ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Guideline adherence in radiotherapy is crucial for maintaining treatment quality and consistency, particularly in non-trial patient settings where most treatments occur. The study aimed to assess the impact of guideline changes on treatment planning practices and compare manual registry data accuracy with treatment planning data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilised the DBCG RT Nation cohort, a collection of breast cancer radiotherapy data in Denmark, to evaluate adherence to guidelines from 2008 to 2016. The cohort included 7448 high-risk breast cancer patients. National guideline changes included, fractionation, introduction of respiratory gating, irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes, use of the simultaneous integrated boost technique and inclusion of the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery in delineation practice. Methods for structure name mapping, laterality detection, detection of temporal changes in population mean lung volume, and dose evaluation were presented and applied. Manually registered treatment characteristic data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Database for comparison. RESULTS: The study found immediate and consistent adherence to guideline changes across Danish radiotherapy centres. Treatment practices before guideline implementation were documented and showed a variation among centres. Discrepancies between manual registry data and actual treatment planning data were as high as 10% for some measures. CONCLUSION: National guideline changes could be detected in the routine treatment data, with a high degree of compliance and short implementation time. Data extracted from treatment planning data files provides a more accurate and detailed characterisation of treatments and guideline adherence than medical register data.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported as a late effect following radiation therapy (RT) of early breast cancer (BC). This study aims to report individual RT doses to the heart and cardiac substructures in patients treated with CT-based RT and to investigate if a dose-response relationship between RT dose and CAD exists using modern radiation therapy techniques. METHODS: Patients registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group database from 2005 to 2016 with CT-based RT were eligible. Among 15,765 patients, the study included 204 with CAD after irradiation (cases) and 408 matched controls. Individual planning CTs were retrieved, the heart and cardiac substructures were delineated and dose-volume parameters were extracted. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 7.3 years (IQR: 4.6-10.0). Among cases, the median mean heart dose was 1.6 Gy (IQR 0.2-6.1) and 0.8 Gy (0.1-2.9) for left-sided and right-sided patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest RT doses were observed in the left ventricle and left anterior descending coronary artery for left-sided RT and in the right atrium and the right coronary artery after right-sided RT. The highest left-minus-right dose-difference was located in the distal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery where also the highest left-versus-right ratio of events was observed. However, no significant difference in the distribution of CAD was observed by laterality. Furthermore, no significant differences in the dose-volume parameters were observed for cases versus controls. CONCLUSIONS: CAD tended to occur in the part of the heart with the highest left-minus- right dose difference, however, no significant risk of CAD was observed at 7 years' median follow-up.
