Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Vasc Med ; 28(4): 331-339, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37259526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known complication of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients requiring hospitalization and intensive care. We examined the association between extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with an index positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at the time of, or during hospitalization. Patients who were prescribed extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis were compared against patients who were not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to produce odds ratio (OR) estimates and Cox proportional hazard models for hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI to examine the association between pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and outcomes of interest. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day VTE events. Secondary outcomes included 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day superficial venous thrombosis (SVT), acute myocardial infarction (MI), acute ischemic stroke, critical limb ischemia, clinically significant bleeding, and inpatient readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 1936 patients were included in the study. Among them, 731 (38%) were discharged on extended pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. No significant difference was found in 30- and 90-day VTE events among groups. Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis showed improved survival at 30 (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.59) and 90 days (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.55) and reduced inpatient readmission at 30 days (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.04-0.33) when compared to those without. CONCLUSION: Patients discharged on extended VTE prophylaxis after hospitalization due to COVID-19 had similar thrombotic events on follow-up. However, use of extended VTE prophylaxis was associated with improved 30- and 90-day survival and reduced risk of 30-day inpatient readmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ischemic Stroke , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Hospitalization , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy
2.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 29: 10760296231156414, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890702

ABSTRACT

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are prescribed in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism (PE). Evidence is limited regarding the outcomes and optimal timing of DOACs in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE treated with thrombolysis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of outcomes among patients with intermediate- and high-risk PE who received thrombolysis, by choice of long-term anticoagulant agent. Outcomes of interest included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, bleeding, stroke, readmission, and mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to examine characteristics and outcomes among patients, by anticoagulation group. Patients receiving a DOAC (n = 53) had shorter hospital LOS compared to those in warfarin (n = 39) and enoxaparin (n = 10) groups (mean LOS 3.6, 6.3 and 4.5 days, respectively; P < .0001). This single institution retrospective study suggests DOAC initiation <48 h from thrombolysis may result in shorter hospital LOS compared to DOAC initiation ≥48 h (P < .0001). Further larger studies with more robust research methodology are needed to address this important clinical question.


Subject(s)
Factor Xa Inhibitors , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/chemically induced , Anticoagulants , Administration, Oral , Thrombolytic Therapy
3.
BMJ Open ; 12(2): e050879, 2022 02 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes in hospitalised patients with sepsis and reported penicillin allergy (PcnA). DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study using data from electronic health records. SETTING: A large single health system with 11 hospitals of small, medium and large sizes including a 630-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=5238) ≥18 years of age, hospitalised with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, received antibacterial agents, and had documented PcnA status. Patients <18 years of age at admission were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes evaluated were inpatient mortality and 30-day mortality posthospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day readmissions, duration of antibiotic use, rate of Clostridium difficile infection and total cost of care. RESULTS: There was no difference in outcomes including inpatient or 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, in-hospital antibiotic duration, C. difficile infection, total cost of care and 30-day readmission rate between patients labelled with a PcnA vs patients who did not report PcnA (non-PcnA). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective single health system study, there was no difference in key outcomes including inpatient or 30-day mortality in patients admitted with sepsis and reported PcnA compared with patients who reported no PcnA.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Drug Hypersensitivity , Sepsis , Shock, Septic , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Penicillins/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/drug therapy
4.
Am J Med Sci ; 363(1): 42-47, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34666063

