Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 36(5): 620-626, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37614850

ABSTRACT

Background: Recent studies have shown deficiencies in resident knowledge concerning transgender healthcare. However, there has not been an updated survey examining transgender healthcare training by medical residency directors. We assessed whether accredited residency programs in the United States and Canada were providing education on the healthcare needs of transgender patients. Methods: We performed an exploratory descriptive survey study in 2022 of residency programs in the United States and Canada to assess residency education on transgender health using program directors listed in the website directory of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Results: Out of 1680 residency program directors, 160 programs responded (response rate, 10%). Among the residency programs, education in transgender health was taught periodically throughout the curriculum (52.5%), in discrete modules (34.4%), or not taught at all (10.6%). However, 60% of residency program directors who responded reported that their program lacked any clinical rotation in which residents directly work with transgender patients. The most common areas of transgender care omitted from residency education on transgender health were barriers associated with chronic illness and mental health. Conclusion: There remains a need for robust transgender medical training in residency programs through clinical rotations on transgender health.

2.
J AOAC Int ; 106(3): 662-670, 2023 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610990

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reveal® 3-D for Gluten is an immunochromatographic assay for the qualitative detection of gluten in environmental samples. The test uses monoclonal antibodies reactive to prolamins in wheat. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate the Reveal 3-D test for detection of gluten in clean-in-place rinse and swabs from a stainless steel surface. METHODS: Elements of the study included food selectivity and interference testing, matrix testing, an assay robustness study, and reagent stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing. Wheat flour was used as the spiking material for all matrixes. RESULTS: In selectivity and interference testing, nine target matrixes all tested positive and 36 of 39 non-target matrixes tested negative. Almond flour, sesame flour, and cornstarch produced positive results as 100% commodities; reactivity can be eliminated with dilution or by testing without use of food extraction buffer, which is not a standard part of the environmental testing method. With a gluten spike at 9.3 mg/kg, chestnut flour, guar gum, and xanthan gum as 100% commodities inhibited the ability of the assay to detect gluten when tested without dilution. In quaternary ammonium clean-in-place rinse and swabs from stainless steel, 100% positive results were obtained at levels of 2.8 mg/kg and 4.7 µg/100 cm2, respectively. Results of independent laboratory testing of swabs from stainless steel supported those of internal trials. Robustness testing showed that introducing variations to three operating parameters simultaneously had no adverse effect on assay performance. In the reagent stability study, data supported kit expiration dating of 11 months. CONCLUSION: Results of the current study show that the Reveal test is an accurate and reliable method for qualitative detection of gluten in select clean-in-place rinse and environmental samples. HIGHLIGHTS: The Reveal test was able to detect gluten at levels of 2.8 ppm in clean-in-place rinse and 4.7 µg/100 cm2 in swabs from stainless steel.


Subject(s)
Glutens , Stainless Steel , Glutens/analysis , Stainless Steel/analysis , Flour/analysis , Triticum , Food Microbiology
3.
J Nurses Prof Dev ; 39(2): 92-96, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674398

ABSTRACT

Methods of critical care (CC) education were quickly challenged when faced with the COVID-19 pandemic requiring social distancing and limited group sizes. A new delivery model was designed-one that included a smart video conferencing and recording system and an online platform to access education. Over the course of 4 weeks, the CC program was revamped to meet the immediate needs of CC new hires coming to this tertiary and quaternary medical center.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Critical Care , Videoconferencing
4.
J AOAC Int ; 105(2): 483-491, 2022 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34599817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Soleris®E. coli is an automated, growth-based method for detection and semi-quantitative determination of Escherichia coli in foods. The method can be used in dilute-to-specification (threshold) or presence/absence modes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate four modifications to the method: (1) a change in the vial detection window plug composition from agar to agarose to improve plug consistency and robustness, (2) a change in pre-enrichment incubation time for presence/absence testing from 6 h to 18-24 h, (3) a change in vial incubation temperature from 44.5 to 43.5°C, and (4) incorporation of a simple direct-from-vial confirmation test as an alternative to traditional procedures. METHODS: Elements of the study included inclusivity/exclusivity testing, matrix testing in comparison to the ISO 7251:2005 reference method, reagent stability/lot-to-lot consistency testing, and an independent laboratory study. RESULTS: In inclusivity testing, all 55 Escherichia coli strains tested produced positive results. In exclusivity testing, 30 of 31 strains of other bacterial species produced negative results, the sole exception being a strain of Enterobacter cloacae. In internal and independent laboratory matrix testing of mozzarella cheese, condensed milk, pasteurized liquid egg, and frozen green beans, results showed no significant differences in performance of the Soleris and reference methods with two exceptions, one in which the Soleris method produced more positive results, and one in which the reference method produced more positive results. CONCLUSION: Performance characteristics of the modified Soleris E. coli method are consistent with those of the original validated method. HIGHLIGHTS: The Soleris E. coli method offers improvements in ease of use and reagent robustness.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli , Food Microbiology , Animals , Bacteria , Milk
5.
Drug Discov Today ; 24(2): 624-628, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30468877

