A Prospective Trial of Single-Fraction Radiation to the Tumor Bed with a Novel Breast-Specific Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Device: The GammaPod.

Purpose: Radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer is typically delivered in a hypofractionated regimen to the whole breast followed by a tumor bed boost. This results in a treatment course of approximately 4 weeks. In this study, the tumor bed boost was delivered in a single fraction as part of a safety and feasibility study for FDA clearance of the device. Methods and Materials: Eligible women with early-stage breast cancer underwent lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy. Patients underwent breast immobilization using a system specific to the GammaPod followed by CT simulation, boost treatment planning, and boost treatment delivery all in a single treatment day. Patients then started whole-breast radiation therapy within 1 week of the boost treatment. Patients and treatments were assessed for safety and feasibility. Acute toxicities were recorded. Results: A single-fraction boost of 8 Gy was delivered to the tumor bed before a course of whole-breast radiation. The GammaPod treatment was successfully delivered to 14 of 17 enrolled patients. Acute toxicities from all radiation therapy, inclusive of the boost and whole-breast radiation, were limited to grade 1 events. Conclusions: The GammaPod device successfully delivered a single-fraction boost treatment to the tumor bed with no change in expected acute toxicities. The results of this study led to FDA clearance of the device through the Investigational Device Exemption process at the FDA. The GammaPod is in clinical use at 4e institutions nationally and internationally, with additional sites pending in 2023.

How many brain metastases can be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery before the radiation dose delivered to normal brain tissue rivals that associated with standard whole brain radiotherapy?

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trial data comparing outcomes after administration of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to patients with brain metastases (BM) suggest that SRS better preserves cognitive function and quality of life without negatively impacting overall survival. Here, we estimate the maximum number of BM that can be treated using single and multi-session SRS while limiting the dose of radiation delivered to normal brain tissue to that associated with WBRT. METHODS: Multiple-tumor SRS was simulated using a Monte Carlo - type approach and a pre-calculated dose kernel method. Tumors with diameters ≤36 mm were randomly placed throughout the contoured brain parenchyma until the brain mean dose reached 3 Gy, equivalent to the radiation dose delivered during a single fraction of a standard course of WBRT (a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 3 Gy). Distribution of tumor sizes, dose coverage, selectivity, normalization, and maximum dose data used in the simulations were based on institutional clinical metastases data. RESULTS: The mean number of tumors treated, mean volume of healthy brain tissue receiving > 12 Gy (V12) per tumor, and total tumor volume treated using mixed tumor size distributions were 12.7 ± 4.2, 2.2 cc, and 12.9 cc, respectively. Thus, we estimate that treating 12-13 tumors per day over 10 days would deliver the dose of radiation to healthy brain tissue typically associated with a standard course of WBRT. CONCLUSION: Although in clinical practice, treatment with SRS is often limited to patients with ≤15 BM, our findings suggest that many more lesions could be targeted while still minimizing the negative impacts on quality of life and neurocognition often associated with WBRT. Results from this in silico analysis require clinical validation.

Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation.

PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a novel device for stereotactic breast treatments that employs 25 rotating Co-60 sources while the patient is continuously translated in three axes to deliver a highly conformal dose to the target. There is no commercial software available for independent second calculations. The purpose of this study is to determine an efficient way to estimate GammaPod treatment times based on target volume and use it as a second calculation for patient-specific quality assurance. METHODS: Fifty-nine GammaPod (Xcision Medical Systems, LLC.) breast cancer patient treatments were used as the fitting dataset for this study. Similar to the Curie-seconds concept in brachytherapy, we considered dose-rate × time/(prescribed dose) as a function of target volumes. Using a MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) script, we generated linear (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) and quadratic fits and tested the resulting equations on an additional set of 30 patients. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the dose-rate × time/(prescribed dose) and patients' target volumes for both the linear and quadratic models. The linear fit was selected for use and using the polyval function in MATLAB, a 95% CI graph was created to depict the accuracy of the prediction for treatment times. Testing the model on 30 additional patients with target volumes ranging from 20 to 188 cc yielded treatment times from 10 to 25 min that in all cases were within the predicted CI. The average absolute difference between the predicted and actual treatment times was 1.0 min (range 0-3.3 min). The average percent difference was 5.8% (range 0%-18.4%). CONCLUSION: This work has resulted in a viable independent calculation for GammaPod treatment times. This method has been implemented as a spreadsheet that is ready for clinical use to predict and verify the accuracy of breast cancer treatment times.

