ABSTRACT
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most frequent form of dementia and according to the most recent estimation it affects nearly 27 million people in the world. The onset of the disease is generally insidious. It is becoming increasingly evident that the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are active long before the appearance of the clinical symptoms of the disease. In the current context, it is important to develop strategies to delay the onset of cognitive decline. Delaying the onset by 5 years would reduce the prevalence by half at term, and a delay of 10 years would reduce it by three-quarters. The effectiveness of currently suggested preventive approaches remains to be confirmed, but certain strategies could be applied straight away to at-risk subjects. We propose that a health-promoting memory consultation should be set up for elderly persons who have attended a specialized memory consultation and in whom the diagnosis of dementia and of AD in particular, has not been established by standardized tools. Through this consultation, they would be offered full multidimensional investigation of all aspects of their health status, follow-up could be organized, general practitioners in private practice could be made more conscious of this population and the elderly could be made more aware of the risk factors to which they are exposed. The development of an information policy for the elderly would meet a present need. In our reflection, we must take into account the question of how to give this preventive consultation its due place in the healthcare pathway of the elderly person in order to ensure coordinated follow-up with all the other health professionals involved. The principle of the health-promoting memory consultation is undergoing validation in a large French multicentre preventive trial in 1200 frail elderly persons aged 70 years followed for three years, the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT).
Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Dementia/prevention & control , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Memory Disorders/prevention & control , Memory/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Disease Progression , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Memory Disorders/epidemiology , Memory Disorders/physiopathology , Referral and Consultation , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A national survey has been conducted with 349 general practitioners in order to analyze the management of concerned episodic headache in general practice. METHOD: This survey enabled collection of data from 2537 headache patients. The main data concered IHS diagnosis, severity of headache using the MIGSEV scale, management, practices and the impact on daily living (QVM and HIT-6 scales). RESULTS: Out of the 2537 included patients, 52 percent were migraine sufferers according to IHS criteria (code 1.1/1.2), 34 percent presented with migrainous disorders (code 1.7), and 14 percent were non-migraine headache patients. The distribution of management practices showed that 71 percent of them were given non-specific treatments, 46 percent of them specific treatments and 27 percent of them prophylactic treatments. Analysis of the impact of headache using the QVM or the HIT-6 demonstrated a relationship between diagnosis, migraine severity and disability. Analysis of the correlation between the severity of the last migraine attack as evaluated by the patient and that estimated by the doctor showed that the practitioner tended to underestimate the patient's pain. These results highlight the importance of communication between practitioners and migraine sufferers. CONCLUSION: Training of general practitioners in the use of simple tools such as the HIT-6 scale, should be helpful for a better evaluation of the impact of headache on daily living, and hence should lead to more optimal therapeutic management of headache patients.
