ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Among the main causes of blindness and severe vision loss are age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion. The «Do Not Do¼ recommendations are strategies to improve quality of care and optimise healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to establish, by consensus, practices of low value in the above-mentioned pathologies, in addition to estimating their occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed methods study including a first phase of consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the Nominal Group technique. In the second phase, a retrospective observational study was conducted, by conducting a review of medical records. RESULTS: A total of 7 recommendations were established for age-related macular degeneration, 4 for diabetic macular oedema, and 5 for retinal vein occlusion. A total of 1,012 medical records were reviewed by the 4 participating hospitals. The review of medical records revealed that agreed «Do Not Do's¼ occurred in a range between 0.6% and 31.4% of the cases included in the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified «Do Not Do¼ recommendations in these pathologies that occur relatively often in clinical practice. It is necessary to review the healthcare processes that will enable these practices to be eradicated, and the quality of care to be improved.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Degeneration , Macular Edema , Retinal Vein Occlusion , Consensus , Humans , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Antecedentes y objetivos Entre las principales causas de ceguera y de pérdida severa de la visión se encuentran la degeneración macular asociada a la edad, el edema macular diabético y la oclusión venosa de la retina. Las recomendaciones «no hacer» son estrategias para mejorar la calidad asistencial y optimizar los costes sanitarios. Este estudio tuvo por objetivo definir por consenso prácticas de escaso valor en las enfermedades mencionadas, además de estimar su ocurrencia. Materiales y métodos Estudio de métodos mixtos. En una primera fase se buscó el consenso de un panel multidisciplinar de expertos a través de la técnica del grupo nominal. En una segunda fase, se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo, mediante el cual se revisaron los registros de historias clínicas. Resultados Fueron establecidas 7 recomendaciones para degeneración macular asociada a la edad, 4 para edema macular diabético y 5 para oclusión venosa de la retina. En total, 1.012 registros de pacientes fueron revisados por los 4 hospitales participantes. La revisión de historias clínicas reveló que los «no hacer» consensuados ocurrían en un rango entre 0,6 y 31,4% de los casos incluidos en el estudio. Conclusión Este estudio identificó recomendaciones «no hacer» en estas enfermedades que ocurren con relativa frecuencia en la práctica clínica. Es necesario revisar el proceso asistencial para erradicar estas prácticas y mejorar la calidad asistencial (AU)
Background and objective Among the main causes of blindness and severe vision loss are age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion. The «Do Not Do» recommendations are strategies to improve quality of care and optimise healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to establish, by consensus, practices of low value in the above-mentioned pathologies, in addition to estimating their occurrence. Materials and methods Mixed methods study including a first phase of consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the Nominal Group technique. In the second phase, a retrospective observational study was conducted, by conducting a review of medical records. Results A total of 7 recommendations were established for age-related macular degeneration, 4 for diabetic macular oedema, and 5 for retinal vein occlusion. A total of 1,012 medical records were reviewed by the 4 participating hospitals. The review of medical records revealed that agreed «Do Not Do's» occurred in a range between 0.6% and 31.4% of the cases included in the study. Conclusions This study identified «Do Not Do» recommendations in these pathologies that occur relatively often in clinical practice. It is necessary to review the healthcare processes that will enable these practices to be eradicated, and the quality of care to be improved (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/therapy , Macular Degeneration/therapy , Macular Edema/therapy , Retinal Vein Occlusion/therapy , Retrospective Studies , ConsensusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Among the main causes of blindness and severe vision loss are age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion. The «Do Not Do¼ recommendations are strategies to improve quality of care and optimise healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to establish, by consensus, practices of low value in the above-mentioned pathologies, in addition to estimating their occurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed methods study including a first phase of consensus of a multidisciplinary panel of experts using the Nominal Group technique. In the second phase, a retrospective observational study was conducted, by conducting a review of medical records. RESULTS: A total of 7 recommendations were established for age-related macular degeneration, 4 for diabetic macular oedema, and 5 for retinal vein occlusion. A total of 1,012 medical records were reviewed by the 4 participating hospitals. The review of medical records revealed that agreed «Do Not Do's¼ occurred in a range between 0.6% and 31.4% of the cases included in the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified «Do Not Do¼ recommendations in these pathologies that occur relatively often in clinical practice. It is necessary to review the healthcare processes that will enable these practices to be eradicated, and the quality of care to be improved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy is an uncommon heredodegenerative disease with different types of inheritance and degrees of severity. METHODS: Findings in five affected members of a family in which the X-linked mode of inheritance of familial exudative vitreoretinopathy is present are discussed. RESULTS: Patients presented with characteristic retinal exudative tractional detachment, temporal retinal vessel traction, capillary dilatation, neovascularization, and vitreous veils. CONCLUSION: A review of the 21 cases of X-linked familial exudative vitreoretinopathy reported to date indicates a worse outcome in this mode of inheritance than in cases of autosomal dominant inheritance.