ABSTRACT

Nonclinical tests are considered crucial for understanding the safety of investigational medicines. However, the effective translation from nonclinical to human application is limited and must be improved. Drug development stakeholders are working to advance human-based in vitro and in silico methods that may be more predictive of human efficacy and safety in vivo because they enable scientists to model the direct interaction of drugs with human cells, tissues, and biological processes. Here, we recommend test-neutral regulations; increased funding for development and integration of human-based approaches; support for existing initiatives that advance human-based approaches; evaluation of new approaches using human data; establishment of guidelines for procuring human cells and tissues for research; and additional training and educational opportunities in human-based approaches.


Subject(s)
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Animal Testing Alternatives , Humans , Inventions , Patient Safety
6.
Arch Toxicol ; 91(7): 2551-2575, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28501917

ABSTRACT

Systematic reviews, pioneered in the clinical field, provide a transparent, methodologically rigorous and reproducible means of summarizing the available evidence on a precisely framed research question. Having matured to a well-established approach in many research fields, systematic reviews are receiving increasing attention as a potential tool for answering toxicological questions. In the larger framework of evidence-based toxicology, the advantages and obstacles of, as well as the approaches for, adapting and adopting systematic reviews to toxicology are still being explored. To provide the toxicology community with a starting point for conducting or understanding systematic reviews, we herein summarized available guidance documents from various fields of application. We have elaborated on the systematic review process by breaking it down into ten steps, starting with planning the project, framing the question, and writing and publishing the protocol, and concluding with interpretation and reporting. In addition, we have identified the specific methodological challenges of toxicological questions and have summarized how these can be addressed. Ultimately, this primer is intended to stimulate scientific discussions of the identified issues to fuel the development of toxicology-specific methodology and to encourage the application of systematic review methodology to toxicological issues.


Subject(s)
Meta-Analysis as Topic , Toxicology/methods
8.
Case Rep Gastrointest Med ; 2017: 6432063, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29435375

ABSTRACT

Constipation is a common condition. Hydrogen peroxide enemas have rarely been reported as a home remedy for constipation in the pediatric age group. We present a case report and literature review of hydrogen peroxide induced colitis in pediatric siblings, aged 2 years and 9 years. The siblings presented with vomiting and bloody diarrhea an hour following the enema. Physical exam, vital signs, blood, and electrolyte counts were normal, but CT scans showed mucosal thickening of the rectum and colon. Their symptoms resolved after oral intake was curtailed and fluids were replaced intravenously. We discuss existing reports of complications from hydrogen peroxide enemas. Patients may present with abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. Onset of symptoms varied from minutes to a day and bowel ulceration with necrosis and perforation has occurred, although fatality is rare. Diagnostic tests included computed tomography (CT) scan, sigmoidoscopy, or biopsy. Recovery period ranged from 3 days to 8 months. Public education regarding the dangers of hydrogen peroxide enemas is needed.

9.
Toxicol Sci ; 155(1): 22-31, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780885

ABSTRACT

Future Tox III, a Society of Toxicology Contemporary Concepts in Toxicology workshop, was held in November 2015. Building upon Future Tox I and II, Future Tox III was focused on developing the high throughput risk assessment paradigm and taking the science of in vitro data and in silico models forward to explore the question-what progress is being made to address challenges in implementing the emerging big-data toolbox for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making. This article reports on the outcome of the workshop including 2 examples of where advancements in predictive toxicology approaches are being applied within Federal agencies, where opportunities remain within the exposome and AOP domains, and how collectively the toxicology community across multiple sectors can continue to bridge the translation from historical approaches to Tox21 implementation relative to risk assessment and regulatory decision-making.


