Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 20(8): 1156-60, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15977027

ABSTRACT

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project has collected data on all adolescent hemodialysis patients since 2000. Thus, by 2002 data were available on all adolescents on hemodialysis in the USA for 3 consecutive years. Possible associations between clinical parameters and linear growth in this cohort were evaluated. Ninety-four adolescents were on hemodialysis for the 3 study years. The mean height standard deviation score (ht SDS) fell from -1.97 to -2.36 over the 3 study years. Compared with patients with ht SDS > or =-1.88, patients with ht SDS <-1.88 in the 2002 study year (n =53) were more likely to be male (66% vs 44%, p <0.05), on dialysis longer (6.9+/-4.5 years vs 4.1+/-2.3 years, p <0.001), and had lower height SDS in the 2000 study year (-2.90+/-1.31 vs -0.772+/-1.10, p <0.001). Patients with a ht SDS <-1.88 had a lower mean hemoglobin (11.4+/-1.6 g/dl vs 12.0+/-1.1 g/dl, p <0.05), but there were no differences in other clinical parameters. Among patients with ht SDS <-1.88, 38.8% (n =20) were prescribed recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the 2002 study year. There were no differences in demographic or clinical parameters between rhGH treated and untreated patients. Many adolescents who remain on hemodialysis have poor linear growth. Further evaluation is needed to delineate contributory factors and the possible underutilization of rhGH.


Subject(s)
Growth , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Renal Dialysis , Adolescent , Child , Female , Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood , Male , Malnutrition/physiopathology
2.
Diabetes Care ; 27(9): 2198-203, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15333484

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, especially those with diabetes, have an increased risk of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA). The present study aims to examine the association of demographic and clinical variables with the risk of hospitalization for LEA among incident hemodialysis patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study population consisted of incident hemodialysis patients from the study years 1996-1999 of the ESRD Core Indicator/Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to identify factors associated with LEA. RESULTS: Four percent (116 of 3,272) of noncensored incident patients had an LEA during the 12-month follow-up period. Factors associated with LEA included diabetes as the cause of ESRD or preexisting comorbidity (hazard ratio 6.4, 95% CI 3.4-12.0), cardiovascular comorbidity (1.8, 1.2-2.8), hemodialysis inadequacy (urea reduction ratio [URR] <58.5% (1.9, 1.1-3.3), and lower serum albumin level (1.6, 1.1-2.3). Among patients with diabetes, hemodialysis inadequacy and cardiovascular comorbidity were risk factors for LEA (2.6, 1.4-4.8, and 1.7, 1.1-2.6, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that diabetes is a potent risk factor for LEA in new hemodialysis patients. In ESRD patients with diabetes, a multipronged approach may reduce the rate of LEA. Potentially beneficial strategies include adherence to hemodialysis adequacy guidelines, aggressive treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities, and the utilization of LEA prevention strategies recommended for the general population of patients with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Leg/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diabetic Foot/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Dialysis , Risk Factors , Time Factors
3.
Kidney Int ; 65(4): 1426-34, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15086485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding the quality of care for Native American hemodialysis patients. Outcomes, including 1-year hospitalization and mortality, for adult Native American in-center hemodialysis patients selected for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) Project were compared to those for white and black patients to determine if disparity in care existed for this group. METHODS: Clinical data were abstracted from medical records for the last quarters of 1995 to 1998 and linked to United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data files for data on comorbidities and 1-year hospitalization and mortality. Associations of race were tested by bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Two percent (467 of 27876) of patients were Native American, 37% black, and 51% white. Native American, compared to black and white patients, were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as the cause of ESRD (72%, 37%, and 38%, respectively, P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, Native American patients were more likely to achieve a mean urea reduction ratio (URR) > or = 65% compared to whites (referent) [hazards ratio (HR) (95% CI) 1.7 (1.3, 2.2)] and be dialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula [HR (95% CI) 1.7 (1.2, 2.5)]. They were as likely as Whites to achieve a mean hematocrit > or =33% and a mean serum albumin > or =4.0/3.7 g/dL. In multivariate analyses, Native Americans were no more likely to be hospitalized or die during the follow-up period than whites. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that adult Native American hemodialysis patients experience equivalent or better dialytic care and are no more likely to experience 1-year hospitalization or mortality compared to whites.


