Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1-2 mg/kg per day. RESULTS: At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P=0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P=0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P=0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P=0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P=0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). CONCLUSION: Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.

[Hand-assisted laparoscopic bi-nephrectomy for refractory arterial hypertension in kidney transplantation]. / Bi-néphrectomie laparoscopique assistée manuellement pour hypertension artérielle réfractaire chez le transplanté rénal.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report their preliminary experience of a manually assisted laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy technique for refractory hypertension in renal transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April and May 1999, 2 laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomies were performed with manual assistance using the Hand-Port. One patient was operated 4 months before renal transplantation and the other was operated 13 months after renal transplantation. Both patients presented severe hypertension refractory to several antihypertensive drugs. An 8 cm midline supra-umbilical incision and 3 trocars were necessary. One hand was introduced into the abdominal cavity via the Hand-Port at the beginning of the operation. The intra-abdominal hand assisted all phases of dissection of the kidney and control of vessels. The renal vessels and ureter were clipped. The kidneys were removed by the intra-abdominal hand through the supra-umbilical incision. RESULTS: Operating times were 200 min and 130 min. Blood loss was 220 ml. No conversion was performed. The duration of major postoperative analgesics was 3 days. Length of hospital stay was 6 days and 7 days. There were no complications. Blood pressure was controlled by bilateral nephrectomy in both cases, with significant reduction of antihypertensive therapy. One year after the operation, both patients were satisfied with the aesthetic result. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy manually assisted by the Hand-Port is an alternative to open bilateral nephrectomy. Larger series are necessary to evaluate the morbidity of this technique.

Multicenter trial of one HLA-DR-matched or mismatched blood transfusion prior to cadaveric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of blood transfusions before cadaveric renal transplantation on allograft survival, although previously well documented, has become controversial in light of their adverse effects. Recently, it has been suggested that their clinical benefits are due to HLA-DR sharing between the blood donor and recipient. METHODS: In this prospective study, 144 naive patients were randomly assigned to receive one unit of blood matched for one-HLA-DR antigen (N = 49), or one unit of mismatched blood (N = 48), or to remain untransfused (N = 47). Graft survival and acute rejection rate were analyzed in 106 cadaveric renal allograft recipients receiving the same immunosuppressive protocol. RESULTS: Graft survival was similar in the three groups at one and five years: 91.7 and 80% in untransfused patients, 90.3 and 79.3% in patients transfused with one DR-antigen-matched unit, and 92.3 and 83.7% in patients transfused with HLA-mismatched blood. The difference in the incidence of six-month post-transplant acute rejections was not statistically significant in the three groups: 12 out of 36, 33.3% in nontransfused patients; 6 out of 31, 19.4% in patients transfused with one DR-matched blood; and 13 out of 39, 33.3% in patients transfused with mismatched blood. CONCLUSION: The results of our prospective randomized trial showed that in a population of naive patients, one transfusion mismatched or matched for one HLA-DR antigen given prior to renal transplantation had no significant effect on the incidence and severity of acute rejection, and did not influence overall long-term graft outcome. Considering the potentially deleterious adverse effects of blood transfusions, the costs, and the considerable logistical efforts required to select and type blood donors, such a procedure cannot be recommended in a routine practice for patients awaiting cadaveric kidney transplantation.

[New immunosuppressive drugs and diabetes]. / Nouveaux immunosuppresseurs et diabète.

Glucocorticoïds, calcineurin inhibitors (especially tacrolimus) and the combination of both are responsible for the occurrence of diabetes mellitus after organ transplantation. These drugs induce both insulin resistance and insulinopenia. Risks factors are well identified: high doses of immunosuppressive drugs, genetic background, age and weight excess. Long-term consequences seem to be as deleterious as those of other types of diabetes mellitus. Modulating the doses of immunosuppressive drugs is efficient in decreasing insulin requirement in transplant recipients but only individualization of immunosuppression taking risks factors into account will permit to decrease the incidence of this side-effect.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a patient with renal artery aneurysm.

