Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Hered ; 74(1): 36-44, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23154503

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Custom genotyping of markers in families with familial idiopathic scoliosis were used to fine-map candidate regions on chromosomes 9 and 16 in order to identify candidate genes that contribute to this disorder and prioritize them for next-generation sequence analysis. METHODS: Candidate regions on 9q and 16p-16q, previously identified as linked to familial idiopathic scoliosis in a study of 202 families, were genotyped with a high-density map of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Tests of linkage for fine-mapping and intra-familial tests of association, including tiled regression, were performed on scoliosis as both a qualitative and quantitative trait. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Nominally significant linkage results were found for markers in both candidate regions. Results from intra-familial tests of association and tiled regression corroborated the linkage findings and identified possible candidate genes suitable for follow-up with next-generation sequencing in these same families. Candidate genes that met our prioritization criteria included FAM129B and CERCAM on chromosome 9 and SYT1, GNAO1, and CDH3 on chromosome 16.


Subject(s)
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 9/genetics , Genetic Linkage , Scoliosis/genetics , Adult , Chromosome Mapping/methods , Female , Genetic Heterogeneity , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
2.
BMC Proc ; 5 Suppl 9: S83, 2011 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22373393

ABSTRACT

Family-based study designs are again becoming popular as new next-generation sequencing technologies make whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing projects economically and temporally feasible. Here we evaluate the statistical properties of linkage analyses and family-based tests of association for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 mini-exome sequence data. Based on our results, the linkage methods using relative pairs or nuclear families had low power, with the best results coming from variance components linkage analysis in nuclear families and Elston-Stewart model-based linkage analysis in extended pedigrees. For family-based tests of association, both ASSOC and ROMP performed well for genes with large effects, but ROMP had the advantage of not requiring parental genotypes in the analysis. For the linkage analyses we conclude that genome-wide significance levels appear to control type I error well but that "suggestive" significance levels do not. Methods that make use of the extended pedigrees are well powered to detect major loci segregating in the families even when there is substantial genetic heterogeneity and the trait is mainly polygenic. However, large numbers of such pedigrees will be necessary to detect all major loci. The family-based tests of association found the same major loci as the linkage analyses and detected low-frequency loci with moderate effect sizes, but control of type I error was not as stringent.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL