ABSTRACT
Introduction Pneumonia continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children younger than five years. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends intravenous antibiotics for five days for severe pneumonia. However, the optimum duration of parenteral antibiotic therapy for pneumonia is not practicable and feasible in poor and resource-constrained settings like India. Given the current Indian scenario wherein childhood pneumonia is extremely prevalent, we attempted to undertake this study to compare the duration of antibiotic therapy in severe cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods A prospective observational study was carried out on 225 cases of severe and very severe CAP patients at a tertiary care center. The study group included children between two months to five years of age. The participants were subjected to antibiotic therapy (parenteral) plus supportive care. The selection of antibiotics was empirical and according to the WHO acute respiratory infection control program. Hematological parameters including blood hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and total leukocyte count, and radiological evaluation were performed on all the participants. Cases were followed up for the duration of clinical response. Results Out of the 225 cases, 25 patients did not respond to antibiotics and were categorized as the treatment failure group. Of the remaining 200 cases, 104 (52%) showed clinical response within three days (3.0±0.016), and 96 showed a response in four to seven days (4.4±0.064). The mean duration of antibiotic therapy among short-course versus long-course treatment was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The majority of patients developed leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and elevated ESR. Conclusion Short-course parenteral antibiotics therapy was equally effective as long-course therapy in severe pneumonia. However, very severe pneumonia patients required a longer course of parenteral antibiotics therapy. Very severe pneumonia was significantly associated with high mortality and treatment failure.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Following an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic coronavirus disease (COVID-19), otherwise healthy children may develop serious manifestations in the form of cardiac, neurological, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and dermatologic dysfunction. Many such cases were being observed in Odisha, an eastern state of India, and have been reported from different health-care facilities. We related these unexplained serious manifestations to multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19 (MIS-C) and planned this study. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was carried out at the following three tertiary care centers: Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar; MKCG Medical College, Berhampur; and Jagannath Hospital, Bhubaneswar. The study population included all children aged from 1 month to 18 years admitted to the hospitals with MIS-C according to the WHO diagnostic criteria. All the data were analyzed by SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 21 children were included in our study. Majority of the cases were male (76.2%), and the predominant age group was 6-10 years (47.6%). Common symptoms and signs in our observation included fever, pain abdomen, seizure, and hypotension. Most of these cases were positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus antibody (80.95%). Response to immunotherapy was dramatic. Mortality (9%) of our study was higher than 1.8%-3% from that of Western literature. None of our patients had coronary abnormality, while two patients had mild cardiac dysfunction at discharge comparable to that of other studies. CONCLUSION: MIS-C following exposure to COVID-19 infection in children is a clinical syndrome, which needs early suspicion and appropriate intervention to prevent mortality.
ABSTRACT
The study was planned to assess and compare the immune response and safety of an indigenous DTPwHB-Hib pentavalent liquid combination vaccine (Shan 5) with Easyfive and TritanrixHB+ Hiberix, the two available pentavalent combination vaccines. Four hundred infants were randomized to receive three doses of either Shan 5 or one of the two comparators. Antibody analysis was performed prior to and four to six weeks post third vaccine dose. Solicited local and systemic events upto three days and unsolicited adverse events in the 30 days follow up period after each dose were recorded. A total of 365 subjects completed the study. Four to six weeks after third dose, 98.32% of the subjects in Shan 5 group had seroprotective Anti PRP-T IgG antibody concentrations (> or =0.15 microg/mL) as compared to 100% and 98.94% subjects in TritanrixHB + Hiberix and Easyfive groups respectively. Seroprotective levels for Anti-HBs (> or =10 mIU/mL) were observed in 97.77%, 97.83% and 98.94% subjects in Shan 5, TritanrixHB + Hiberix and Easyfive groups respectively. Comparable immune responses were observed for the three other components (D, T and P) in all the groups. Four Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were reported (three with Shan 5 and one with Easyfive), all unrelated to the respective vaccines. Most commonly reported adverse events in all the groups were pain at injection site, mild fever (<103 degrees F) and minor swelling at injection site. The study proved that Shan 5 was safe and immunogenic compared to the two other licensed vaccines.
