Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 23(7): e434-e440, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482498

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that use of electronic medical record (EMR) messaging positively impacts patients with cancer, there is little research on utilization patterns. The objective of this study is to describe the use of EMR messaging among breast cancer patients so that future interventions may be developed and targeted appropriately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sociodemographic and MyChart usage data were collected. Study eligibility included patients who completed a visit at an academic breast center and sent at least one message to a provider during the study period (May 2021-May 2022). Chi-square and t-tests were used to describe differences between users and nonusers of EMR messaging. ANOVA and chi-square were used to describe differences between race/ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 4069 patients with activated MyChart accounts were included in the analysis. About 3575 (87.9%) were messaging users and 494 (12.1%) were nonusers. The mean age of users was significantly lower compared to the nonusers (57.7 vs 61.2, P< .001). Compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.38, CI [0.21, 0.37]) and Hispanic individuals (OR: 0.35, CI [0.22, 0.57]) were significantly less likely to use electronic messaging. There were statistically significant racial/ethnic differences in the types of messages sent among EMR users. CONCLUSION: Our study shows disparate EMR messaging utilization based on age, race, and primary language. As the availability of patient portals and electronic messaging increase, it is important to understand the barriers that patients face so that they can be addressed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Electronic Health Records , Patient Portals , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Ethnicity , Hispanic or Latino , Quality Improvement , Black or African American , White
2.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 51(4): 205-210, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37496308

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests inappropriate oxygenation may be harmful to patients. To improve oxygen use in our hospital, we initiated a quality improvement project with a goal to reduce the percentage of inappropriate utilization of oxygen by 50% within a year. METHODS: Nasal cannula (NC) oxygen use data for medicine inpatients was abstracted weekly for chart review. A multidisciplinary team developed a guideline for use. Initiation of NC O2 with a baseline SPO2 > 92% was deemed inappropriate and 3+ consecutive SPO2 > 96% was defined as over-supplementation. Formal interventions included an oxygen use guideline, updated EMR order, unit-specific feedback, and magnetic placards. Progress was tracked by control charts. RESULTS: Baseline data revealed 40% of patients were inappropriately placed on oxygen and 55% of patients had one instance of excessive supplementation. Only half of all improper uses of oxygen had charted medical reasoning, and 30% had a corresponding order. Instances of proper oxygen use had orders 48% of the time. Run charts revealed inappropriate initiation was significantly reduced to 27.1% (p < 0.0001) and excessive oxygenation decreased significantly to 34.4% (p < 0.0001) following interventions with no effect on other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our interventions significantly decreased improper oxygen initiation and excessive supplementation.


Subject(s)
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Oxygen , Humans , Inpatients
3.
Med Educ Online ; 28(1): 2207249, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37104856

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic diminished opportunities for medical students to gain clinical confidence and the ability to contribute to patient care. Our study sought out to understand the value of telephone outreach to schedule COVID-19 vaccines on medical student education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty students engaged in telephone outreach targeting patients aged 65+ without active patient portals to schedule COVID-19 vaccines. Data consisted of a single administration retrospective pre/post survey inquiring about what students learned, expectations, other health-care processes that would benefit from outreach, and interest in a population health elective. Likert items were analyzed and open response analysis involved inductive coding and generation of thematic summaries by condensing codes into broader themes. Demographic data of patients called and subsequently received the vaccine were also collected. RESULTS: There were 33 survery respondents. There was a statistically significant increase in net comfortability for pre-clerkship students for documenting in Epic, providing telehealth care, counseling on common health-care myths, having challenging conversations, cold-calling patients, and developing an initial trusting relationship with patients. The majority called and who received the vaccine were non-Hispanic Black, within the high SVI category, and had Medicare and/or Medicaid. Qualitative data showed that students emphasized communication, the role of trusted messengers, the need to be open minded, and meeting patients where they are. DISCUSSION: Engaging students in telephone outreach early in the COVID-19 pandemic provided students the opportunity to develop their skills as physicians-in-training, contribute to combating the ongoing pandemic, and add value to the primary care team. This experience allowed students to practice patience, empathy, and vulnerability to understand why patients had not received the COVID-19 vaccine; this was an invaluable experience that helped students develop the skills to become empathetic and caring physicians, and supports the continued role of telehealth in future medical school curriculum.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Students, Medical , Aged , United States , Humans , Students, Medical/psychology , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Medicare , Curriculum , Telephone , Vaccination
4.
WMJ ; 122(5): 438-443, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180942

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Equitable COVID-19 vaccine access is essential to ending the COVID-19 pandemic. In many instances, COVID-19 vaccination notification and scheduling occurred through online patient portals, for which socially vulnerable populations have limited access. Our objective was to reduce disparities in COVID-19 vaccine access for the Black and socially vulnerable populations unintentionally excluded by our health system's patient portal-driven vaccine outreach through a telephone outreach initiative. METHODS: From February 1, 2021, through April 27, 2021, telephone outreach was directed towards patients aged 65 and older without patient portal access at a large urban academic general internal medicine clinic. Univariate and multivariate analyses between those who did and did not receive telephone outreach were completed to assess the odds of vaccination, accounting for outreach status, sex, age, race/ethnicity, payor status, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count. RESULTS: A total of 1466 patients aged 65 and older without active patient portals were eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Of these patients, 664 received outreach calls; 382 (57.5%) of them got vaccinated compared to 802 patients who did not receive outreach calls, of which 486 (60.6%) got vaccinated (P = 0.2341). Patients who received outreach calls versus those who did not were more likely to be female, younger, non-Hispanic Black, from high social vulnerability index census tracts, and have higher Elixhauser Comorbidity counts. Logistical analysis revealed an odds ratio (OR) with a nonstatistically significant trend favoring higher vaccination likelihood in the no outreach cohort with univariate analysis with no changes when adjustment was made for age, sex, race/ethnicity, payor, social vulnerability index, and Elixhauser Comorbidity count (univariate analysis: OR 0.88 [95% CI, 0.71-1.09]; model 1: OR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72 - 1.10]; model 2 - 0.89 (0.72 - 1.11); model 3: OR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.70 -1.09)]. CONCLUSIONS: While our telephone outreach initiative was not successful in increasing vaccination rates, lessons learned can help clinicians and health systems as they work to improve health equity. Achieving health equity requires a multifaceted approach engaging not only health systems but also public health and community systems to directly address the pervasive effects of structural racism perpetuating health inequities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Equity , Humans , Female , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Pandemics/prevention & control , Vaccination , Primary Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...