ABSTRACT
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) assessed the safety of Hydrogen Peroxide for use in cosmetics. This ingredient is reported to function in cosmetics as an antimicrobial agent, cosmetic biocide, oral health care agent, and oxidizing agent. The Panel reviewed the data relevant to the safety of this ingredient and concluded that Hydrogen Peroxide is safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics , Hydrogen Peroxide , Hydrogen Peroxide/toxicity , Cosmetics/toxicity , Cosmetics/chemistry , Humans , Animals , Risk Assessment , Toxicity Tests , Oxidants/toxicityABSTRACT
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed information that has become available since their original assessment from 2001, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Lard, Hydrogenated Lard, Lard Glyceride, Hydrogenated Lard Glyceride, Lard Glycerides, and Hydrogenated Lard Glycerides are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics , Toxicity Tests , Dietary Fats , Cosmetics/toxicity , GlyceridesABSTRACT
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed information that has become available since their year 2000 assessment, along with updated information regarding product types, and frequency and concentrations of use, and reaffirmed their original conclusion that Glyoxal is safe for use in products intended to be applied to the nail at concentrations ≤1.25% and that the available data are insufficient to support the safety for other uses.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics , Glyoxal , Glyoxal/toxicity , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicityABSTRACT
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 1998, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that sodium α-olefin sulfonates are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics , Cosmetics/toxicity , Alkenes , SodiumABSTRACT
This is a safety assessment of 6 Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics. The reported functions of the Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)-derived ingredients include abrasive, fragrance ingredient, and skin-conditioning agent (miscellaneous and occlusive). The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) reviewed the relevant data on these ingredients. Because final product formulations may contain multiple botanicals, each containing the same constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these constituents and to avoid reaching levels that may be hazardous to consumers. Industry should use good manufacturing practices to limit impurities. The Panel concluded that Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)-derived ingredients are safe in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment when formulated to be non-sensitizing.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics , Eucalyptus , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicity , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
This is a review of the scientific literature and unpublished data that are relevant for assessing the safety of 12 Helianthus annuus (sunflower)-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics. Because final product formulations may contain multiple botanicals, each containing similar constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these constituents and to avoid levels that may be hazardous to consumers. Helianthus annuus (sunflower)-derived ingredients may contain allergens, including 2S albumins and sesquiterpene lactones. Industry should use current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) to limit impurities and constituents of concern. The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) concluded that 9 Helianthus annuus (sunflower) seed- and flower-derived ingredients are safe as used in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment. The data are insufficient to evaluate the safety of 3 ingredients that are derived from other plant parts.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics , Helianthus , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicityABSTRACT
This is a safety assessment of glycerin as used in cosmetics. Glycerin functions as a denaturant, fragrance ingredient, hair conditioning agent, humectant, oral care agent, oral health-care drug, skin protectant, skin conditioning agent-humectant, and viscosity-decreasing agent. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed relevant animal and human data. The Panel concluded that glycerin is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in the practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Glycerol/toxicity , Animals , Glycerol/chemistry , Glycerol/isolation & purification , Humans , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Cosmetic ingredients derived from Camellia sinensis (tea) plant parts function as antioxidants and skin conditioning agents-humectant and miscellaneous. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed relevant animal and human data related to these ingredients. The use of the leaf ingredients in beverages results in much larger systemic exposures than those possible from cosmetic use. Accordingly, concern over the systemic toxicity potential of leaf-derived ingredients is mitigated. Because product formulations may contain multiple botanical ingredients, each containing the same constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these constituents and to avoid reaching levels that may lead to sensitization or other toxic effects. The Panel concluded that the C sinensis leaf-derived ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment when formulated to be nonsensitizing. However, the available data are insufficient to determine whether the non-leaf-derived ingredients are safe for use in cosmetics.
Subject(s)
Camellia sinensis/chemistry , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Animals , Humans , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
This is a safety assessment of Avena sativa (oat)-derived ingredients. The reported functions of these ingredients in cosmetics include abrasives, antioxidant, skin conditioning agents, absorbents, and bulking agents. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data related to these ingredients. Because final product formulations may contain multiple botanicals, each containing the same constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these constituents and to avoid reaching levels that may lead to sensitization or other toxic effects. The Panel stated that industry should continue to use good manufacturing practices to limit impurities and concluded that all but one of the Avena sativa (oat)-derived ingredients are safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment when formulated to be nonsensitizing; data are insufficient to come to a conclusion of safety for Avena Sativa (Oat) Meristem Cell Extract.
