Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 51(1): 229-41, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23072858

ABSTRACT

Total quality in laboratory medicine should be defined as the guarantee that each activity throughout the total testing process is correctly performed, providing valuable medical decision-making and effective patient care. In the past decades, a 10-fold reduction in the analytical error rate has been achieved thanks to improvements in both reliability and standardization of analytical techniques, reagents, and instrumentation. Notable advances in information technology, quality control and quality assurance methods have also assured a valuable contribution for reducing diagnostic errors. Nevertheless, several lines of evidence still suggest that most errors in laboratory diagnostics fall outside the analytical phase, and the pre- and postanalytical steps have been found to be much more vulnerable. This collective paper, which is the logical continuum of the former already published in this journal 2 years ago, provides additional contribution to risk management in the preanalytical phase and is a synopsis of the lectures of the 2nd European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)-Becton Dickinson (BD) European Conference on Preanalytical Phase meeting entitled "Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust" (Zagreb, Croatia, 1-2 March 2013). The leading topics that will be discussed include quality indicators for preanalytical phase, phlebotomy practices for collection of blood gas analysis and pediatric samples, lipemia and blood collection tube interferences, preanalytical requirements of urinalysis, molecular biology hemostasis and platelet testing, as well as indications on best practices for safe blood collection. Auditing of the preanalytical phase by ISO assessors and external quality assessment for preanalytical phase are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Chemistry, Clinical/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Clinical Medicine/standards , Child , Humans , Molecular Biology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Urinalysis
2.
Public Health Rep ; 123(1): 52-60, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18348480

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety of room occupants in the Tuberculosis Ultraviolet Shelter Study (TUSS), a double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial of upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) at 14 homeless shelters in six U.S. cities from 1997 to 2004. METHODS: Data collection involved administering questionnaires regarding eye and skin irritation to a total of 3,611 staff and homeless study subjects. RESULTS: Among these subjects, there were 223 reports of eye or skin symptoms. During the active UV period, 95 questionnaires (6%) noted such symptoms, and during the placebo period, 92 questionnaires (6%) did so. In the 36 remaining cases, either the UV period when symptoms took place was unknown or the symptoms spanned both periods. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of reports of symptoms between the active and placebo periods. One definite instance of UV-related keratoconjunctivitis occurred, resulting from a placement of a bunk bed in a dormitory where a single bed had been used when the UV fixtures were first installed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that careful application of upper-room UVGI can be achieved without an apparent increase in the incidence of the most common side effects of accidental UV overexposure.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/methods , Keratoconjunctivitis/etiology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/radiation effects , Photosensitivity Disorders/etiology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/prevention & control
3.
Med Teach ; 26(7): 615-20, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15763851

ABSTRACT

Academic physicians must master the elements of curriculum development and evaluation specific to defined competencies in postgraduate medical education. Six fellows in primary care medicine, working as a peer group with a faculty mentor, designed and evaluated a distance-learning project that included resident physicians. Professionalism, interpersonal skills and systems-based medical practice skills were measured with original instruments designed by the peer group. By the process of evaluation and revision in a peer-group setting and with mentorship from program faculty, experiential learning enhanced the training of future academic physicians. This paper describes the background, process and statistical results of their work.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers , Clinical Competence , Community Medicine/education , Education, Distance , Internship and Residency/methods , Primary Health Care , Community Health Services , Curriculum , Humans , Mentors , Peer Group , Program Development , Program Evaluation , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...