Among the transplantation teams there is an increasing interest in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. For technical reasons, the use of the left kidney is recommended. However, considering the shortage of organ donors, it is likely that right-side laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy will need to be considered in selected donors, even those with vascular anomalies. Here we report the first case of right-side live donor laparoscopic nephrectomy in a patient with a renal artery aneurysm. Arteriography showed a 3-cm saccular aneurysm of the main right renal artery located at the bifurcation of the secondary branches and associated with an inferior polar artery coming directly from the aorta. The patient was placed in the lumbotomy position. An 8-cm midline incision was made above the umbilicus to insert the HandPort system (Smith & Nephew S.A., 72019 Le Mans Cedex2, France). Four additional trocars were introduced. Dissection of the renal artery was carried out beyond the level of relieving the aneurysm behind the vena cava. The main and polar arteries were clipped, and the renal vein was stapled. The kidney was removed through the HandPort and perfused cold ex vivo. The warm ischemia time for the kidney was 1 min, and the total operative time was 280 min. Vascular abnomalies were corrected ex vivo. The postoperative course of the donor was uneventful. At 6 months after transplantation, the graft function was normal. The hand-assisted approach is of particular value on the right side where the dissection must be carried out behind the vena cava. The HandPort may save few precious minutes over the sac extraction technique of the standard laparoscopic procedure.

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with mitochondrial cytopathy.

BACKGROUND: The nonspecific lesion of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) can occur as a primary disease or in a variety of secondary settings. In mitochondrial cytopathies (MCs), the phenotypic expression of the disease depends on the degree of cellular dysfunction, and this correlates with the proportion of abnormal mitochondrial DNA in the cells and the dependence of tissues on oxidative metabolism. The most common renal manifestation in MCs is tubular dysfunction; little has been reported about glomerular diseases. METHODS: Cases of four adult patients with FSGS and MC are reported. Routine histology and mitochondrial DNA analysis were carried out on renal biopsies. RESULTS: Family history and clinical manifestations in the four patients with FSGS suggested a diagnosis of MC. An A3243G transition in the mitochondrial DNA tRNA(leu(UUR)) was found in lymphocytes and kidney. Glomerular lesions of FSGS were associated with unusual hyaline lesions, which appeared to represent individual myocyte necrosis in afferent arterioles and small arteries. CONCLUSION: FSGS is a renal manifestation of MCs. The renal lesion can precede other manifestations of the genetic disease by many years. The striking arteriolar lesions in these cases may have resulted in glomerular hypertension and hyperperfusion, leading to secondary epithelial cell abnormalities and, ultimately, FSGS. However, primary epithelial cell dysfunction caused by mitochondrial defects could not be ruled out on morphological grounds. MCs should be considered in cases of so-called primary FSGS, particularly if there is a familial history of diabetes, neuromuscular disorders, or deafness.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome. Recurrence after renal transplantation. Groupe Coopératif de l'Ile-de-France (GCIF).

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is an uncommon cause of end-stage renal failure in adults, and few data are available concerning the outcome of renal transplantation in these patients. We conducted this retrospective multicentric study to appreciate the outcome of adult renal transplant recipients whose primary disease was HUS. Sixteen patients, transplanted between 1975 and 1995, were included in the study. In each case, initial diagnosis of HUS was documented by a kidney biopsy. These 16 patients received a total of 25 allografts: 1 graft for 9 patients, 2 grafts for 5 patients, and 3 grafts for 2 patients. Nine patients (56%) developed definite clinical and pathologic evidence of recurrence on at least 1 graft. Four additional patients (25%) demonstrated only some clinical or pathologic evidence of recurrence which could not be distinguished from acute vascular rejection. Three patients had no sign of recurrence of the initial disease. The 1-year graft survival rate was 63% and the 5-year graft survival rate was 18.5%. In the group of patients with proven or possible recurrence (n = 13), the 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 49% and less than 10%, respectively. The recurrence was an early event, occurring before the end of the first month after transplantation in half the cases. The recurrence rate was 92% in non-nephrectomized patients and 50% in patients with bilateral nephrectomy. In the literature, 71 adult patients with primary HUS had received a total of 90 kidney grafts. Among them, 54% had a recurrence on their graft, which was diagnosed in 52% of the kidney transplants. It is note-worthy that when data from the literature are pooled with our results, the rate of recurrence appears to be significantly lower in binephrectomized patients than in patients with their native kidneys at the time of transplantation (5 of 14 versus 27 of 35 patients, respectively, p = 0.0155). By univariate analysis, no other risk factor for recurrence could be identified. Treatment with cyclosporine A did not influence the recurrence rate. We conclude that recurrence of HUS after renal transplantation is a frequent, early, and severe complication, leading rapidly to graft loss. Prospective studies are needed to confirm that bilateral nephrectomy prior to transplantation decreases the rate of recurrence.

