ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapeutic treatments targeting amyloid-ß plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are associated with the presence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with oedema or effusion (ARIA-E), whose detection and classification is crucial to evaluate subjects enrolled in clinical trials. PURPOSE: To investigate the applicability of subtraction MRI in the ARIA-E detection using an established ARIA-E-rating scale. METHODS: We included 75 AD patients receiving bapineuzumab treatment, including 29 ARIA-E cases. Five neuroradiologists rated their brain MRI-scans with and without subtraction images. The accuracy of evaluating the presence of ARIA-E, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and specific agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Subtraction resulted in higher sensitivity (0.966) and lower specificity (0.970) than native images (0.959, 0.991, respectively). Individual rater detection was excellent. ICC scores ranged from excellent to good, except for gyral swelling (moderate). Excellent negative and good positive specific agreement among all ARIA-E imaging features was reported in both groups. Combining sulcal hyperintensity and gyral swelling significantly increased positive agreement for subtraction images. CONCLUSION: Subtraction MRI has potential as a visual aid increasing the sensitivity of ARIA-E assessment. However, in order to improve its usefulness isotropic acquisition and enhanced training are required. The ARIA-E rating scale may benefit from combining sulcal hyperintensity and swelling. KEY POINTS: ⢠Subtraction technique can improve detection amyloid-related imaging-abnormalities with edema/effusion in Alzheimer's patients. ⢠The value of ARIA-E detection, classification and monitoring using subtraction was assessed. ⢠Validation of an established ARIA-E rating scale, recommendations for improvement are reported. ⢠Complementary statistical methods were employed to measure accuracy, inter-rater-reliability and specific agreement.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/complications , Amyloidosis/diagnosis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Brain Edema/diagnosis , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Amyloidosis/complications , Amyloidosis/drug therapy , Brain Edema/drug therapy , Brain Edema/etiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Male , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapeutic agents against amyloid beta (Aß) are associated with adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema and effusion (ARIA-E). Recently, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rating scale was developed for ARIA-E detection and classification. The aim of this study was to validate the use of this rating scale in a larger patient group with multiple raters. METHODS: MRI scans of 75 patients (29 with known ARIA-E and 46 control subjects) were analyzed by five neuroradiologists with different degrees of expertise, according to the ARIA-E rating scale. For each patient, we included a baseline and a follow-up fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image. Interrater agreement was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: On average, 4.1% of the ARIA-E cases were missed. We observed a high interrater agreement for scores of sulcal hyperintensity (SH; ICC = .915; 95% CI 85-95) and for the combined scores of the 2 ARIA-E findings, parenchymal hyperintensity (PH) and SH (ICC = .878; 95% CI 79-93). A slightly lower agreement for PH (ICC = .678; 95% CI 51-81) was noted. CONCLUSION: The ARIA-E rating scale is a simple tool to evaluate the extent of ARIA-E in patients recruited into Aß-lowering therapeutic trials. It shows high interrater agreement among raters with different degrees of expertise.