Subject(s)
Avena/chemistry , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Animals , Humans , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediolas used in cosmetics. All 3 ingredients are reported to function in cosmetics as pH adjusters, and tromethamine and aminomethyl propanediol are also reported to function as fragrance ingredients. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data related to these ingredients, along with a previous safety assessment of aminomethyl propanediol. The Panel concluded that tromethamine, aminomethyl propanediol, and aminoethyl propanediol are safe in cosmetics in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Cosmetics/chemistry , Propylene Glycols/adverse effects , Tromethamine/adverse effects , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Consumer Product Safety , Humans , Molecular Structure , Propylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Propylene Glycols/chemistry , Propylene Glycols/pharmacokinetics , Rats , Tromethamine/administration & dosage , Tromethamine/chemistry , Tromethamine/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) assessed the safety of 39 polyether lanolin ingredients as used in cosmetics. These ingredients function mostly as hair conditioning agents, skin conditioning agent-emollients, and surfactant-emulsifying agents. The Panel reviewed available animal and clinical data, from previous CIR safety assessments of related ingredients and components. The similar structure, properties, functions, and uses of these ingredients enabled grouping them and using the available toxicological data to assess the safety of the entire group. The Panel concluded that these polyether lanolin ingredients are safe in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Cosmetics/adverse effects , Lanolin/analogs & derivatives , Lanolin/adverse effects , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/chemistry , Humans , Lanolin/chemistryABSTRACT
This is a safety assessment of alumina and aluminum hydroxide as used in cosmetics. Alumina functions as an abrasive, absorbent, anticaking agent, bulking agent, and opacifying agent. Aluminum hydroxide functions as a buffering agent, corrosion inhibitor, and pH adjuster. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluated the safe use of alumina in several medical devices and aluminum hydroxide in over-the-counter drugs, which included a review of human and animal safety data. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel considered the FDA evaluations as part of the basis for determining the safety of these ingredients as used in cosmetics. Alumina used in cosmetics is essentially the same as that used in medical devices. This safety assessment does not include metallic or elemental aluminum as a cosmetic ingredient. The CIR Expert Panel concluded that alumina and aluminum hydroxide are safe in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Aluminum Hydroxide/toxicity , Aluminum Oxide/toxicity , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/standards , Aluminum Hydroxide/analysis , Aluminum Hydroxide/pharmacokinetics , Aluminum Oxide/analysis , Aluminum Oxide/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Consumer Product Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Cosmetics/chemistry , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Government Regulation , Humans , Molecular Structure , Toxicity Tests/methods , Toxicokinetics , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
Cosmetic ingredients derived from Achillea millefolium function in cosmetics as skin-conditioning agents-miscellaneous, skin-conditioning agents-humectants, and fragrance ingredients. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed relevant animal and human data to determine their safety in cosmetics and raised concerns about cosmetics containing linalool, thujone, quercetin, hydroquinone, or α-peroxyachifolid. Because final product formulations may contain multiple botanicals, each containing similar constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these components and to avoid reaching levels that may be hazardous to consumers. Additionally, industry was advised to use good manufacturing practices to limit impurities. The Panel concluded that achillea millefolium extract, achillea millefolium flower extract, and achillea millefolium flower/leaf/stem extract are safe in the present practices of use and concentration in cosmetics when formulated to be nonsensitizing.
Subject(s)
Achillea/chemistry , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/standards , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Plant Oils/toxicity , Animals , Consumer Product Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Cosmetics/chemistry , Humans , Plant Extracts/analysis , Plant Extracts/pharmacokinetics , Plant Oils/analysis , Plant Oils/pharmacokinetics , Toxicity Tests/methods , Toxicokinetics , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (CIR Panel) reviewed the safety of hydroxypropyl bis(N-Hydroxyethyl-p-Phenylenediamine) HCl, which functions as an oxidative hair dye ingredient. The Panel considered relevant animal and human data provided in this safety assessment and concluded that hydroxypropyl bis(N-hydroxyethyl-p-phenylenediamine) HCl is safe for use in oxidative hair dye formulations as described in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Hair Dyes/toxicity , Phenylenediamines/toxicity , Propanolamines/toxicity , Animals , Hair Dyes/metabolism , Humans , Irritants/toxicity , Mutagenicity Tests , Toxicity Tests, AcuteABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of 13 Panax spp root-derived ingredients as used in cosmetics. Panax "spp" indicates that multiple species within the genus are used in cosmetics, but not all species within that genus. Four species are being considered in this safety assessment. These ingredients function mostly as skin-conditioning agents-miscellaneous, fragrance ingredients, skin-conditioning agents-humectant, skin-conditioning agents-emollient, and cosmetic astringents. The Panel reviewed available data related to these ingredients and addressed the issue of pulegone, a constituent of these ingredients and other ingredients, such as peppermint oil. The Panel concluded that these Panax spp root-derived ingredients are safe in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicity , Panax/chemistry , Plant Extracts/toxicity , Plant Roots/chemistry , Animals , Cosmetics/chemistry , Cosmetics/pharmacokinetics , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Emollients/chemistry , Emollients/pharmacokinetics , Emollients/toxicity , Humans , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacokinetics , Risk Assessment , Skin/drug effects , Skin/metabolism , Toxicity TestsABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (the Panel) reviewed the safety of synthetic fluorphlogopite as used in cosmetics. Synthetic fluorphlogopite functions as a bulking agent and a viscosity-increasing agent. The Panel reviewed available animal and human data related to this ingredient along with a previous safety assessment of other magnesium silicates. The Panel concluded that synthetic fluorphlogopite was safe as cosmetic ingredients in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.
Subject(s)
Aluminum Silicates/toxicity , Consumer Product Safety , Cosmetics/toxicity , Aluminum Silicates/chemistry , Aluminum Silicates/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Cosmetics/chemistry , Cosmetics/pharmacokinetics , DNA Damage/drug effects , Databases, Factual , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Magnesium Silicates/chemistry , Magnesium Silicates/toxicity , Risk Assessment , Skin/drug effects , Skin/metabolism , Toxicity TestsABSTRACT
The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of 16 pentaerythrityl tetraester compounds as used in cosmetics. These ingredients mostly function as hair-conditioning agents, skin-conditioning agents-miscellaneous and binders, skin-conditioning agents-occlusive, viscosity-increasing agents-nonaqueous, and skin-conditioning agents-emollient. The Panel reviewed the available animal and human data related to these ingredients and previous safety assessments of the fatty acid moieties. The Panel concluded that pentaerythrityl tetraisostearate and the other pentaerythrityl tetraester compounds were safe in the practices of use and concentration as given in this safety assessment.
