Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Cient. dent. (Ed. impr.) ; 21(1): 1-10, abr.-2024. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-232708

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la pérdida ósea tras las extracciones puede requerir en el maxilar posterior la realización de una elevación de seno para la correcta colocación de implantes. El hueso autólogo se considera el gold estándar, pero tiene una alta tasa de reabsorción y morbilidad, haciendo que haya otras alternativas como el diente autólogo, con buenos resultados en procedimientos regenerativos. Este caso clínico evalúa a nivel clínico, radiográfico e histomorfométrico el empleo del diente autólogo en elevación de seno maxilar y el comportamiento de dos implantes colocados de manera diferida. Caso clínico: se presenta el caso de una mujer de 48 años, que acudió a consulta para reponer el sector posterior derecho. Se realizó la exodoncia del 4.8 como diente donante para utilizarlo como biomaterial en una elevación de seno de acceso lateral, colocando dos implantes seis meses tras la intervención, y evaluándolos seis meses tras su carga protésica. Discusión: el diente autólogo en el presente caso clínico presentó un 30,56% de hueso neoformado tras seis meses de espera, con mejores resultados que al emplear aloinjertos y xenoinjertos. Además, diferentes aspectos culturales y étnicos respaldan la aceptación del diente autólogo por parte de los pacientes, aunque se necesitan más estudios a largo plazo para evaluar la estabilidad de este tipo de injerto en elevación de seno maxilar. Conclusiones: el diente autólogo en la elevación de seno ofrece biocompatibilidad, baja incidencia de complicaciones y buena aceptación por parte del paciente, con un buen comportamiento clínico y radiográfico de los implantes, a pesar del poco tiempo transcurrido en este caso tras la carga. (AU)


Introduction: Bone loss after extractions may require a sinus elevation to be performed in the posterior maxilla for the correct placement of implants. Autologous bone is considered the gold standard, but has a high rate of resorption and morbidity, leading to other alternatives such as autologous tooth, with good results in regenerative procedures. This case report evaluates at the clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric level the use of the autologous tooth in maxillary sinus elevation and the behaviour of two implants placed in a delayed manner. Case report: The case is presented of a 48-year-old woman who came for consultation to replace the right posterior sector. The extraction of 4.8 as a donor tooth was performed to use it as a biomaterial in a lateral access sinus elevation, placing two implants six months after the intervention, and evaluating them six months after their prosthetic loading. Discussion: The autologous tooth in this case report showed 30.56% of newly formed bone following a six-month wait, with better results than when allografts and xenografts were used. In addition, different cultural and ethnic aspects support the acceptance of the autologous tooth by patients. However, more longterm studies are needed to evaluate the stability of this type of graft in maxillary sinus elevation. Conclusions: The autologous tooth in the sinus elevation offers biocompatibility, low incidence of complications and good patient acceptance, with good clinical and radiographic behaviour of the implants, despite the short time elapsed in this case after loading.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Tooth , Dentin , Maxillary Sinus , Tooth Extraction , Dental Implants
2.
Cient. dent. (Ed. impr.) ; 20(2): 105-112, mayo- ago. 2023. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-225304

ABSTRACT

Introducción: tras las extracciones, se producen una serie de cambios dimensio nales en sentido horizontal y vertical de la cresta alveolar, los cuales pueden ser minimizados mediante algunas técnicas quirúrgicas, como la preservación alveo lar, que utiliza diferentes sustitutos óseos, entre los que se encuentra actualmente el injerto autólogo de diente. Caso clínico: se presenta el caso clínico de una mujer de 61 años, que acudió a consulta presentando dolor intenso en la zona del segundo premolar superior de recho (1.5). Se realizó la exodoncia del 1.5, usándose como diente donante para realizar una preservación del alveolo tras la extracción. Cuatro meses tras el proce dimiento, se colocó un implante y se tomó una biopsia para realizar un análisis histo morfométrico. Un año tras la carga del im plante se observaron buenos resultados clínicos y radiográficos. Discusión: el diente y el tejido óseo tie nen similitudes en su composición quími ca, tanto en sus componentes inorgáni cos y orgánicos como en la cantidad de agua. En cuanto al contenido orgánico destacan los factores de crecimiento, la proteína morfogenética ósea 2 (BMP-2) y el colágeno tipo 1, dotando al diente como biomaterial de la propiedad de os teoinducción. El empleo del diente como sustituto en preservación alveolar consi gue porcentajes altos de hueso neofor mado, variando entre 37,55% cuando se usa el diente completo, al 48,40% usando dentina desmineralizada. Además de los buenos resultados histomorfométricos, goza de una buena aceptación por parte de los pacientes, fundamentalmente en determinadas ra zas o culturas, y consigue una reducción de las dimensio nes óseas evaluadas mediante escáner de haz cónico. Sin embargo, requiere un tiempo de preparación, que aumenta si el diente tiene restauraciones o tratamientos de conduc tos asociados (AU)


