Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Target Oncol ; 13(4): 461-468, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29882102

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and calcium leucovorin plus nab-paclitaxel and oxaliplatin have been shown to be active in patients with pancreatic cancer. As a protracted low-dose infusion, 5FU is antiangiogenic, and has synergy with bevacizumab. As shown in the treatment of breast cancer, bevacizumab and nab-paclitaxel are also synergetic. OBJECTIVE: In this paper we retrospectively analyze the survival of 65 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were treated with low-dose continuous (metronomic) chemotherapy given in conjunction with conventional anti-VEGF therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since July of 2008, we have treated 65 patients with 5FU (180 mg/m2/day × 14 days) via an ambulatory pump. Calcium leucovorin (20 mg/m2 IV), nab-paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) IV as a 30-min infusion, and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2) IV as a 60-min infusion were given on days 1, 8, and 15. Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) IV over 30 min was administered on days 1 and 15. Cycles were repeated every 28-35 days. There were 42 women and 23 men, and the median age was 59 years. Forty-six patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS: The median survival was 19 months, with 82% of patients surviving 12 months or longer. The overall response rate was 49%. There were 28 patients who had received prior treatment, 15 of whom responded to therapy. Fifty-two patients had elevated CA 19-9 prior to treatment. Of these, 21 patients had 90% or greater reduction in CA 19-9 levels. This cohort had an objective response rate of 71% and a median survival of 27 months. Thirty patients stopped treatment due to disease progression, and an additional 22 stopped because of toxicity. One patient died while on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This non-gemcitabine-based regimen resulted in higher response rates and better survival than what is commonly observed with therapy given at conventional dosing schedules. Low-dose continuous (metronomic therapy) cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is safe and effective.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis
2.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 1(3): 162-8, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19808410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is common practice to empirically limit the radiofrequency (RF) power when ablating the posterior left atrium during atrial fibrillation ablation to avoid thermal injury to the esophagus. The objective of this study was to determine whether RF energy delivery limited by luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring is associated with a reduction in esophageal injury compared with a strategy of RF power limitation alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-one consecutive patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation followed by esophageal endoscopy were included in this observational study. All patients underwent extraostial electric pulmonary vein isolation by using an electroanatomic mapping system and irrigated RF ablation. All RF applications on the posterior left atrium were limited to 35 W. A commercially available, single-thermocouple esophageal probe was used to monitor LET in a subset of patients (n=67). In these cases, applications were promptly interrupted when LET was > or =38.5 degrees C; further applications were performed at reduced power to obtain a LET < 38.5 degrees C. Esophageal endoscopy was performed 1 to 3 days after the procedure. Ablation-related esophageal ulcerations were identified in 9 of 81 (11%) patients. All patients were asymptomatic. Of these 81 patients, LET monitoring during ablation occurred in 67 (83%) of patients. Esophageal injury was observed more frequently (36% versus 6%, P<0.006) in the group without LET monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that LET monitoring may be associated with a reduction in esophageal injury compared with power limitation alone.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Body Temperature/physiology , Burns/prevention & control , Catheter Ablation/methods , Esophagus/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Burns/etiology , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Esophagus/injuries , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 9(2): 555-61, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12576418

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Localized pancreatic carcinoma is rarely resectable and is resistant to conventional therapies. ONYX-015 (dl1520) is an E1B-55kD gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus that preferentially replicates in and kills malignant cells. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has the potential to conveniently and accurately deliver local therapy to the pancreas. Therefore, we undertook a trial of the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of EUS injection of ONYX-015 into unresectable pancreatic carcinomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-one patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or with metastatic disease, but minimal or absent liver metastases, underwent eight sessions of ONYX-015 delivered by EUS injection into the primary pancreatic tumor over 8 weeks. The final four treatments were given in combination with gemcitabine (i.v., 1,000 mg/m(2)). Patients received 2 x 10(10) (n = 3) or 2 x 10(11) (n = 18) virus particles/treatment. RESULTS: After combination therapy, 2 patients had partial regressions of the injected tumor, 2 had minor responses, 6 had stable disease, and 11 had progressive disease or had to go off study because of treatment toxicity. No clinical pancreatitis occurred despite mild, transient elevations in lipase in a minority of patients. Two patients had sepsis before the institution of prophylactic oral antibiotics. Two patients had duodenal perforations from the rigid endoscope tip. No perforations occurred after the protocol was changed to transgastic injections only. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that ONYX-015 injection via EUS into pancreatic carcinomas by the transgastic route with prophylactic antibiotics is feasible and generally well tolerated either alone or in combination with gemcitabine. Transgastric EUS-guided injection is a new and practical method of delivering biological agents to pancreatic tumors.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenoviridae/genetics , Adenoviridae/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization , Injections, Intralesional , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Selection , Safety , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...