Radiation shielding and safety implications following linac conversion to an electron FLASH-RT unit.

PURPOSE: Due to their finite range, electrons are typically ignored when calculating shielding requirements in megavoltage energy linear accelerator vaults. However, the assumption that 16 MeV electrons need not be considered does not hold when operated at FLASH-RT dose rates (~200× clinical dose rate), where dose rate from bremsstrahlung photons is an order of magnitude higher than that from an 18 MV beam for which shielding was designed. We investigate the shielding and radiation protection impact of converting a Varian 21EX linac to FLASH-RT dose rates. METHODS: We performed a radiation survey in all occupied areas using a Fluke Biomedical Inovision 451P survey meter and a Wide Energy Neutron Detection Instrument (Wendi)-2 FHT 762 neutron detector. The dose rate from activated linac components following a 1.8-min FLASH-RT delivery was also measured. RESULTS: When operated at a gantry angle of 180° such as during biology experiments, the 16 MeV FLASH-RT electrons deliver ~10 µSv/h in the controlled areas and 780 µSv/h in the uncontrolled areas, which is above the 20 µSv in any 1-h USNRC limit. However, to exceed 20 µSv, the unit must be operated continuously for 92 s, which corresponds in this bunker and FLASH-RT beam to a 3180 Gy workload at isocenter, which would be unfeasible to deliver within that timeframe due to experimental logistics. While beam steering and dosimetry activities can require workloads of that magnitude, during these activities, the gantry is positioned at 0° and the dose rate in the uncontrolled area becomes undetectable. Likewise, neutron activation of linac components can reach 25 µSv/h near the isocenter following FLASH-RT delivery, but dissipates within minutes, and total doses within an hour are below 20 µSv. CONCLUSION: Bremsstrahlung photons created by a 16 MeV FLASH-RT electron beam resulted in consequential dose rates in controlled and uncontrolled areas, and from activated linac components in the vault. While our linac vault shielding proved sufficient, other investigators would be prudent to confirm the adequacy of their radiation safety program, particularly if operating in vaults designed for 6 MV.

Simplified method for determining dose to a non-water phantom through the use of ND,w and IAEA TRS 483 for the GammaPod.

PURPOSE: GammaPod, a breast stereotactic radiosurgery device, utilizes 25 rotating Co-60 sources to deliver highly conformal dose distributions. The GammaPod system requires that reference dosimetry be performed in a specific vendor-supplied poly-methylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom. The nonstandard nature of GammaPod dosimetry, in both the phantom material and machine-specific reference (msr), prohibits use of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 51 (TG-51) protocol. This study proposes a practical method using TRS 483 to make the reference dosimetry procedure simpler and to reduce overall uncertainties. METHODS: The dose to PMMA (DPMMA) is determined under msr conditions using TRS 483 with an Exradin A1SL chamber placed in a PMMA phantom. The conversion factor, which converts from the dose-to-water (Dw) in broad-beam Co-60 reference geometry to DPMMA in the msr small field Co-60 (Qmsr) geometry, is derived using the Monte Carlo simulations and procedure described in TRS 483. RESULTS: The new conversion factor value for an Exradin A1SL chamber is 0.974. When combined with ND,w, DPMMA differs by 0.5% from the TG-21/Nx method and 0.2% from the IROC values. Uncertainty decreased from 2.2% to 1.6%. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented TRS 483 reference dosimetry protocols utilizing ND,w for the GammaPod in the PMMA phantom. These results show not only agreement between measurements performed with the previously published method and independent thermoluminescent dosimetry measurements but also reductions in uncertainty. This also provides readers with a pathway to develop their own IAEA TRS 483 factor for any new small field machine that may be developed.

