Neurologists' preferences for device-aided therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This study measures the relative preference for attributes of device-aided therapies (DATs) for advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) from the perspective of Japanese neurologists. METHODS: Attributes and levels were elicited based on literature and interviews with certified neurologists experienced with DATs. An online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was developed, pilot tested, and distributed through an online panel to neurologists treating advanced PD patients. Participants were asked to choose treatments among several choice sets of two hypothetical DATs described only by the attributes, or no DAT (continuing oral treatment). A conditional logit model using the Bayesian framework was developed to estimate the marginal utilities of attributes' levels, and the relative utility of treatments available to Japanese advanced PD patients or being developed in Japan was assessed. RESULTS: The DCE survey completed by 308 neurologists showed that the attributes with the greatest influence on DAT selection were surgery requirement (relative importance of 28%), average increase in the duration of daily "on" time without dyskinesia which affects daily activities (15%), average change in cognitive function related to treatment introduction (15%), device management frequency (14%), average number of pills of oral PD medication after treatment introduction (13%), average influence of treatment on symptoms of depression (12%), and type of device (large/small) (3%). All attributes significantly influenced respondents' choices, except for external device type. Experience with DATs did not influence the directions of preferences. Out of treatment profiles representing DATs, continuous subcutaneous infusion of levodopa-carbidopa had a higher preference score than levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion and deep brain stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that Japanese neurologists would prefer a DAT without surgery requirement. Other factors related to efficacy, safety, and administration mode have a significant, but a smaller influence on prescription choices.

How pet owners choose antiparasitic treatments for their dogs: A discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: External and internal parasites can cause significant pathology to pets, posing distress to their owners. Antiparasitic treatment is complex because there are many antiparasitic products and dog owners have a limited understanding of parasiticides. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of antiparasitic treatments available at veterinary offices to help veterinarians understand what pet owners value when selecting parasiticides for their dogs. METHODS: Discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology was used. A list of important treatment attributes was developed based on semi-structured interviews with six dog owners with a total of nine dogs and six veterinarians. The questionnaire including 12 choices between pairs of hypothetical products defined according to treatment attributes was developed. The questionnaire was administered to UK dog owners recruited through an internet panel. It was tested in a pilot study with 17 dog owners, and then was completed by 160 dog owners in the main study. RESULTS: The selected treatment attributes were price, spectrum of action, veterinarian recommendation, treatment schedule, mode of administration, and place of obtention. The main analysis showed the first four of these attributes significantly influenced the preferences of dog owners for antiparasitic treatments. The most important factor was spectrum of action; most owners expressed a preference for products treating multiple parasites. The influence of price was comparable to that of spectrum of action. Pet owners were more likely to choose a product recommended by their veterinarian. Willingness-to-pay estimates were £11.22 [€12.68; $15.38] for extending protection from fleas and ticks only to intestinal worm and lungworm and £7.21 [€8.14; $9.87] for recommendation from veterinarian. CONCLUSIONS: A broad spectrum of action, veterinarian recommendation, and price are key drivers for choosing antiparasitic products among dog owners. These results may help veterinarians with recommendations of antiparasitic treatment for pet owners based on the key drivers pet owners value.

International consensus is needed on premedication for non-emergency neonatal intubation after survey found wide-ranging policies and practices in 70 countries.

AIM: This study evaluated whether practitioners from 70 countries used premedication for non-emergency neonatal intubation and identified attitudes and experience regarding the safety, side effects and efficiency of neonatal intubation. METHODS: Invitations to take part in the survey were issued between December 18, 2018 and February 4, 2019 to the users of neonatal-based websites and Facebook groups, members of professional societies and the authors of relevant publications in the last five years. RESULTS: We analysed 718 completed questionnaires from 40 European and 30 non-European countries. Most of the responses were from neonatologists (69.6%) and paediatric or neonatal trainees (10.3%). In units without a protocol (31.6%), more than half of the practitioners (60.4%) chose premedication according to personal preference and 37.0%-11.9% of the overall respondents did not use any drugs for non-emergency intubation. The most frequently reported drug combination was fentanyl, atropine and succinylcholine (6.8%). Most of the practitioners (78.5%) use the same drugs for term and preterm infants. Only 24.8% of the physicians were fully satisfied with their premedication practices. CONCLUSION: Nearly 12% of the respondents did not use premedication for non-emergency neonatal intubation. The wide-ranging policies and practices found among the respondents highlight the need for international consensus guidelines.