Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Legal Med ; 127(1): 127-30, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22015934

ABSTRACT

In forensic medicine, there is an undefined data background for the phenomenon of re-establishment of rigor mortis after mechanical loosening, a method used in establishing time since death in forensic casework that is thought to occur up to 8 h post-mortem. Nevertheless, the method is widely described in textbooks on forensic medicine. We examined 314 joints (elbow and knee) of 79 deceased at defined time points up to 21 h post-mortem (hpm). Data were analysed using a random intercept model. Here, we show that re-establishment occurred in 38.5% of joints at 7.5 to 19 hpm. Therefore, the maximum time span for the re-establishment of rigor mortis appears to be 2.5-fold longer than thought so far. These findings have major impact on the estimation of time since death in forensic casework.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint/pathology , Knee Joint/pathology , Postmortem Changes , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Forensic Pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
2.
BMJ ; 331(7512): 321-7, 2005 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16081444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease focuses on correcting the cholinergic deficiency in the central nervous system with cholinesterase inhibitors. Three cholinesterase inhibitors are currently recommended: donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine. This review assessed the scientific evidence for the recommendation of these agents. DATA SOURCES: The terms "donepezil", "rivastigmine", and "galantamine", limited by "randomized-controlled-trials" were searched in Medline (1989-November 2004), Embase (1989-November 2004), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews without restriction for language. STUDY SELECTION: All published, double blind, randomised controlled trials examining efficacy on the basis of clinical outcomes, in which treatment with donepezil, rivastigmine, or galantamine was compared with placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease, were included. Each study was assessed independently, following a predefined checklist of criteria of methodological quality. RESULTS: 22 trials met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up ranged from six weeks to three years. 12 of 14 studies measuring the cognitive outcome by means of the 70 point Alzheimer's disease assessment scale--cognitive subscale showed differences ranging from 1.5 points to 3.9 points in favour of the respective cholinesterase inhibitors. Benefits were also reported from all 12 trials that used the clinician's interview based impression of change scale with input from caregivers. Methodological assessment of all studies found considerable flaws--for example, multiple testing without correction for multiplicity or exclusion of patients after randomisation. CONCLUSION: Because of flawed methods and small clinical benefits, the scientific basis for recommendations of cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease is questionable.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Cholinesterase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Galantamine/therapeutic use , Indans/therapeutic use , Phenylcarbamates/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Donepezil , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Rivastigmine , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...