Reproducibility of a novel, vacuum-assisted immobilization for breast stereotactic radiotherapy.

A novel, breast-specific stereotactic radiotherapy device has been developed for delivery of highly conformal, accelerated partial breast irradiation. This device employs a unique, vacuum-assisted, breast cup immobilization system that applies a gentle, negative pressure to the target breast with the patient in the prone position. A device-specific patient loader is utilized for simulation scanning and device docking. Prior to clinical activation, a prospective protocol enrolled 25 patients who had been or were to be treated with breast conservation surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for localized breast cancer. The patients underwent breast cup placement and two separate CT simulation scans. Surgical clips within the breast were mapped and positions measured against the device's integrated stereotactic fiducial/coordinate system to confirm reproducible and durable immobilization during the simulation, treatment planning, and delivery process for the device. Of the enrolled 25 patients, 16 were deemed eligible for analysis. Seventy-three clips (median, 4; mean, 4.6; range, 1-8 per patient) were mapped in these selected patients on both the first and second CT scans. X, Y, and Z coordinates were determined for the center point of each clip. Length of vector change in position was determined for each clip between the two scans. The mean displacement of implanted clips was 1.90 mm (median, 1.47 mm; range, 0.44-6.52 mm) (95% CI, 1.6-2.20 mm). Additional analyses stratified clips by position within the breast and depth into the immobilization cup. Overall, this effort validated the clinically utilized 3-mm planning target volume margin for accurate, reliable, and precise employment of the device.

A multi-center analysis of single-fraction versus hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated-SRS (HF-SRS) may allow for improved local control and a reduced risk of radiation necrosis compared to single-fraction-SRS (SF-SRS). However, data comparing these two treatment approaches are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between SF-SRS versus HF-SRS across our multi-center academic network. METHODS: Patients treated with SF-SRS or HF-SRS for brain metastasis from 2013 to 2018 across 5 radiation oncology centers were retrospectively reviewed. SF-SRS dosing was standardized, whereas HF-SRS dosing regimens were variable. The co-primary endpoints of local control and radiation necrosis were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to evaluate the impact of select independent variables on the outcomes of interest. Propensity score adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables. To assess dose response for HF-SRS, Biologic Effective Dose (BED) assuming an α/ß of 10 (BED10) was used as a surrogate for total dose. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty six patients with 335 brain metastasis treated with SF-SRS (n = 222 lesions) or HF-SRS (n = 113 lesions) were included. Prior whole brain radiation was given in 33% (n = 74) and 34% (n = 38) of lesions treated with SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively (p = 0.30). After a median follow up time of 12 months in each cohort, the adjusted 1-year rate of local control and incidence of radiation necrosis was 91% (95% CI 86-96%) and 85% (95% CI 75-95%) (p = 0.26) and 10% (95% CI 5-15%) and 7% (95% CI 0.1-14%) (p = 0.73) for SF-SRS and HF-SRS, respectively. For lesions > 2 cm, the adjusted 1 year local control was 97% (95% CI 84-100%) for SF-SRS and 64% (95% CI 43-85%) for HF-SRS (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, SRS fractionation was not associated with local control and only size ≤2 cm was associated with a decreased risk of developing radiation necrosis (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.58, p < 0.01). For HF-SRS, 1 year local control was 100% for lesions treated with a BED10 ≥ 50 compared to 77% (95% CI 65-88%) for lesions that received a BED10 < 50 (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison study of dose fractionation for the treatment of brain metastases, there was no difference in local control or radiation necrosis between HF-SRS and SF-SRS. For HF-SRS, a BED10 ≥ 50 may improve local control.

Dosimetry evaluation of the GammaPod stereotactic radiosurgery device based on established AAPM and IAEA protocols.

PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a novel dedicated prone breast stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) device recently developed at the University of Maryland Medical Center. This device utilizes multiple rotating Co-60 sources to create highly conformal dose distributions for breast treatments, including boosts, partial breast irradiation, or presurgery SRS. However, due to its small field sizes and nonstandard geometry, existing calibration protocols cannot be directly applied. In this study, we adapt and implement the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 21 (TG-21) and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series 483 (TRS 483) protocols for reference dose measurements for the GammaPod. This represents the first published dosimetric investigation GammaPod and is meant to serve as a reference to future users commissioning and calibrating these devices. METHODS: Reference dose measurements were performed following the TG-21/IAEA TRS 483 protocols using an ADCL-calibrated Exradin A1SL thimble chamber in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) breast-mimicking phantom. Monte Carlo calculations and measurements were also performed in water to determine chamber-specific k PMMA Q m s r , Q 0 f msr , f ref quality conversion factor converting reference field size (fref ) to machine-specific field sizes (fmsr ) (25-mm) as well as k PMMA f clin , f msr , the conversion factor from the (fmsr ) to the clinical field size (fclin ) (15mm). Verification was performed using the thermoluminescent dosimeter remote monitoring service from the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) in Houston, TX. RESULTS: The (fref ) to (fmsr ) chamber-specific factor k PMMA Q m s r , Q 0 f msr , f ref was 0.992 while the (fmsr ) to (fclin ) chamber-specific k PMMA f clin , f msr factor was 1.014. The radiation absorbed dose to water measured in the PMMA phantom based on the TG-21/IAEA TRS 483 formalism agreed with IROC values to within 1% and 2% for the 25- and 15-mm collimators, respectively. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented the TG-21 and TRS 483 reference dosimetry protocols for the GammaPod. These results show agreement between measurements performed with different reference dosimetry protocols and independent thermoluminescent measurements.

Development and validation of a comprehensive patient-specific quality assurance program for a novel stereotactic radiation delivery system for breast lesions.

PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a dedicated prone breast stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) machine composed of 25 cobalt-60 sources which rotate around the breast to create highly conformal dose distributions for boosts, partial-breast irradiation, or neo-adjuvant SRS. We describe the development and validation of a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) system for the GammaPod. METHODS: We present two PSQA methods: measurement based and calculation based PSQA. The measurements are performed with a combination of absolute and relative dose measurements. Absolute dosimetry is performed in a single point using a 0.053-cc pinpoint ionization chamber in the center of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) breast phantom and a water-filled breast cup. Relative dose distributions are verified with EBT3 film in the PMMA phantom. The calculation-based method verifies point doses with a novel semi-empirical independent-calculation software. RESULTS: The average (± standard deviation) breast and target sizes were 1263 ± 335.3 cc and 66.9 ± 29.9 cc, respectively. All ion chamber measurements performed in water and the PMMA phantom agreed with the treatment planning system (TPS) within 2.7%, with average (max) difference of -1.3% (-1.9%) and -1.3% (-2.7%), respectively. Relative dose distributions measured by film showed an average gamma pass rate of 97.0 ± 3.2 when using a 3%/1 mm criteria. The lowest gamma analysis pass rate was 90.0%. The independent calculation software had average agreements (max) with the patient and QA plan calculation of 0.2% (2.2%) and -0.1% (2.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented the first GammaPod PSQA program. These results show that the GammaPod can be used to calculate and deliver the predicted dose precisely and accurately. For routine PSQA performed prior to treatments, the independent calculation is recommended as it verifies the accuracy of the planned dose without increasing the risk of losing vacuum due to prolonged waiting times.

Dosimetric effects of the kV based image-guided radiation therapy of prone breast external beam radiation: Towards the optimized imaging frequency.