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the gold standard for alcohol withdrawal treatment but choice and dosing vary widely. In 2015, our institution implemented a Minnesota detoxification scale (MINDS) and single standardized high-dose diazepam based protocol for treatment of alcohol withdrawal to replace multiple Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) based protocols using lower dose benzodiazepines. We compared use of MINDS versus CIWA assessment protocols with high front loading diazepam treatment in care of patient experiencing alcohol withdrawal during hospitalization. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients experiencing alcohol withdrawal to statistically analyze difference in outcomes between CIWA based lower benzodiazepine dose protocols used in 2013-2015 versus the MINDS based high-dose front-loading diazepam protocol used in 2015-2017. RESULTS: Patients treated with MINDS based high dose diazepam protocol were less likely to have physical restraints used (AOR = 0.8, CI: 0.70-0.92), had a shorter hospital length of stay, and fewer days on benzodiazepines (p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days (AOR = 1.13, CI: 1.03-1.26) in MINDS based diazepam treatment group. Total diazepam equivalent dosing was similar in both groups. Mortality rates and ICU use rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose front loading long acting benzodiazepine can be safely used with beneficial outcomes in hospitalized alcohol withdrawal patients.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Diazepam/therapeutic use , Ethanol , Humans , Minnesota , Retrospective Studies , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy
5.
BMC Pediatr ; 21(1): 327, 2021 07 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34315435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infectious morbidity and mortality in the first week of life is commonly caused by early-onset neonatal Group B streptococcus (GBS) disease. This infection is spread from GBS positive mothers to neonates by vertical transmission during delivery and results in serious illness for newborns. Intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics have decreased the incidence of early-onset neonatal GBS disease by 80%. Patients labeled with a penicillin allergy (PcnA) alternatively receive either vancomycin or clindamycin but effectiveness is controversial. We evaluated the influence of a reported PcnA label versus no PcnA label on inpatient maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Our goal was to examine the relationship between a PcnA label, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and hospital costs. We collected retrospective data with institutional IRB approval from 2016 - 2018 for hospitalized patients who were GBS positive, pregnant at time of admission, ≥ 18 years of age, received antibiotic prophylaxis for GBS, were labeled as PcnA or non-PcnA, and completed a vaginal delivery. Patient characteristics and maternal/neonatal outcomes were examined. Statistical tests included calculations of means, medians, proportions, Mann-Whitney, two-sample t-tests, Chi-squared or Fisher's Exact tests, and generalized linear and logistic regression models. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Most PcnA patients were white, older, had a higher median body mass index and mean heart rate, and a greater proportion used tobacco than non-PcnA patients. In regression analyses, PcnA hospitalized patients received a shorter duration of antibiotic treatment than non-PcnA patients [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53]. PcnA patients were also more likely to have their baby's hospital LOS be > 48 h [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.69] even though the PcnA mothers' LOS was not different from non-PcnA mothers. Cost of care, mortality, intensive care, median parity, mean gravidity, and miscarriage were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized obstetric patients, a PcnA label was associated with a shorter maternal course of antibiotic treatment and a longer neonatal LOS. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the underlying reasons for these outcomes.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Streptococcal Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Mothers , Penicillins/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/epidemiology , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus agalactiae
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 73: 78-85, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33333197

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the most pronounced and poorly understood pathological features of COVID-19 infection has been high risk for venous and arterial thromboembolic complications. An increasing number of thromboembolic events are being reported almost on a daily basis, and the medical community has struggled to predict and mitigate this risk. We aimed to review available literature on the risk and management of COVID-19 related venous thromboembolism (VTE), and provide evidence-based guidance to manage these events. METHODS: A literature review of VTE complications in patients with COVID-19 was performed, in addition to a summary of the societal guidelines and present pathways implemented at our institution for the management of both in- and outpatient COVID-19 related VTE. RESULTS: Although a significant VTE risk has been confirmed in patients with COVID-19, literature addressing best ways to mitigate this risk is lacking. Furthermore, there has been very limited guidance provided by societal guidelines to help prevent and manage VTE associated with the COVID-19 infection. In light of the available data, we advise that all patients admitted with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 receive pharmacological prophylaxis if bleeding risk is acceptable. For patients with COVID-19 who have been discharged from the emergency department or hospital, we suggest extended thromboprophylaxis (up to 39 days) as long as bleeding risk is low. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this literature summary along with our center recommendations and algorithms provide valuable guidance to providers caring for patients with COVID-19 related VTE. More research is needed to standardize prophylaxis and management protocols for these patients.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Algorithms , Humans , Risk Factors , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
8.
South Med J ; 112(7): 357-362, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31282963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The influence of postdischarge telephone call interventions preventing hospital readmissions is unclear. A novel approach of the discharging hospitalist providing this intervention may improve overall patient satisfaction. Our objective was to assess the impact of postdischarge telephone calls from discharging hospitalists on readmissions and patients' ratings of hospital care and hospitalist communication. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from patients' electronic health records at a 167-bed hospital in Fridley, Minnesota and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Patients were 18 years old or older and diagnosed as having nonpsychiatric conditions. Telephone calls were made by the discharging hospitalist to adult patients discharged to home with or without home care services between February 28, 2015 and February 29, 2016. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of postdischarge telephone calls with global hospital care rating and hospitalist communication from HCAHPS, and 30-day readmission rates from electronic health records. RESULTS: Of 4490 eligible patients, 1067 had completed telephone calls (23.8%). The intervention was associated with a statistically significant improvement in the responses to HCAHPS overall hospital rating and HCAHPS doctor communication questions (adjusted odds ratio 1.52, P = 0.04 and adjusted odds ratio 1.56, P = 0.021) that varied by patient age at first admission (P = 0.001 and P = 0.101). With longer inpatient lengths of stay, 30-day readmission rates improved after patients received a postdischarge telephone call, but this outcome was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that postdischarge telephone calls from discharging hospitalists increased patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to understand the causal relationships among the intervention, 30-day hospital readmission rates, and inpatient length of stay.


