Gender Differences in Adults With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: Gender differences in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been demonstrated in many studies over the last 15 years. The purpose of this scoping review is to investigate the current knowledge on gender differences in CRS and to analyze the gaps in the literature. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed. REVIEW METHODS: This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Studies that evaluated gender differences in CRS were included in the review. RESULTS: Of the 523 abstracts reviewed, a total of 23 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Articles consisted of retrospective and prospective cohort studies. They were divided into 3 categories based on whether they evaluated gender differences in (1) presentation and baseline quality of life, (2) pathophysiology, and/or (3) outcomes of treatment. Eleven studies addressed differences in presentation, 5 addressed differences in pathophysiology, and 10 dealt with differences in outcomes after surgical or medical management. Most of the studies showed worse baseline QoL secondary to CRS in women, with outcome of treatment being similar in both genders. CONCLUSION: The experience of CRS appears to vary between genders, with women experiencing a greater subjective burden of disease than men, though with similar outcomes after treatment. Further research is indicated, particularly involving the pathophysiology of CRS, to fully understand the underlying causes of these discrepancies.

Gender Differences in Quality of Life of Adolescent Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the differences in the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between female and male adolescent patients at presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional study. METHODS: Adolescent patients, age 12 to 18 years old, presenting to our Otolaryngology clinic between August 2020 and April 2023 for CRS were asked to fill both the SNOT-22 and the SN5 forms. Female and male cohorts were compared regarding their demographics, comorbidities, subjective and objective disease measurements, and choice of treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, 30 female and 36 male patients. There were no differences in age, allergic rhinitis, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, presence of nasal septal deviation, and objective disease severity (P > .05 for all). At presentation, mean overall SNOT-22, ear/facial, sleep, and psychological domains were all higher in female patients (43vs 30.9, P = .02; 9.1vs 6, P = .03; 11.8vs 8.3, P = .07; 14.1vs 8.8, P = .02 respectively). SN5 scores and overall QoL visual analog scale were similar in females and males. CONCLUSION: Female patients with CRS show higher subjective disease burden. Incorporating data on gender-specific differences may be important to personalize treatment decision making.

Risk Factors associated with Recurrent Acute Rhinosinusitis.

KEY POINTS: Few studies have evaluated the association of recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) with other comorbidities. Allergic rhinitis, asthma, primary antibody deficiency, and autoimmune disorders are associated with RARS. Evaluation for these comorbidities should be considered when treating patients with RARS.

Using the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) to study outcome of treatment of nasal obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) as an outcome measure for nasal obstruction, and to determine if it correlates with the nasal obstruction and septoplasty effectiveness (NOSE) scale. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: All patients presenting to our otolaryngology clinic for nasal obstruction secondary to nasal septal deviation and/or inferior turbinate hypertrophy between August 2020 and June 2022 were asked to fill both the SNOT-22 and the NOSE questionnaires. Demographics and comorbidities were reviewed. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) were excluded. SNOT-22 total and subdomain scores were then compared to NOSE scores. RESULTS: 126 patients completed both surveys. Average age was 42.6 years (range 13.8-78.3 years), and 40.5 % were female. 35 patients had septoplasty and inferior turbinoplasty (IT), 34 had functional septorhinoplasty and IT, 6 patients had IT, 7 had nasal septal perforation repair and 44 patients had medical treatment. Overall, SNOT-22 and NOSE scores correlated well preoperatively and postoperatively (r = 0.54, p < 0.0001; r = 0.68, p < 0.0001 respectively). The rhinologic and sleep SNOT-22 subdomains scores had the strongest correlation to NOSE score (r = 0.56, p < 0.0001; r = 0.64, p < 0.0001 respectively). Both NOSE and SNOT-22 scores showed improvement postoperatively [NOSE: 67.4 vs 25.1 (p < 0.0001) at 3 months, 69.5 vs 34 (p < 0.0001) at 6 months; SNOT-22: 37.1 vs 25.2 (p = 0.002) at 3 months, 38.1 vs 22.6 (p = 0.002) at 6 months]. No significant improvement in NOSE or SNOT scores was seen in the medical treatment group. CONCLUSION: SNOT-22 instrument can be used to study the outcome of treatment for nasal obstruction secondary to nasal septal deviation and/or inferior turbinate hypertrophy.

