Eocene Patagonia fossils of the daisy family.

Fossil capitula and pollen grains of Asteraceae from the Eocene of Patagonia, southern Argentina, exhibit morphological features recognized today in taxa, such as Mutisioideae and Carduoideae, that are phylogenetically close to the root of the asteracean tree. This fossil supports the hypothesis of a South American origin of Asteraceae and an Eocene age of divergence and suggests that an ancestral stock of Asteraceae may have formed part of a geoflora developed in southern Gondwana before the establishment of effective dispersal barriers within this landmass.

[Costs of dialysis in hospitalised patients with acute or chronic renal failure, according to area of treatment]. / Costi dei trattamenti dialitici condotti in aree operative differenziate in pazienti ospedalizzati, acuti e cronici.

BACKGROUND: In Italy, dialysis reimbursement is regulated by the "Tariffario delle prestazioni ambulatoriali" (G.U. N 216, 14/9/1996), which does not take into account separately the dialysis sessions performed in hospitalised patients. In these cases the dialysis activity is considered within the final DRG (Diagnosis Related Group). Aim of the study was an analysis of production costs of dialysis performed in hospitalised patients, according to the setting in which dialysis is performed (Intensive Care Units (ICUs), other Units, hospital dialysis ward). METHODS: The direct production costs were assessed by the "bottom-up" technique logic (cost definition from the single elements needed for producing the treatment) referring to specific Cost Centres. The main items considered were health-care staff, dialysis supplies and hardware, blood tests, dialysis data recording and transmission. RESULTS: During the year 2000, there were 4,450 treatments performed in 490 patients. They included 924 haemodialyses in ICUs; 2,531 in the nephrology hospital dialysis ward; 602 peritoneal dialysis treatments in ICUs-other wards, 393 in the nephrology ward. Direct cost per haemodialysis treatment ranged from 276.05 E (UF) to 413.46 E (HF) in ICU, from 170.47 E (Bicarbonate Haemodialysis) to 275.36 E (Slow Haemofiltration) in hospital dialysis ward; for peritoneal dialysis between 128.95 E (CAPD in dialysis ward) and 282.10 E (CAPD in ICU/other Units). During the year 2000, the global cost of production was 1,038,346.65 E. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of dialysis in hospitalised patients is high. A dedicated budget is needed to avoid deficits, particularly in highly specialised Units of large referral hospitals.

Patient knowledge and interest on dialysis efficiency: a survey.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic compliance is fundamental on dialysis; however following a therapy requires a prior understanding of it. Aim of the study was to assess the need and interest for information on dialysis efficiency and to prepare a dedicated teaching tool. METHODS: 72 patients, on hemodialysis in two limited-care satellite units, were given a questionnaire testing knowledge and interest on dialysis efficiency. In a subsequent second phase, following patients' suggestions, a cartoon book was prepared and opinions recorded. RESULTS: 63 patients' returned the questionnaire. 79.4% had basic knowledge on routine blood tests, 30.1% were aware of their specific meaning. All patients asked for further information, preferring books to other media. The book "Kt/V as cartoon" was distributed; 71.2% read it, 93% scored it as good-very good. In the Unit employing flexible dialysis schedules, 22/42 patients increased dialysis time. CONCLUSIONS: Despite insufficient knowledge on dialysis efficiency, patient interest is high. An educational program is feasible and may also give practical results, such as self-increase in dialysis time.

[Daily dialysis: evaluation of the first year of experience at home and in a limited care center]. / La dialisi quotidiana: valutazione del primo anno di esperienza a domicilio ed in un centro ad assistenza limitata.

BACKGROUND: Among self dialysis treatments, daily dialysis is encountering a growing interest. Aim of this study was to evaluate results of the first year of daily dialysis in our Center. METHODS: Since November 1998, twelve patients started daily dialysis. One patient started RRT on daily dialysis; one patient was in training; 8 were on home dialysis, 3 in the limited care center. Selection of patients was performed according to wide acceptance criteria as for age (range 33-61 years), dialysis follow-up (range 1-23 years), comorbidity (=/>1 comorbid factor present in 8). Dialysis schedule consisted of 6 sessions per week (2-3 hours), blood flow 250-320 ml/min, individualized dialysate. Occasional shift to 3-4 times per week were allowed for logistic or working reasons. RESULTS: Results were analyzed taking into account patient satisfaction and main clinical parameters. In 9/12 the choice of treatment resulted from both clinical reasons and patient preferences, while in 3 was due to clinical indications (1/3 dropped out). The main reasons of choice were logistic or research of the best treatment. The most common fears regarded fistula and needle puncturing. Despite the time unconvenience, the rapidly regained well being was the reason for choosing this treatment. Also in this relatively short follow-up the favorable results reported as for weight gain, blood pressure control and metabolic pattern are confirmed. The few side effects were multifactorial (fistula thrombosis after blood pressure normalization, 2 recurrences of atrial fibrillation). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, daily dialysis resulted also in our centre as a promising alternative even in difficult patients.

Daily dialysis Kt/V and flexible schedules: is it possible to control efficiency, when and how?

BACKGROUND: Daily hemodialysis is a promising treatment schedule but uniform criteria for defining efficiency are lacking. METHODS: On our daily dialysis (DD) schedule, duration is flexible (2-3 hours, patients are free to add up to 30 min/session), Qb 250-350 mL/min; dialyser 1.6-1.8 m2. Study was performed on 12 pts on DD for > or = 2 months, with > or = 4 Kt/V on subsequent days, tested in the same laboratory. GOAL: To evaluate variability and identify a simple method for weekly calculation, Kt/V was assessed for 133 sessions. RESULTS: On flexible DD, variability of Kt/V-session is high (relative error 4.9%-22%). On flexible schedules, within the time range chosen (2-3 hours) variability of average hourly Kt/V is lower (standard deviation: min (0.014; max (0.052 hour, relative error 4.9%-10%) allowing calculation of weekly Kt/V (averaging 3 sessions: relative error < 6%) suitable for clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible schedules, allowing patients to increase treatment time, are an interesting clinical option, but a challenge for Kt/V assessment.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura after 20 years of renal replacement therapy.

While the clinical impact of the impaired immune response, commonly described in chronic dialysis patients, is still a matter of discussion, it is usually considered that immunological diseases tend to become progressively less active after the start of regular renal replacement therapy (RRT). We reported a case of Henoch-Schonlein Purpura in a 51-year-old male, on RRT for 20 years, 8 on dialysis and 12 with renal graft, because of ESRD of unknown origin (chronic glomerulonephritis?). The acute onset of the syndrome, presenting purpuric rash, abdominal discomfort and asymmetric joint pain with edema and local signs of acute inflammation, was followed by several relapses over a 2 years period. This biopsy proven diagnosis offered an explanation for his chronic renal failure; furthermore, we conclude that, possibly because of the usually good correction of uremic immunodepression by efficient dialysis (this patient's Kt/V ranged from 1.1 to 1.3 according to Lowrie's formula), the possibility of immune diseases should be carefully considered even in long long-term RRT patients.

Modelling the "ideal" self care--limited care dialysis center.

Limited care dialysis is an interesting option, which has gained attention in several settings because of the aging of the uremic cohort. The aim of this study was to assess its potential in the Piedmont region in northern Italy, evaluating patients' and care-givers' preferences and testing them in a mathematical model of organisation. The study was conducted in the satellite unit of a university hospital (200-210 dialysis patients), following 35 patients (15 at home, 20 in the center, 10 on daily dialysis). Opinions were collected with a questionnaire and features identified were empirically tested through a simulation model. Most patients (34/35) preferred a small unit, with a stable caring team. Further options were flexibility of dialysis schedule, multiple treatment options, integrated center/home care. These needs could be met by a flexible organization including conventional dialysis (3/week) and daily dialysis (6/week). We employed a simulation model (ARENA software) to calculate the nurses required for each shift and the opening hours and best schedule for the unit. Addition of daily dialysis (2-3 hours) to two conventional 4-5 hour sessions to increased the number of patients followed or "spared" beds, ensuring flexibility. According to patients' best choice (7 dialysis stations), and to the recorded calls, the needs are for two nurses per shift, two shifts per day and six nurses for up to 30 patients in limited care. In conclusion, small centers with flexible schedules can tailor dialysis to patients' needs. A managerial approach is valuable for testing cost/benefit ratios in specific contexts.

Education as a clinical tool for self-dialysis.

Therapeutic compliance and patient education are presently considered crucial parts of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy. In the center where Italian home and self-care dialysis treatment started, an education program was designed as multi-step pathway--following patients from chronic renal failure to dialysis and eventual graft--employing lessons, booklets, and books. Each step was validated in various subsets of patients. Lessons involved two hours of informal discussion on the main aspects of ESRD and renal replacement therapy (RRT); booklets were created from tape recordings of the lessons. Patient participation was good, with 28 of 33 patients on charge in the center for 6 months or more taking part in more than one lesson in 1999. In 16 of 16 patients who answered a questionnaire after two lessons, expressed opinion was "good" to "fair." All asked for further material. With regard to books, 500 copies of the book What does dialysis mean? were given out in the region; this book was validated in 22 patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18 on hemodialysis (HD). It helped patients to accept dialysis in 65% of cases and to comprehend it in 90%. Four thousand copies of the book Stories, containing 18 interviews on transplantation, were printed, and this book was validated in 21 patients on self-care and 35 on hospital dialysis (potential candidates for graft). Of 56 patients, 53 asked for further material; 19 changed their initial opinion (10 choose transplantation, despite initial skepticism; 9 put off transplantation, despite initial acceptance). On a local scale, the program led 12 of 18 new patients, who followed at least part of the program, to choose self-dialysis (PD, home, and self-care dialysis).

[Research potential of a regional registry]. / Potenzialità di ricerca di un registro regionale.

BACKGROUND: The need for data bank gathering information in dialysis patients is as old as dialysis. Dialysis Registries presently active are characterized by different policies of data gathering (large vs small number of information) and of use (research vs economical or clinical purposes). Aim of the work was a discussion on the use of a Regional Registry (RPDT, Regional Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation of Piedmont, Italy), gathering since 1981 a wide set of information (about 80 items) on all patients treated in a relatively small area (about 4,300,000 inhabitants). METHODS: Two researches were selected: the first includes patients treated for > or = 20 years by RRT. Cases were identified on the basis of RPDT data and an inquiry regarding all patients was performed, with specific interest on comorbidity. The second includes diabetic patients on regular RRT, a sample of which was further analyzed in high detail. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: While a Regional Registry, even gathering a wide set of data is unable to answer to the most qualitative questions, such as quality of life, its archives are a powerful tool to identify cases. Furthermore, ad hoc inquiries may represent a way to control quality of data or to test new fields to be studied. In the case of patients with long RRT follow-up, comorbidity questions were tested before being included on RPDT. In the case of a sample of diabetic patients, type of diabetes and cause of ESRD were controlled. This biunivocal relationship between clinical work-up and epidemiological archives may often interest future perspectives.