Anesthetic cardioprotection in clinical practice from proof-of-concept to clinical applications.

In 2007, the American Heart Association (AHA) recommended (class IIa, level of evidence B) in their guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery volatile anesthetics as first choice for general anesthesia in hemodynamically stable patients at risk for myocardial ischemia. This recommendation was based on results from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and thus subject to criticism. However, since a "good anesthetic" often resembles a piece of art in the complex perioperative environment, and is difficult to highly standardize, it seems unlikely that large-scale randomized control trials in noncardiac surgical patients will be performed in the near future to tackle this question. There is growing evidence that ether-derived volatile anesthetics and opioids provide cardioprotection in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Since 2011, the American College of Cardiology Foundation/AHA have recommended a "volatile-based anesthesia" for these procedures (class IIa, level of evidence A). It is very likely that volatile anesthetics and opioids also protect hearts of noncardiac surgical patients. However, age, diabetes and myocardial remodeling diminish the cardioprotective benefits of anesthetics. In patients at risk for perioperative cardiovascular complications, it is essential to abandon the use of "anti-conditioning" drugs (sulfonylureas and COX-2 inhibitors) and probably glitazones. There is significant interference in cardioprotection between sevoflurane and propofol, which should not be used concomitantly during anesthesia if possible. Any type of ischemic "conditioning" appears to exhibit markedly reduced protection or completely loses protection in the presence of volatile anesthetics and/or opioids.

Effect of prophylactic bisoprolol plus magnesium on the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Bisoprolol, a highly cardioselective beta(1)-blocker, is widely used to treat elderly patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease and heart failure. The current literature lacks evidence regarding its potency to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) following cardiac surgery. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of bisoprolol plus magnesium (Mg) in the prophylaxis of AF after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients subjected to elective on-pump CABG (84 men, age 65 +/- 8 [SD] years), with no prior AF history, were randomly assigned to the prophylaxis group (n = 50) receiving after surgery bisoprolol (5 mg/day) plus Mg (intravenous infusion of 2 g of Mg on arrival in the intensive care unit, followed by oral Mg at 1800 mg/day for 1 week), or to the control group (n = 50), receiving no combined study medication but remaining on their preoperative drugs, including beta-blockers. All patients were continuously monitored to identify the onset of AF. RESULTS: In the prophylaxis group the incidence of postoperative AF was significantly lower, with 20% (10 / 50) compared to 42% (21 / 50) among controls (p = 0.030, 95% confidence interval [CI] for absolute risk reduction [ARR], 2-42%). Particularly in the elderly, bisoprolol plus Mg was effective in preventing AF; in the prophylaxis group only six of 36 (17%) patients > or = 65 years of age developed AF, compared to 13 of 20 (65%) in the control group (p < 0.001, 95% CI for ARR, 17-65%). This was associated with significantly (p = 0.022) shorter hospital stays in the prophylaxis group (median of 7 vs. 9 days, 95% CI for difference in medians, 0-3 days). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bisoprolol plus Mg effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative AF following on-pump CABG, particularly in elderly patients, and is associated with a shorter hospital length of stay.