Subject(s)
Indians, North American , Kidney Failure, Chronic/ethnology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Aged , Black People , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States , White People
4.
Arch Intern Med ; 163(12): 1430-9, 2003 Jun 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12824092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National efforts have focused attention on quality of care, but relatively little is known about whether, and to what extent, improvement has occurred during this recent period. Furthermore, the variability of the recent change over time is not known. METHODS: We sought to determine national and state trends in quality of care for Medicare patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 1994-1995 (n = 234754 discharges) and 1998-1999 (n = 35713 discharges) as part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) National AMI Project. We assessed change in evidence-based, guideline-recommended processes of care. RESULTS: Nationally, among patients without contraindications to therapy, discharge beta-blocker prescription increased by 20.5 percentage points (50.3% to 70.7%); early administration of beta-blocker increased by 17.4 percentage points (51.1% to 68.4%); discharge angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescription for systolic dysfunction increased by 8.0 percentage points (62.8% to 70.8%); early administration of aspirin increased by 6.6 percentage points (76.4% to 82.9%); and aspirin prescribed at discharge increased by 5.6 percentage points (77.3% to 82.9%) (P<.001 for all categories). Smoking cessation counseling decreased by 3.6 percentage points (40.8% to 37.2%; P<.001). Rates of acute reperfusion therapy did not significantly change (59.2% to 60.6%; P =.35). The median time from hospital arrival to initiation of thrombolytic therapy decreased by 7 minutes (P<.001); and the median time from hospital arrival to initiation of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty decreased by 12 minutes (P =.09). CONCLUSIONS: During this 4-year period, quality of care for AMI improved, but substantial variation was observed at both time points. While meaningful population-based improvement has been achieved, ample opportunities for improvement exist. Further work is required to elucidate the strategies associated with improvements in quality of care.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Quality of Health Care/trends , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Medicare , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quality Indicators, Health Care/trends , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , United States
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 41(2): 433-41, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12552507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urea reduction ratio (URR) and hematocrit values reported on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) claims were compared with data from two different databases. METHODS: URRs and hematocrits from two different CMS databases (National Claims History and End-Stage Renal Disease Clinical Performance Measures [CPM] Project) and one Network database (The Renal Network Data System [TRNDS]) were compared for October through December 1998 and December 1998, respectively. A sample of records from the regional database was validated by independent chart review. RESULTS: Nationally, the percentage of agreement for patients with URRs of 65% or greater and less than 65% was 94% (kappa, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.83); regionally, the percentage of agreement was 95% (kappa, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.86). Nationally, linear regression of hematocrit values from both data sources yielded r(2) congruent with 0.61 each month and r(2) = 0.70 for average values during the 3-month study period. Nationally, the percentage of agreement for patients with hematocrits of 33% or greater and less than 33% was 84% (kappa approximately 0.66) each month. Regionally, linear regression of monthly hematocrit values from both data sources yielded r(2) = 0.66, and percentage of agreement for patients with hematocrits of 33% or greater and less than 33% was 87% (kappa, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.73). Validation of a sample of records in the TRNDS database resulted in 98% agreement for patients with URRs of 65% or greater and less than 65% and 96% agreement for patients with hematocrits of 33% or greater and less than 33%. CONCLUSION: Although there is general agreement between clinical variables submitted on the claims and in the CPM Project, some variation exists. Data from either source yield the same information when classifying patients as above or below threshold values.


Subject(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Hematocrit/statistics & numerical data , Urea/metabolism , Urea/urine , Anemia/therapy , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Computer Communication Networks/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Regional Medical Programs/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis/statistics & numerical data , Sampling Studies , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...