ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities have a shorter life expectancy, but healthcare improvements mean that they are beginning to live longer, with associated health difficulties. This means that there is an urgent need to focus research on ageing as well as end-of-life care. This study aimed to explore a specialist intellectual disability service for older people who are dying and how it related to their quality of life and to costs associated with care provided. METHOD: Data were collected for nine residents and 15 staff members of the specialist service. A single case study design with mixed methods including observations, interviews, standardized questionnaires and costs analysis was utilized. RESULTS: We found positive results regarding overall quality of life, although individuals had limited social networks. Placement fees paid by local health trusts and social services departments were slightly higher than the estimated cost of care reflecting good financial management by a small voluntary sector organization. CONCLUSION: Whilst the philosophical arguments around "specialist" care persist, this service fills a gap in intellectual disability care provision.
Subject(s)
Intellectual Disability , Quality of Life , Terminal Care , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND METHOD: This naturalistic study was undertaken in routine settings and compared the clinical effectiveness, costs, treatment preference, attrition and patient satisfaction of Group and Individual CBT. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in depressive and distress symptoms between group and individual CBT at post-treatment and follow-up. Individual CBT was 1.5 times more expensive to provide than Group CBT and the wider costs of other supports were similar between study arms suggesting a cost-effectiveness advantage for Group CBT. Patients preferred individual treatment at baseline but, despite this, there were no between-group differences in attrition or satisfaction. CONCLUSION: A larger RCT study is needed, but running CBT groups for depression could be considered more frequently by clinicians.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/economics , Depressive Disorder/economics , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Psychotherapy, Group/economics , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young AdultABSTRACT
Publicly available costs data for child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient services do not allow links to be made with patients' needs and outcomes. Without this information commissioners may reduce the role of inpatient services on the basis of budgetary impacts alone. This study estimates the support costs before, during and after an inpatient admission and explores the associations between costs, needs and outcomes. A detailed prospective cohort study of eight child and adolescent units was undertaken in which participants were assessed at referral, admission, decision to discharge and 1 year later. Mean admission costs were pound24,120, although the range was wide. Associations were found between costs and patients' global impairment, age and exclusion status. Support costs after admission were similar to pre-admission costs, but there was some evidence to suggest that services were better targeted. Moves in England to develop national tariffs for inpatient psychiatric episodes should be based on the likely cost of the episode of treatment rather than costs per day, and good commissioning requires more information on the predictors of such costs.