PURPOSE: For prone breast treatment, daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) allows couch shifting to correct breast position relative to the treatment field. This work investigates the dosimetric effect of reducing kV imaging frequencies and the feasibility of optimizing the frequency using patient anatomy or their first 3-day shifts. METHOD: Thirty-seven prone breast patients who had been treated with skin marker alignment followed by daily kV were retrospectively analyzed. Three IGRT schemes (daily-kV, weekly-kV, no-kV) were simulated, assuming that fractions with kV imaging deliver a dose distribution equivalent to that in computed tomography (CT) planning, whereas other fractions yield a dose distribution as recreated by shifting the CT plan isocenter back to its position before the couch shift was applied. Treatment dose to targets (breast and lumpectomy cavity [LPC]) and organs at risks (OAR)s (heart, ipsilateral lung) in different schemes were calculated. Patient anatomy information on CT plans and first 3-day couch shift data were analyzed to investigate whether these factors could guide imaging scheme optimization. RESULTS: When kV imaging frequency was reduced, the percentage dose changes (δD) for breast and LPC objectives (average <1%) were smaller than those for heart and lung (average 28%-31% for Dmean ). In general, the δD of no-kV imaging was approximately that of weekly kV imaging × a factor of 1.2-1.4. Although most dose objectives were not affected, the potential higher heart dose may be of concern. No strong correlation was found between δD for different kV frequencies and patient anatomy size/distance or the first 3-day couch shift data. CONCLUSIONS: Despite resulting in lower imaging dose, time, cost, and similar target coverage, a reduction in kV imaging frequency may introduce higher heart complication risk. Daily kVs are needed more in left-sided breast patients. A less frequent imaging schedule, if considered, cannot be individually optimized using CT anatomic features or early shift data.

Collision indicator charts for gantry-couch position combinations for Siemens ONCOR and Elekta Infinity linacs.

Noncoplanar radiation fields from a linear accelerator can be used to deliver radiation dose distributions that are superior to those delivered using coplanar radiation fields. Noncoplanar radiation field arrangements are especially valuable when delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Noncoplanar radiation fields, however, are geometrically more challenging to deliver than coplanar radiation fields, and are associated with a greater risk of collisions between the gantry, treatment couch, and patient. Knowledge of which treatment couch offset, treatment couch angle, and gantry angle combinations provide a collision-free radiotherapy delivery is useful in the treatment planning process, as the risk of requiring replanning due to improperly selected treatment parameters can be minimized. Such tables are by default specific to the linear accelerator make and model used for treatment. In this work a set of plots is presented indicating which combination of treatment couch lateral offsets (-10 cm to 10 cm), couch angles (270° to 90°), and gantry angles (0° to 360°), will result in collision-free radiation delivery using Siemens ONCOR linear accelerators equipped with a 160-leaf multileaf collimator and a 550 TxT treatment table, and a Elekta Infinity linear accelerator with an MLCi2 and Elekta iBEAM evo Couchtop EP. The patient was assumed to have a width of 50 cm and a height of 25 cm.

Breast radiotherapy in the prone position primarily reduces the maximum out-of-field measured dose to the ipsilateral lung.

PURPOSE: To quantify the potential advantages of prone position breast radiotherapy in terms of the radiation exposure to out-of-field organs, particularly, the breast or the lung. Several dosimetric studies have been reported, based on commercial treatment planning software (TPS). These TPS approaches are not, however, adequate for characterizing out-of-field doses. In this work, relevant out-of-field organ doses have been directly measured. METHODS: The authors utilized an adult anthropomorphic phantom to conduct measurements of out-of-field doses in prone and supine position, using 50 Gy prescription dose intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D-CRT plans. Measurements were made using multiple MOSFET dosimeters in various locations in the ipsilateral lung, the contralateral lung and in the contralateral breast. RESULTS: The closer the organ (or organ segment) was to the treatment volume, the more dose sparing was seen for prone vs supine positioning. Breast radiotherapy in the prone position results in a marked reduction in the dose to the proximal part of the ipsilateral lung, compared with treatment in the conventional supine position. This is true both for 3D-CRT and for IMRT. For IMRT, the maximum measured dose to the lung was reduced from 4 to 1.6 Gy, while for 3D-CRT, the maximum measured lung dose was reduced from 5 to 1.7 Gy. For the proximal part of the ipsilateral lung, as well as for the contralateral lung and the contralateral breast, there is little difference in the measured organ doses whether the treatment is given in the prone or the supine-position. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in the maximum dose to the proximal part of the ipsilateral lung produced by prone position radiotherapy is of potentially considerable significance. The dose-response relation for radiation-induced lung cancer increases monotonically in the zero to 5-Gy dose range, implying that a major decrease in the maximum lung dose may result in a significant decrease in the radiation-induced lung cancer risk.

Prone hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy without a boost to the tumor bed: comparable toxicity of IMRT versus a 3D conformal technique.

PURPOSE: We report a comparison of the dosimetry and toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) among patients treated in the prone position with the same fractionation and target of the hypofractionation arm of the Canadian/Whelan trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An institutional review board-approved protocol identified a consecutive series of early-stage breast cancer patients treated according to the Canadian hypofractionation regimen but in the prone position. Patients underwent IMRT treatment planning and treatment if the insurance carrier approved reimbursement for IMRT; in case of refusal, a 3D-CRT plan was used. A comparison of the dosimetric and toxicity outcomes during the acute, subacute, and long-term follow-up of the two treatment groups is reported. RESULTS: We included 97 consecutive patients with 100 treatment plans in this study (3 patients with bilateral breast cancer); 40 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and 57 with IMRT. IMRT significantly reduced the maximum dose (Dmax median, 109.96% for 3D-CRT vs. 107.28% for IMRT; p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon test) and improved median dose homogeneity (median, 1.15 for 3D-CRT vs. 1.05 for IMRT; p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon test) when compared with 3D-CRT. Acute toxicity consisted primarily of Grade 1 to 2 dermatitis and occurred in 92% of patients. Grade 2 dermatitis occurred in 13% of patients in the 3D-CRT group and 2% in the IMRT group. IMRT moderately decreased rates of acute pruritus (p = 0.03, chi-square test) and Grade 2 to 3 subacute hyperpigmentation (p = 0.01, Fisher exact test). With a minimum of 6 months' follow-up, the treatment was similarly well tolerated in either group, including among women with large breast volumes. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy is well tolerated when treating patients in the prone position, even among those with large breast volumes. Breast IMRT significantly improves dosimetry but yields only a modest but confirmed benefit in terms of toxicities. If a concurrent boost to the tumor bed is not required, a conformal 3D-CRT approach can adequately deliver prone whole-breast hypofractionation radiotherapy.

Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To report setup variations during prone accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS: New York University (NYU) 07-582 is an institutional review board-approved protocol of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to deliver image-guided ABPI in the prone position. Eligible are postmenopausal women with pT1 breast cancer excised with negative margins and no nodal involvement. A total dose of 30 Gy in five daily fractions of 6 Gy are delivered to the planning target volume (the tumor cavity with 1.5-cm margin) by image-guided radiotherapy. Patients are set up prone, on a dedicated mattress, used for both simulation and treatment. After positioning with skin marks and lasers, CBCTs are performed and the images are registered to the planning CT. The resulting shifts (setup corrections) are recorded in the three principal directions and applied. Portal images are taken for verification. If they differ from the planning digital reconstructed radiographs, the patient is reset, and a new CBCT is taken. RESULTS: 70 consecutive patients have undergone a total of 343 CBCTs: 7 patients had four of five planned CBCTs performed. Seven CBCTs (2%) required to be repeated because of misalignment in the comparison between portal and digital reconstructed radiograph image after the first CBCT. The mean shifts and standard deviations in the anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and medial-lateral (ML) directions were -0.19 (0.54), -0.02 (0.33), and -0.02 (0.43) cm, respectively. The average root mean squares of the daily shifts were 0.50 (0.28), 0.29 (0.17), and 0.38 (0.20). A conservative margin formula resulted in a recommended margin of 1.26, 0.73, 0.96 cm in the AP, SI, and ML directions. CONCLUSION: CBCTs confirmed that the NYU prone APBI setup and treatment technique are reproducible, with interfraction variation comparable to those reported for supine setup. The currently applied margin (1.5 cm) adequately compensates for the setup variation detected.

Characterization of the transmission of the Elekta Stereotactic Body Frame (ESBF) and accounting for it during treatment planning.

