMI of 21.7 ± 2.9. The Michels point was significantly closer (4.6 ± 3.7 mm) than the Lopes point (11.1 ± 5.4 mm) to the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL determined by ultrasound, notably in the vertical direction. The Michels point was located significantly closer to the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL and demonstrated less dispersion than the Lopes point, indicated by significantly lower absolute mean deviation from the true center of the calcaneal footprint of the CFL, and that ultrasound is therefore preferred to locate the footprint the CFL.

Intra-articular fibrous bands at the tibiotalar joint: diagnosis and outcomes of arthroscopic removal in 4 ankles.

The authors retrieved the records of 4 patients that exhibited unusual structural anomalies or pathologies, notably the presence of a fibrous band at the anterior aspect of the tibiotalar joint, observed during arthroscopic exploration or treatment between January and December 2019. Only 1 patient had surgical antecedents on the ipsilateral ankle (extra-articular tenodesis 10 years earlier). The remaining 3 patients had no surgical antecedents on the ipsilateral ankle. The fibrous band was removed in all patients during arthroscopic Brostöm procedure or exploration. For the first 3 patients, the intra-articular fibrous band was not observed prior to arthroscopy by either the senior surgeon or radiologist on any of the images (2 MRIs and 1 CTA), but retrospective inspection confirmed that the intra-articular fibrous band was present but had been overlooked.At a follow-up of 22.3 ± 5.0 months (range, 15-26), all patients reported a decrease in pVAS (- 5.0 ± 2.6, range, 2-8), and an improvement in AOFAS (51.0 ± 17.7, range, 26-65), EFAS (14.5 ± 8.7, range, 6-23) and EFAS sport (8.0 ± 5.3, range, 2-10).This case report corroborates the findings of an earlier discovery of an intra-articular fibrous band in 4 ankles, with more detailed information for clinical and radiologic diagnosis, as well as outcomes of arthroscopic removal. Clinicians should beware of such foreign bodies in the ankle, particularly in patients with history of sprains, and consider arthroscopic removal in cases with persistent pain and/or functional impairment.

Weight-bearing CT in foot and ankle pathology.

Cone-beam scanners (CBCT) enable CT to be performed under weight-bearing - notably for the foot and ankle. The technology is not new: it has been used since 1996 in dental surgery, where it has come to replace panoramic X-ray. What is new is placing the scanner on the ground, so as to have 3D weight-bearing images, initially of the foot and ankle, and later for the knee and pelvis. This saves time, radiation and money. It is now increasingly used, but is unfortunately limited by not having specific national health insurance cover in France, and by the psychological reticence that goes with any technological breakthrough. A review of the topic is indispensable, as it is essential to become properly acquainted with this technique. To this end, we shall be addressing 5 questions. What biases does conventional radiography incur? Projecting a volume onto a plane incurs deformation, precluding true measurement. Conventional CT is therefore often associated with an increased dose of radiation. What is the impact of CBCT on radiation dose, costs and the care pathway? The conical beam turns around the limb (under weight-bearing if so desired) in less than a minute, making the radiation dose no greater than in standard X-ray. What does the literature have to say about CBCT, and what are the indications? CBCT is indicated in all foot and ankle pathologies, and indications now extend to the upper limb and the knee, and will soon include the pelvis. How are angles measured on this 3D technique? The recently developed concept of 3D biometry uses dedicated software to identify anatomic landmarks and automatically segment the bones, thereby enabling every kind of measurement. What further developments are to be expected? CBCT may become indispensable to lower-limb surgical planning. Artificial Intelligence will reveal novel diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic solutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.

Incidence and outcomes of revision surgery after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: Multicenter study of 158 cases.

INTRODUCTION: First metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint arthrodesis, described as a safe and effective procedure, has complications that may require surgical revision. These complications are rarely studied. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of revision surgery after MT1 arthrodesis. HYPOTHESIS: The incidence of surgical revision after MTP1 arthrodesis is not insignificant; however, the outcomes are satisfactory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study between January 2014 and December 2015, 190 forefoot revisions in patients who had previously undergone MTP1 arthrodesis were included by 8 surgeons. There were no exclusion criteria and all patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. Over the same period, 958 primary MTP1 arthrodesis procedures were performed. RESULTS: The mean time to revision was 4.6±10.9 years. At a mean follow-up of 20.5±7.4 months, 158 cases were available for analysis in 135 women and 20 men who had a mean age of 67.1±10.5 years. These revision procedures were carried out because of discomfort related to the hardware at the arthrodesis site (n=86, 54%), nonunion (n=22, 14%), malunion (n=13, 8%) metatarsalgia or claw toe (n=18, 11%) and first interphalangeal (IP1) joint disorders (n=13, 8%). The mean postoperative scores were 75±13.9 for the AOFAS and 65±19.6 for the SF36 total. In the nonunion cases, removal of the hardware led to better outcomes than repeating the arthrodesis procedure. Osteotomy in the malunion cases healed successfully. In the cases of IP1 osteoarthritis, secondary arthrodesis or arthroplasty led to good outcomes. DISCUSSION: Relative to published results of primary MTP1 arthrodesis, the outcomes in our series of revision MTP1 arthrodesis surgery cases are practically equivalent, thus considered acceptable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective study.