Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Diabetes ; 18(8): 874-882, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28117539

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The combination of high blood pressure and hyperglycemia contributes to the development of diabetic complications. Ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure (ABPM) is seen as standard to assess blood pressure (BP) regulation. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated 24-hour BP regulation in 3529 children with type 1 diabetes, representing 5.6% of the patients <20 years of age documented in the DPV registry, and studied the influence of BP parameters including pulse pressure (PP) and blood pressure variability (BPV) on microalbuminuria (MA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). RESULTS: BP was increased in this selected cohort of children with diabetes compared to healthy German controls (standard deviation score (SDS) day: systolic BP (SBP) +0.06, mean arterial pressure (MAP) +0.08, PP +0.3; night: SBP +0.6, diastolic BP +0.6, MAP +0.8), while daytime diastolic BP (SDS -0.2) and dipping of SBP and MAP were reduced (SBP -1.1 SDS, MAP 12.4% vs 19.4%), PP showed reverse dipping (-0.7 SDS). Children with microvascular complications had by +0.1 to +0.75 SDS higher BP parameters, except of nocturnal PP in MA and diurnal and nocturnal PP in DR. Reverse dipping of PP was more pronounced in the children with MA (-5.1% vs -0.8%) and DR (-2.6% vs -1.0%). BP alteration was stronger in girls and increased with age. CONCLUSION: There is an early and close link between 24-hour blood pressure regulation and the development of diabetic complications not only for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP but also for the derived BP parameter PP and BPV in our selected patients.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/etiology , Blood Pressure , Circadian Rhythm , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/physiopathology , Diabetic Retinopathy/etiology , Adolescent , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Female , Humans , Male
2.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes ; 119(9): 544-8, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22006181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that overweight children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) demonstrate a lower response to growth hormone (GH) as a result of a misclassification since obesity is associated with lower GH peaks in stimulation tests. METHODS: Anthropometric data, response, and responsiveness to GH in the first year of treatment were compared in 1.712 prepubertal children with GHD from the German KIGS database according to BMI (underweight=group A, normal weight=group B, overweight=group C) (median age: group A, B, C: 7.3, 7.28, and 8.4 years). RESULTS: Maximum GH levels to tests (median: group A, B, C: 5.8, 5.8, and 4.0 µg/ml) were significantly lower in group C. IGF-I SDS levels were not different between the groups. Growth velocity in the first year of GH treatment was significantly lower in the underweight cohort (median: group A, B, C: 8.2, 8.8, and 9.0 cm/yr), while the gain in height was not different between groups. The difference between observed and predicted growth velocity expressed as Studentized residuals was not significantly different between groups. Separating the 164 overweight children into obese children (BMI>97th centile; n=71) and moderate overweight children (BMI>90th to 97th centile, n=93) demonstrated no significant difference in any parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight prepubertal children with idiopathic GHD demonstrated similar levels of responsiveness to GH treatment compared to normal weight children. Furthermore, the IGF-I levels were low in overweight children. Therefore, a misclassification of GHD in overweight prepubertal children within the KIGS database seems unlikely. The first year growth prediction models can be applied to overweight and obese GHD children.


Subject(s)
Body Height/drug effects , Child Development/drug effects , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Human Growth Hormone/deficiency , Human Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Overweight/complications , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Germany , Humans , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis , Male , Models, Biological , Obesity/blood , Obesity/complications , Overweight/blood , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Thinness/blood , Thinness/complications
3.
Z Rheumatol ; 70(10): 844-52, 2011 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21989975

ABSTRACT

The measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) was established to judge the fracture risk in an individual. The most commonly used densitometric technique DXA is a two-dimensional method and reports BMD (bone mass/projection area), which increases during growth. Bone mineral density (in g/cm(3)), however, is almost stable and does not change with age or height. To analyze the data special pediatric references including data on age, sex and ethnicity are necessary as well as correction for height. Bone forms a unit with muscle. Bone responds to mechanical loading with increase in bone size and therefore adapts to the biomechanical needs. Therefore, interpretation of bone development data requires data on muscle development.The indication for bone mineral density measurement and result reporting should be made by and together with a pediatric specialist. The diagnosis of osteoporosis should not be made based solely on densitometric measurements. History of low trauma fracture is an important aspect for the definition. Besides DXA there exist further methods with advantages and disadvantages.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Bone Development , Densitometry/methods , Fractures, Spontaneous/diagnosis , Fractures, Spontaneous/physiopathology , Adolescent , Child , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...