The purpose of this study was to measure the transmission of the Elekta Stereotactic Body Frame (ESBF) and treatment table, to calculate the transmission of the frame in the Eclipse Treatment Planning System (TPS) using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA), and to demonstrate a simple method of accounting for this transmission in treatment planning. A solid water body phantom was imaged inside the ESBF and planned with multiple 3D-CRT fields using AAA using both 6-MV and 16-MV energies. In the first set of plans, the frame and table were included in the "Body" contour and, therefore, used in the dose calculations. In the second set of plans, the frame and the table were not included in the "Body" contour and, therefore, were not incorporated in the calculations. The latter simulated a setup in which there was no frame or table. Eclipse TPS will only incorporate data from the CT set in calculations, if it is included in the "Body" contour. The plans were treated under two conditions: one with the phantom in the ESBF and one without the frame on a specially designed table. This table allows all the beams to enter the phantom without passing through any attenuating material (i.e., table or frame). Transmission of the frame and table was determined by the ratio of the measurements with the frame and table to the measurements without them. To validate the accuracy of the calculation model, plans with homogeneous phantom and a heterogeneous plan were compared with the measurements. The transmission of the frame varies from 89-94% depending on the angle of the beams and whether they also intercept the table. The AAA algorithm calculated the transmission of the frame and table to within 2% of the measurements for all gantry angles. Validation results showed that AAA can calculate the dose to the target to within 2% of the measured value. The attenuation caused by the ESBF must be accounted for in the planning process. For Eclipse, the frame should be contoured and included in all calculations. This can be done easily and accurately.

Increased skin dose with the use of a custom mattress for prone breast radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the loss of buildup to the skin of the breast in the prone position due to 2 different positioning systems during tangential external beam irradiation. Two experiments were performed; one with a standard nylon-covered foam support and another with a novel helium-filled Mylar bag support. The choice of helium-filled Mylar was to reduce the contamination to as low as possible. The experiments were designed to allow a surface dose measurement and a depth dose profile with the pads placed in the path of the beam in front of the detector. All measurements were taken using a Capintec PS-033 thin-window parallel plate ionization chamber. The standard nylon-covered foam pad caused the surface dose to rise as it got closer to the skin. When the pad was directly touching the surface, the surface dose increased by 300% compared to the result when no pad was present. This loss of buildup to the surface was similar to that of a custom bolus material. The opposite effect occurred with the use of the helium-filled Mylar bag, namely the surface dose gradually decreased as the pad got closer to the phantom. When the Mylar pad was directly touching the phantom, the surface dose was decreased by 7% compared to when no pad was present. The use of a foam pad could potentially result in a significant higher dose to the skin, resulting in an enhanced acute skin reaction. Therefore, special care should be taken in this clinical scenario and further investigation of an air- or helium-based mylar support pad should be investigated in the context of definitive breast radiation treatment.

A dosimetric comparison of accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques: multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and supine versus prone helical tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare dosimetrically four different techniques of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in the same patient. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen post-lumpectomy interstitial brachytherapy (IB) patients underwent imaging with preimplant computed tomography (CT) in the prone and supine position. These CT scans were then used to generate three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and prone and supine helical tomotherapy (PT and ST, respectively) APBI plans and compared with the treated IB plans. Dose-volume histogram analysis and the mean dose (NTD(mean)) values were compared. RESULTS: Planning target volume coverage was excellent for all methods. Statistical significance was considered to be a p value <0.05. The mean V100 was significantly lower for IB (12% vs. 15% for PT, 18% for ST, and 26% for 3D-CRT). A greater significant differential was seen when comparing V50 with mean values of 24%, 43%, 47%, and 52% for IB, PT, ST, and 3D-CRT, respectively. The IB and PT were similar and delivered an average lung NTD(mean) dose of 1.3 Gy(3) and 1.2 Gy(3), respectively. Both of these methods were statistically significantly lower than the supine external beam techniques. Overall, all four methods yielded similar low doses to the heart. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IB and PT resulted in greater normal tissue sparing (especially ipsilateral breast and lung) than the use of supine external beam techniques of 3D-CRT or ST. However, the choice of APBI technique must be tailored to the patient's anatomy, lumpectomy cavity location, and overall treatment goals.