Subject(s)
Toxicology , Animals , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Toxicity Tests
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 80: 9-24, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27211295

ABSTRACT

In 2014, the National Research Council (NRC) published Review of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Process that considers methods EPA uses for developing toxicity criteria for non-carcinogens. These criteria are the Reference Dose (RfD) for oral exposure and Reference Concentration (RfC) for inhalation exposure. The NRC Review suggested using Bayesian methods for application of uncertainty factors (UFs) to adjust the point of departure dose or concentration to a level considered to be without adverse effects for the human population. The NRC foresaw Bayesian methods would be potentially useful for combining toxicity data from disparate sources-high throughput assays, animal testing, and observational epidemiology. UFs represent five distinct areas for which both adjustment and consideration of uncertainty may be needed. NRC suggested UFs could be represented as Bayesian prior distributions, illustrated the use of a log-normal distribution to represent the composite UF, and combined this distribution with a log-normal distribution representing uncertainty in the point of departure (POD) to reflect the overall uncertainty. Here, we explore these suggestions and present a refinement of the methodology suggested by NRC that considers each individual UF as a distribution. From an examination of 24 evaluations from EPA's IRIS program, when individual UFs were represented using this approach, the geometric mean fold change in the value of the RfD or RfC increased from 3 to over 30, depending on the number of individual UFs used and the sophistication of the assessment. We present example calculations and recommendations for implementing the refined NRC methodology.


Subject(s)
Bayes Theorem , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Models, Statistical , Toxicity Tests/methods , Uncertainty , Administration, Oral , Animals , Computer Simulation , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Epidemiologic Methods , Hazardous Substances/pharmacokinetics , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Humans , Inhalation Exposure , Monte Carlo Method , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests/standards
11.
Toxicol Sci ; 152(1): 10-6, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27208075

ABSTRACT

The Evidence-based Toxicology Collaboration hosted a workshop on "The Emergence of Systematic Review and Related Evidence-based Approaches in Toxicology," on November 21, 2014 in Baltimore, Maryland. The workshop featured speakers from agencies and organizations applying systematic review approaches to questions in toxicology, speakers with experience in conducting systematic reviews in medicine and healthcare, and stakeholders in industry, government, academia, and non-governmental organizations. Based on the workshop presentations and discussion, here we address the state of systematic review methods in toxicology, historical antecedents in both medicine and toxicology, challenges to the translation of systematic review from medicine to toxicology, and thoughts on the way forward. We conclude with a recommendation that as various agencies and organizations adapt systematic review methods, they continue to work together to ensure that there is a harmonized process for how the basic elements of systematic review methods are applied in toxicology.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Toxicology , Animals , Humans , Biomedical Research/methods , Biomedical Research/standards , Consensus , Guidelines as Topic , Toxicology/methods , Toxicology/standards
12.
Environ Int ; 89-90: 110-28, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26827183

ABSTRACT

Single point estimates of human health hazard/toxicity values such as a reference dose (RfD) are generally used in chemical hazard and risk assessment programs for assessing potential risks associated with site- or use-specific exposures. The resulting point estimates are often used by risk managers for regulatory decision-making, including standard setting, determination of emission controls, and mitigation of exposures to chemical substances. Risk managers, as well as stakeholders (interested and affected parties), often have limited information regarding assumptions and uncertainty factors in numerical estimates of both hazards and risks. Further, the use of different approaches for addressing uncertainty, which vary in transparency, can lead to a lack of confidence in the scientific underpinning of regulatory decision-making. The overarching goal of this paper, which was developed from an invited participant workshop, is to offer five approaches for presenting toxicity values in a transparent manner in order to improve the understanding, consideration, and informed use of uncertainty by risk assessors, risk managers, and stakeholders. The five approaches for improving the presentation and communication of uncertainty are described using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study. These approaches will ensure transparency in the documentation, development, and use of toxicity values at EPA, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and other similar assessment programs in the public and private sector. Further empirical testing will help to inform the approaches that will work best for specific audiences and situations.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Information Services/organization & administration , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Humans , Information Services/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Uncertainty , United States
15.
Indian J Pediatr ; 81(2): 158-64, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24062268

ABSTRACT

Cushing syndrome is the constellation of signs and symptoms caused by protracted exposure to glucocorticoids. The most common cause of Cushing syndrome in children and adolescents is exogenous administration of glucocorticoids. Presenting features commonly include weight gain, growth retardation, hirsutism, obesity, striae, acne and hypertension. Almost invariably, linear growth is severely diminished, a factor which may be useful in differentiating between childhood obesity and Cushing syndrome. Diagnostic approaches are based on distinguishing between adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent and ACTH-independent etiologies, and consideration of the most likely diagnosis by age. Treatment modality is dependent upon etiology. After cure, important components of care include attention to linear growth, pubertal progression and body composition.


