Total Hip Arthroplasty: Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in the First Year of Practice.

Background: The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been popularized as a less invasive technique, however outcomes within the first year of practice after fellowship have not been investigated. The primary aim was to determine differences in complications and outcomes between DAA and posterior approach (PA) in the first year of practice. The secondary aim was to determine if there was a learning curve factor in DAA and PA after fellowship training. Methods: THA cases performed by two surgeons during their first year of practice were reviewed. Overall, 181 THAs (91 DAA, 90 PA) in 168 patients, were performed. Intraoperative differences (blood loss, operative time), hospital stay, complications, reoperations, and revisions were compared. Results: Overall surgical complications were similar between DAA and PA (11% vs. 9%, p=0.64), but complication profiles were different: dislocation (1% vs. 4%, p=0.17), intraoperative femoral fracture (2% vs. 1%, p=0.32), postoperative periprosthetic fractures (2% vs. 3%, p=0.64). neuropraxia (3% vs. 0%, p=0.08). There was no difference in rate of reoperation (1% vs. 3%, p=0.31). There was a difference in rate of revision at final follow-up (0% vs. 6%, p=0.02). DAA consisted of longer operative time (111 vs. 99 minutes; p<0.001), however was only significant in the first 50 cases (p<0.001), while the subsequent cases were similar (p=0.31). There was no difference in the first 50 cases compared to the subsequent cases for either approach regarding blood loss, complications, reoperations, or revisions. Conclusion: DAA and PA for THA performed within the first year of practice exhibit similarly low complication rates, but complication profiles are different. In our series, PA did demonstrate a higher risk of revision at final follow-up. A learning curve is not unique to the DAA. Both DAA and PA THA exhibited a learning curve in the first 50 cases performed at the start of a surgeon's practice. Level of Evidence: III.

Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Conditions Policy: A Problem of Nonpayment After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) utilization continues to increase, and optimizing efficiency while reducing complications is critical to provide a sustainable product. Recent policy has defined several hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) that are the target of reducing complications with significant financial implications. The present study defines the incidence of HACs after TJA as well as patient and hospital factors associated with HACs. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to identify all patients from 2009 to 2011 undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were obtained from the database, and HACs defined according to established International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification criteria. The incidence of HACs after TJA was calculated, as were demographic factors and preadmission comorbidities associated with HACs using bivariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of HACs after TJA was 1.3%. Several patient and hospital factors, including increased age, female gender, black race, medium hospital bed size, year of surgery, and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1, independently predicted development of a HAC. When evaluating the financial impact of the development of a HAC after TJA, more than 200 million dollars in hospital costs would be lost during the inclusive years of this study, equating to nearly 70 million dollars annually. CONCLUSION: The incidence of HACs after TJA is 1.3%. Many of the patient factors associated with HACs are nonmodifiable, and risk adjustment should be considered to provide a sustainable product to a diverse patient population.