Introduction: following tooth extraction, horizontal and vertical resorption of bone volume occurs, but they can be reduced by many surgical procedures, such as alveolar ridge preservation, which uses different bone substitutes, being one of them autogenous tooth-graft. Clinical case: a 61-year-old woman is presented, who came to private dental clinic presenting intense pain in the area of an upper bicuspid of the first quadrant (1.5). Exodontia of the 1.5 was performed, using it as a donor tooth to obtain the biomaterial to preserve its alveolus. After 4 months re-entry was performed and an implant was placed, harvesting a bone biopsy for histomorphometric analysis. One year post-loading, good clinical and radiographic results were shown. Discussion: human bone and tooth have similarities in their chemical composition, both in their inorganic and organic components and in the amount of water. The organic content, growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and type 1 collagen stand out, give the tooth the property of osteoinduction. The use of the tooth as a substitute in alveolar preservation achieves high percentages of neoformed bone, varying between 37.55% when the whole tooth is used, to 48.40% using demineralized dentin. In addition, it is well accepted by patients, especially in certain races or cultures, and achieves a reduction in bone dimensions evaluated by cone beam computed tomography. However, it has a drawback, requiring a long preparation time, which increases if the tooth has associated restorations or root canals. Conclusions: Autologous tooth-graft has a high biocompatibility, a low rate of intraoperative complications and good patient acceptance. It requires 25 minutes for preparation, which increases if there are restorations, root canals and caries. The percentage of vital bone obtained in the present clinical case shows new bone formation of 20% 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Alveolar Process , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation , Tooth Socket/surgery , Dental Implantation/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36011753

ABSTRACT

This systematic literature review set out to investigate the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and dental implants in terms of survival rates, marginal bone loss, and associated complications. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, performing an electronic search in four databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus), complemented by a manual search up to April 2022. Four articles were selected for analysis. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale tool was used to assess the quality of evidence of cohort studies, and the Cochrane bias assessment tool was used to assess the quality of evidence of randomized clinical trials. The study included 1089 patients restored with 1984 dental implants, with follow-up periods ranging from 20-240 months. Cases presenting lower serum vitamin D levels obtained slightly worse results in terms of marginal bone loss. Longer follow-up periods are needed in order to determine whether serum vitamin D levels affect implant survival rates and osseointegration over time.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Databases, Factual , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Survival Rate , Vitamin D
4.
Materials (Basel) ; 14(18)2021 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34576516

ABSTRACT

In thirteen different dental clinics in Singapore, Spain, Czech Republic and Italy, 504 patients were selected, and 483 dental implants were placed in maxillary sites after alveolar socket preservation (ASP) procedures with an autologous demineralized tooth extracted as graft material from an innovative Tooth Transformer device was obtained. All procedures used were reported in n°638 Ethical Committee surgical protocol of University of Chieti and approved. After 4 months, at dental implant placing, bone biopsies were performed to evaluate the histologic outcomes, and 12 months after implant loading, global implant survival rate, failure percentage and peri-implant bone loss were detected. After ASP, only 27 post-operative complications were observed and after 4 months, bone biopsy histomorphometric analysis showed a high percentage of bone volume (BV) 43.58 (±12.09), and vital new bone (NB) 32.38 (±17.15) with an absence of inflammation or necrosis areas. Twelve months after loading, only 10 dental implants failed (2.3%), with a 98.2% overall implant survival rate, nine cases showed mucositis (1.8%) and eight showed peri-implantitis (1.6%). At mesial sites, 0.43 mm (±0.83) of bone loss around the implants was detected and 0.23 mm (±0.38) at the distal sites with an average value of 0.37 mm (±0.68) (p > 0.568). Several studies with a longer follow-up will be necessary to confirm the preliminary data observed. However, clinical results seem to suggest that the post-extraction socket preservation procedure using innovative demineralized autologous tooth-derived biomaterial may be a predictable procedure to produce new vital bone able to support dental implant rehabilitation of maxilla edentulous sites.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...