Subject(s)
Cushing Syndrome/diagnosis , ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/diagnosis , ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma/therapy , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adenoma/therapy , Adolescent , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Body Composition , Cushing Syndrome/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic/diagnosis , Humans , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Obesity/diagnosis , Petrosal Sinus Sampling , Saliva/chemistry
16.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 43(9): 753-84, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24040995

ABSTRACT

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Review of the Environmental Protection Agency's Draft IRIS Assessment of Formaldehyde proposed a "roadmap" for reform and improvement of the Agency's risk assessment process. Specifically, it called for development of a transparent and defensible methodology for weight-of-evidence (WoE) assessments. To facilitate development of an improved process, we developed a white paper that reviewed approximately 50 existing WoE frameworks, seeking insights from their variations and nominating best practices for WoE analyses of causation of chemical risks. Four phases of WoE analysis were identified and evaluated in each framework: (1) defining the causal question and developing criteria for study selection, (2) developing and applying criteria for review of individual studies, (3) evaluating and integrating evidence and (4) drawing conclusions based on inferences. We circulated the draft white paper to stakeholders and then held a facilitated, multi-disciplinary invited stakeholder workshop to broaden and deepen the discussion on methods, rationales, utility and limitations among the surveyed WoE frameworks. The workshop developed recommendations for improving the conduct of WoE evaluations. Based on the analysis of the 50 frameworks and discussions at the workshop, best practices in conducting WoE analyses were identified for each of the four phases. Many of these best practices noted from the analysis and workshop could be implemented immediately, while others may require additional refinement as part of the ongoing discussions for improving the scientific basis of chemical risk assessments.


Subject(s)
Ecotoxicology/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Ecotoxicology/standards , Humans , Public Health , United States , United States Environmental Protection Agency
18.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 109(50): 20274-9, 2012 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22315401

ABSTRACT

Following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, petroleum-related compounds and chemical dispersants were detected in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, there was concern about the risk to human health through consumption of contaminated seafood in the region. Federal and Gulf Coast State agencies worked together on a sampling plan and analytical protocols to determine whether seafood was safe to eat and acceptable for sale in the marketplace. Sensory and chemical methods were used to measure polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dispersant in >8,000 seafood specimens collected in federal waters of the Gulf. Overall, individual PAHs and the dispersant component dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate were found in low concentrations or below the limits of quantitation. When detected, the concentrations were at least two orders of magnitude lower than the level of concern for human health risk. Once an area closed to fishing was free of visibly floating oil and all sensory and chemical results for the seafood species within an area met the criteria for reopening, that area was eligible to be reopened. On April 19, 2011 the area around the wellhead was the last area in federal waters to be reopened nearly 1 y after the spill began. However, as of November 9, 2011, some state waters off the Louisiana coast (Barataria Bay and the Delta region) remain closed to fishing.


Subject(s)
Food Safety , Petroleum Pollution/adverse effects , Seafood/standards , Animals , Environmental Monitoring , Fisheries/standards , Humans , Louisiana , Petroleum/analysis , Petroleum/toxicity , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Seafood/analysis , Seafood/toxicity , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/standards , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
20.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 25(6): 1231-6, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21624455

ABSTRACT

Proposals for revising the principal United States law governing industrial chemicals, the Toxic Substances Control Act, have been under consideration in the US Congress for the past several years, and some version of such legislation may be passed in the near future. Concurrently, a desire to move away from current testing methods for ethical, scientific, and practical reasons has led to multi-million dollar investments in in vitro and computational toxicology methods and programs. Legislative language has the potential to endorse this transition and facilitate its fruition, or conversely enshrine in vivo testing methods for the foreseeable future. New legislation also has the potential to substantially increase the numbers of animals used in toxicity tests in the near term. However, there are a number of policies that, used effectively, can reduce the overall number of animals used in new toxicity tests. We present recent legislative proposals in the context of current testing programs and discuss their potential impacts on animal use, test method innovation, and achievement of desired legislative objectives. Discussions like these are essential to judiciously select policies that reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing and protect human health and the environment.


Subject(s)
Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Toxicology/legislation & jurisprudence , Animal Testing Alternatives/legislation & jurisprudence , Animal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Animals , Computational Biology/methods , Humans , Industry , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...