Subject(s)
Hospitalists , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Telephone , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Retrospective Studies
9.
Radiat Res ; 188(5): 532-551, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28945526

ABSTRACT

Astronauts traveling to Mars will be exposed to chronic low doses of galactic cosmic space radiation, which contains highly charged, high-energy (HZE) particles. 56Fe-HZE-particle exposure decreases hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) neurogenesis and disrupts hippocampal function in young adult rodents, raising the possibility of impaired astronaut cognition and risk of mission failure. However, far less is known about how exposure to other HZE particles, such as 28Si, influences hippocampal neurogenesis and function. To compare the influence of 28Si exposure on indices of neurogenesis and hippocampal function with previous studies on 56Fe exposure, 9-week-old C57BL/6J and Nestin-GFP mice (NGFP; made and maintained for 10 or more generations on a C57BL/6J background) received whole-body 28Si-particle-radiation exposure (0, 0.2 and 1 Gy, 300 MeV/n, LET 67 KeV/µ, dose rate 1 Gy/min). For neurogenesis assessment, the NGFP mice were injected with the mitotic marker BrdU at 22 h postirradiation and brains were examined for indices of hippocampal proliferation and neurogenesis, including Ki67+, BrdU+, BrdU+NeuN+ and DCX+ cell numbers at short- and long-term time points (24 h and 3 months postirradiation, respectively). In the short-term group, stereology revealed fewer Ki67+, BrdU+ and DCX+ cells in 1-Gy-irradiated group relative to nonirradiated control mice, fewer Ki67+ and DCX+ cells in 0.2 Gy group relative to control group and fewer BrdU+ and DCX+ cells in 1 Gy group relative to 0.2 Gy group. In contrast to the clearly observed radiation-induced, dose-dependent reductions in the short-term group across all markers, only a few neurogenesis indices were changed in the long-term irradiated groups. Notably, there were fewer surviving BrdU+ cells in the 1 Gy group relative to 0- and 0.2-Gy-irradiated mice in the long-term group. When the short- and long-term groups were analyzed by sex, exposure to radiation had a similar effect on neurogenesis indices in male and female mice, although only male mice showed fewer surviving BrdU+ cells in the long-term group. Fluorescent immunolabeling and confocal phenotypic analysis revealed that most surviving BrdU+ cells in the long-term group expressed the neuronal marker NeuN, definitively confirming that exposure to 1 Gy 28Si radiation decreased the number of surviving adult-generated neurons in male mice relative to both 0- and 0.2-Gy-irradiated mice. For hippocampal function assessment, 9-week-old male C57BL/6J mice received whole-body 28Si-particle exposure and were then assessed long-term for performance on contextual and cued fear conditioning. In the context test the animals that received 0.2 Gy froze less relative to control animals, suggesting decreased hippocampal-dependent function. However, in the cued fear conditioning test, animals that received 1 Gy froze more during the pretone portion of the test, relative to controls and 0.2-Gy-irradiated mice, suggesting enhanced anxiety. Compared to previously reported studies, these data suggest that 28Si-radiation exposure damages neurogenesis, but to a lesser extent than 56Fe radiation and that low-dose 28Si exposure induces abnormalities in hippocampal function, disrupting fear memory but also inducing anxiety-like behavior. Furthermore, exposure to 28Si radiation decreased new neuron survival in long-term male groups but not females suggests that sex may be an important factor when performing brain health risk assessment for astronauts traveling in space.


Subject(s)
Conditioning, Psychological/radiation effects , Dentate Gyrus/cytology , Fear/psychology , Neurogenesis/radiation effects , Neurons/cytology , Silicon , Whole-Body Irradiation/adverse effects , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Behavior, Animal/radiation effects , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Cosmic Radiation , Dentate Gyrus/physiology , Dentate Gyrus/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Doublecortin Protein , Fear/radiation effects , Female , Memory/physiology , Memory/radiation effects , Mice , Neurons/radiation effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...