Cochlear Implant Salvage in Case of Grounding Wire Extrusion.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a safe and effective procedure for hearing rehabilitation, with few major complications. Device exposure or extrusion is a rare but major complication that often necessitates explantation due to wound dehiscence or infection. The objective of this report is to present a previously undescribed case in which the cochlear implant grounding wire extruded in 16-month-old patient 3 months post-operatively in the absence of trauma or infection. METHODS: We reviewed the case report and the pertinent literature. RESULTS: A 16-month old male suffered extrusion of his left cochlear implant grounding wire without known etiology 86 days post-operatively after bilateral cochlear implantation. The patient was taken for surgery, and the electrode was reimplanted without complication followed by 48 hours of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics. Nine month follow up revealed the implant functioning appropriately, with no further major complications encountered. CONCLUSION: We present this unique case to demonstrate that a cochlear implant grounding wire extrusion is not necessarily an indication for explantation in the absence of infection.

Botulinum toxin A for the treatment of first bite syndrome-a systematic review.

Background: First bite syndrome (FBS) is a rare post-surgical complication resulting in peri-parotid pain after the first bite of meals. Intra-parotid Botulinum toxin A may offer relief for these symptoms. There is no consensus on the optimal dosage, timing to symptom improvement, need for repeat injections, and safety of this treatment. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-parotid Botulinum toxin A injection in treating FBS. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar were searched from the inception until July 2020. Case reports, case series, prospective and retrospective trials in which patients with post-surgical FBS were treated with intra-parotid botulinum toxin A injection were included. The primary outcome was improvement of FBS symptoms. Secondary outcomes were time to symptom improvement and complications. Risk of bias was assessed with National Institute of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools. Results: Search results yielded 41 studies. Thirty-three articles were excluded after screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, yielding eight studies, from which 22 patients were included. No studies included a control. All studies were of lower quality and had at least moderate risk of bias. The initial botulinum toxin A injection dose ranged from 10-75 U. Time from surgical treatment to injection ranged from 1 month to 3 years. Seven studies, containing 17 patients, reported individual patient outcomes. Clinical improvement was reported in 16 patients lasting between 1-30 months post injection. Eight of 8 (100%) patients receiving at least 40 U botulinum toxin A had symptom improvement. Ten of 22 (45.5%) patients received a second botulinum toxin A injection due to return of pain at a mean of 3.8 months after the first injection. Seven of 22 (38.1%) patients had complete symptom resolution at a mean of 12.1 months. There were no reported injection complications, including: facial paralysis, infection, injection site reaction, and allergic reaction. Discussion: There are no controlled studies comparing intra-parotid botulinum toxin A to observation for FBS. However, botulinum toxin A appears to be a potentially safe, effective treatment.

Outcome of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Adults With Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of immunoglobulin (IG) replacement therapy in adults with rhinosinusitis and primary humoral immunodeficiency disorders (PID). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult (18 years and older) patients who were diagnosed with PID and had the diagnosis of recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and who are on IG replacement therapy. Demographic data, associated conditions, and duration of treatment were reviewed. Number of yearly sinus infections, sinus CT Lund-Mackay (LM) score, and need for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) were reviewed before and after starting IG therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included. Average age was 52 years (18-79 years). About 74% were female. Thirty patients (51.7%) had common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), 18 (31.1%) had hypogammaglobulinemia, and 10 (17.2%) had specific antibody deficiency (SAD). About 79% of patients had allergic rhinitis and 74% had asthma. Pretreatment LM score was 7.6 (±2.2, range of 0-24) compared to posttreatment score of 3.5 (±1.3, range of 0-16) (P = .01). Eleven patients (19%) had FESS pretreatment compared to only two patients (3.4%) requiring ESS after starting treatment on IG therapy (P = .004). Prior to starting IG therapy, five patients (8.6%) had more than 10 sinus infections per year, 33 patients (56.9%) had 5 to 10 infections, and 20 patients (34.5%) had 1 to 5 infections per year. After starting on IG, 34 patients (58.6%) had no infections reported anymore (P < .001), and 24 patients (41.4%) had only 1 to 5 infections reported per year CONCLUSION: IG therapy is a promising treatment option for recurrent rhinosinusitis in patients with PID. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:732-736, 2022.