Polymyxin B in Combination with Antimicrobials Lacking In Vitro Activity versus Polymyxin B in Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

There is no clinical evidence supporting the use of polymyxin B in combination with another antimicrobial for infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii or Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. We developed a cohort study of patients in two intensive care units from teaching hospitals to evaluate treatment with intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 h for severe A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa infections. Covariates potentially associated with 30-day mortality were evaluated in a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 101 patients were included; 33 (32.7%) were treated with polymyxin B in combination with an antimicrobial lacking in vitro activity and 68 (67.3%) with polymyxin B in monotherapy. The overall 30-day mortality was 59.4% (60 patients), comprising 42.4% (14 of 33) and 67.6% (46 of 68) in combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.03). The mortality rates were 18.5/1,000 patient days and 36.4/1,000 patient days in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Combination therapy was independently associated with lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.64; P = 0.001). Creatinine clearance of ≥60 ml/min was also a protective factor, while a higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score and polymicrobial infection were associated with increased mortality. The results did not change after adding a propensity score for prescribing combination therapy into the model. The protective effect remained when only combination with ß-lactam or carbapenem was considered and in both subgroups of patients: those with A. baumannii infection and those with lower respiratory tract infections. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study to show a benefit of combination over monotherapy with polymyxin B for severe extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii or P. aeruginosa infections.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with polymyxin B and influence of AKI on mortality: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients treated with polymyxin B, a last resort antibiotic against Gram-negative bacteria, with a focus on dose, and to determine the impact of AKI on mortality of these patients. METHODS: A multicentre prospective cohort study was performed including patients ≥18 years treated with intravenous polymyxin B for ≥48 h. The primary outcome was AKI defined by RIFLE criteria. Secondary outcomes were 30 day mortality and failure stage of AKI. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model was performed. The probability of developing AKI was determined in a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Four-hundred-and-ten patients were included. AKI occurred in 189 (46.1%) patients. Polymyxin B dose ≥150 mg/day was a risk factor for AKI: adjusted HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.31-2.89, P = 0.01. Higher weight and age were also independently associated with AKI. The probability of developing AKI significantly increased with doses between 150 and 199 mg/day, regardless of patient weight, with no significant increase with higher doses. Higher weight also increased the risk in patients receiving the same daily doses. AKI was barely associated with increased risk for 30 day mortality (adjusted HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.99-1.85, P = 0.06), while ≥150 mg/day did not increase this risk despite its association with AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Polymyxin B total dose is highly related to the risk of AKI, regardless of patient weight. Thirty-day mortality tended to be higher in patients who developed AKI. The relationship between dose, AKI and mortality must be further investigated in studies specifically designed to evaluate this latter outcome.

Effect of cefepime dose on mortality of patients with Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: There are controversies regarding the association of cefepime therapy with increased mortality among patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We evaluated the effect of cefepime on the mortality of patients with GNB bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients with creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL who received empirical therapy with cefepime for at least 48 h for BSIs caused by GNB. The outcome was hospital mortality. Potential clinical predictors, including a high-dose regimen (2 g every 8 h), were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Most (78.8%) isolates had low cefepime MICs (≤0.25 mg/L). The overall hospital mortality was 35.4% [25.6% (10/39) and 40.5% (30/74) in patients receiving high-dose and usual-dose cefepime, respectively (P = 0.17)]. In a Cox regression model adjusted for cefepime MIC and propensity score, a high-dose regimen was independently associated with lower mortality rates [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.91; P = 0.029] while presentation with severe sepsis or septic shock was independently associated with higher mortality rates (aHR 4.10; 95% CI 1.78-9.40; P = 0.001). A trend to lower mortality rates was also found in the subgroup analysis of patients who had not switched antibiotic during therapy after adjustment for the latter variables. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose cefepime therapy was associated with lower mortality rates in patients with GNB BSIs, even for GNB with low cefepime MICs.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients: implications for selection of dosage regimens.

BACKGROUND: Polymyxin B is a last-line therapy for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. There is a dearth of pharmacokinetic data to guide dosing in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty-four critically ill patients were enrolled and blood/urine samples were collected over a dosing interval at steady state. Polymyxin B concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients aged 21-87 years received intravenous polymyxin B (0.45-3.38 mg/kg/day). Two patients were on continuous hemodialysis, and creatinine clearance in the other patients was 10-143 mL/min. Even with very diverse demographics, the total body clearance of polymyxin B when scaled by total body weight (population mean, 0.0276 L/hour/kg) showed remarkably low interindividual variability (32.4% coefficient of variation). Polymyxin B was predominantly nonrenally cleared with median urinary recovery of 4.04%. Polymyxin B total body clearance did not show any relationship with creatinine clearance (r(2) = 0.008), APACHE II score, or age. Median unbound fraction in plasma was 0.42. Monte Carlo simulations revealed the importance of initiating therapeutic regimens with a loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that doses of intravenous polymyxin B are best scaled by total body weight. Importantly, dosage selection of this drug should not be based on renal function.

Pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B in patients on continuous venovenous haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of polymyxin B in patients on continuous venovenous haemodialysis (CVVHD) after intravenous administration of unadjusted dosage regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two critically ill patients had eight blood samples collected during a 12 h interval on days 8 and 10 of polymyxin B therapy. Dialysate was collected every hour during the 12 h dosing interval. Polymyxin B binding in plasma was determined by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Concentrations of polymyxin B in plasma and dialysate samples were quantified using a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. RESULTS: Respective maximum plasma concentrations in patients 1 and 2 were 8.62 and 4.38 mg/L; total body clearances (scaled linearly by body weight) were 0.043 and 0.027 L/h/kg, respectively, of which 12.2% and 5.62% were dialysis clearance, respectively. The corresponding volumes of distribution of polymyxin B at steady state were 0.50 and 0.34 L/kg, respectively, and protein binding in pooled plasma samples was 74.1% and 48.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the recommended polymyxin B doses should not be reduced for patients on CVVHD.