Development of cytomegalovirus resistance to ganciclovir after oral maintenance treatment in a renal transplant recipient.

The emergence of a resistant strain is a theoretical threat after extensive use of antiviral drugs. We report the emergence of a ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) strain in a kidney transplant recipient during oral ganciclovir maintenance treatment. The patient was treated by oral ganciclovir for 2 months after successful treatment of CMV primary infection by intravenous ganciclovir. He developed a new episode of CMV infection with no clinical response to intravenous ganciclovir. The CMV isolate exhibited both phenotypic and genotypic resistance to ganciclovir. The CMV isolate was constituted of a mixture of strains, with and without a mutation at codon 460 of the UL97 gene. The clinical condition improved when mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was discontinued, and a short course of intravenous globulin was added to ganciclovir. The emergence of the CMV strain could be secondary to more potent immunosuppression provide by MMF or subtherapeutic level obtained during oral ganciclovir treatment. We believe that ganciclovir resistance must be part of the differential diagnosis when a patient relapses or fails to respond to ganciclovir treatment.

Cyclosporine withdrawal in stable renal transplant recipients after azathioprine-mycophenolate mofetil conversion.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a nonimmunologic factor of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) in kidney transplant recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dosage reduction or even complete withdrawal in selected populations with CsA nephrotoxicity or CAD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal after azathioprine (AZA)-MMF conversion in a population of stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-eight first cadaver kidney recipients were included. AZA was then discontinued, MMF was introduced and after 4 months CsA was completely withdrawn. All patients underwent inuline clearance measurement and renal biopsy at inclusion and at the end of the follow-up (40 wk). RESULTS: CsA was completely discontinued in 20 patients. No patient lost his graft during the study period, but 1 patient experienced a reversible acute rejection episode. Inuline clearance improved significantly in the whole series. At the end of follow-up, histological worsening was observed in 50% of patients without any specific risk factor. In these patients, inuline clearance did not improve. Systolic blood pressure, the need for anti-hypertensive drugs and HDL cholesterol improved. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients, CsA withdrawal after AZA replacement by MMF switch was safe with regard to acute rejection. It improved blood pressure and the lipid profile, but, in 50% of patients was associated with histologic deterioration.

[Kidney harvesting in living donors with manually assisted laparoscopy: technique and results]. / Prélèvement de rein chez le donneur vivant par laparoscopie assistée manuellement: technique et résultats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and complications of manually assisted laparoscopic live donor kidney harvesting. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Since June 1999, all related live donor kidney harvests have been performed by manually assisted laparoscopy. The patient is placed in the lumbotomy position and an 8 cm midline periumbilical incision is made. The assistant's hand is introduced through a watertight port (HandPort). Three trocars are used. The assistant presents the structures to be dissected and controls the ureter. The artery is clipped and the vein is stapled or clipped, depending on its diameter. The kidney is extracted via the midline incision and washed. RESULTS: Five kidney harvests were performed (three right kidneys and two left kidneys) with a mean operating time of 220 +/- 30 minutes. Conversion was necessary in one case following the intraoperative discovery of two right renal veins. Warm ischaemia lasted 5 minutes for the first patient and one to two minutes for the other four non-converted patients. Blood losses were minimal. The mean duration of major analgesia was 2.4 days and the mean length of hospital stay was 7.2 days. Complications were: bacteriuria in 2 cases and prolonged lymphorrhoea in 1 case. One transplanted kidney had to be removed because of immediate thrombosis of the recipient iliac artery. With a mean follow-up of 6 months (1 to 12 months), no ureteric or venous complications have been observed in the 4 evaluable transplanted kidneys. CONCLUSION: An intra-abdominal hand during laparoscopic live donor kidney harvesting simplifies dissection, ensures intraoperative security and allows rapid extraction of the kidney.

Human herpes virus-8 and other risk factors for Kaposi's sarcoma in kidney transplant recipients. Groupe Cooperatif de Transplantation d' Ile de France (GCIF).

BACKGROUND: The exact reasons for the high incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) after kidney transplantation are still unknown. Immunosuppression is classically considered as the main risk factor, but the relative risk contributed by the patient's geographic origin and by human herpes virus (HHV)-8 infection still has to be determined. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective and a prospective study among kidney transplant recipients (TP) to identify the risk factors for posttransplantation KS. Each of 30 KS patients was matched with two controls to investigate the association with geographic origin, immunosuppressive regimen, HHV-8 antibodies before and after transplantation, and other infections. Among TP with new onset of KS, we prospectively evaluated HHV-8 serology and viremia in response to decreased immunosuppression. RESULTS: African and Middle East origins, past infection with hepatitis B, hemoglobin level <12 g/dl, lymphocyte count <750/mm3 at the time of diagnosis and initial use of polyclonal antilymphocyte sera were risk factors for KS. After multivariate analysis, origin in Africa or Middle East and use of antilymphocyte sera for induction remained as independent risk factors. Sixty-eight percent (17/25) of TP with HHV-8 antibodies before or after transplantation developed KS compared with 3% (1/33) of seronegative TP (P<0.00001). HHV-8 DNA was detectable in seven of nine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and in six of six KS lesions at diagnosis; it became negative in PBMC in three of five patients in parallel with tumor regression. CONCLUSION: African and Middle East geographic origins, HHV-8 infection before and after kidney transplantation, and initial use of polyclonal antilymphocyte sera were independent risk factors for KS. The presence of HHV-8 antibodies before or after transplantation was highly predictive of the emergence of posttransplantation KS and conferred a 28-fold increased risk of KS (odds ratio=28.4; 95% confidence interval: 4.9-279). Detection of HHV-8 DNA within PBMC and KS lesions seems related to tumor burden and evolution.

Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter study. Groupe Cooperatif de Transplantation d'île de France.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of 60 renal transplantations in 53 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because of lupus nephritis was studied retrospectively and compared with 106 controls matched for age, sex, maximum panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level, and date of transplantation. METHODS: The patients received their transplants over a 260-month period (21.5 years) between October 1971 and August 1993. The population was predominantly women (90%), and the mean age at the time of the transplantation was 33.2 years (range: 21-54 years). Fifty-six transplants (93%) were from cadaveric donors, and 4 (7%) were from living-related donors; 46 patients (86%) had primary allografts, and 7 (14%) received a second allograft. The duration of disease before transplantation was 93.6+/-6.2 months, and the duration of dialysis before transplantation was 48+/-6 months. RESULTS: No patient had clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the time of transplantation. The 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 83% and 98%, and the 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 69% and 96%. Actuarial graft and patient survival rates in SLE patients were not significantly different from those of the matched control group. Chronic rejection was the major risk factor for graft loss. Lupus nephritis recurred in the graft of one patient 3 months after transplantation, and there were extrarenal manifestations of SLE in four others. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that patients with SLE can receive transplants with excellent graft and patient survival rates and a low rate of clinical recurrent lupus nephritis.