Chest X-rays and Lung Ultrasound Are Not Interchangeable in Intensive Care Practice.

PURPOSE: Data comparing lung ultrasound (LUS) and chest X-rays (CXRs) have increased over the past years. However, there still is a lack of knowledge as to how these modalities compare with one another in the critical care setting, and several factors, including artificial study conditions, limit the generalizability of most published studies. Our study aimed to analyze the performance of LUS in comparison with CXRs in real-world critical care practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study presents new data from the prospective FASP-ICU trial. A total of 209 corresponding datasets of LUS and CXR results from 111 consecutive surgical ICU patients were subanalyzed, and categorial findings were compared. Statistical analysis was performed on the rates of agreement between the different imaging modalities. RESULTS: A total of 1162 lung abnormalities were detected by LUS in ICU patients compared with 1228 detected by CXR, a non-significant difference (p = 0.276; 95% CI -0.886 to 0.254). However, the agreement rates varied between the observed abnormalities: the rate of agreement for the presence of interstitial syndrome ranged from 0 to 15%, consolidation from 0 to 56%, basal atelectasis from 33.9 to 49.34%, pleural effusion from 40.65 to 50%, and compression atelectasis from 14.29 to 19.3%. The rate of agreement was 0% for pneumothorax and 20.95% for hypervolemia. CONCLUSIONS: LUS does not detect more lung abnormalities in real-world critical care practice than CXRs, although a higher sensitivity of LUS has been reported in previous studies. Overall, low agreement rates between LUS and CXRs suggest that these diagnostic techniques are not equivalent but instead are complementary and should be used alongside each other.

Holter-electrocardiogram-monitoring in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (Find-AFRANDOMISED): an open-label randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a major risk factor for recurrent ischaemic stroke, but often remains undiagnosed in patients who have had an acute ischaemic stroke. Enhanced and prolonged Holter-electrocardiogram-monitoring might increase detection of atrial fibrillation. We therefore investigated whether enhanced and prolonged rhythm monitoring was better for detection of atrial fibrillation than standard care procedures in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: Find-AFrandomised is an open-label randomised study done at four centres in Germany. We recruited patients with acute ischaemic stroke (symptoms for 7 days or less) aged 60 years or older presenting with sinus rhythm and without history of atrial fibrillation. Patients were included irrespective of the suspected cause of stroke, unless they had a severe ipsilateral carotid or intracranial artery stenosis, which were the exclusion criteria. We used a computer-generated allocation sequence to randomly assign patients in a 1:1 ratio with permuted block sizes of 2, 4, 6, and 8, stratified by centre, to enhanced and prolonged monitoring (ie, 10-day Holter-electrocardiogram [ECG]-monitoring at baseline, and at 3 months and 6 months of follow-up) or standard care procedures (ie, at least 24 h of rhythm monitoring). Participants and study physicians were not masked to group assignment, but the expert committees that adjudicated endpoints were. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (30 sec or longer) within 6 months after randomisation and before stroke recurrence. Because Holter ECG is a widely used procedure and not known to harm patients, we chose not to assess safety in detail. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01855035. FINDINGS: Between May 8, 2013, and Aug 31, 2014, we recruited 398 patients. 200 patients were randomly assigned to the enhanced and prolonged monitoring group and 198 to the standard care group. After 6 months, we detected atrial fibrillation in 14% of 200 patients in the enhanced and prolonged monitoring group (27 patients) versus 5% in the control group (nine of 198 patients, absolute difference 9·0%; 95% CI 3·4-14·5, p=0·002; number needed to screen 11). INTERPRETATION: Enhanced and prolonged monitoring initiated early in patients with acute ischaemic stroke aged 60 years or older was better than standard care for the detection of atrial fibrillation. These findings support the consideration of all patients aged 60 years or older with stroke for prolonged monitoring if the detection of atrial fibrillation would result in a change in medical management (eg, initiation of anticoagulation). FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome after aspiration of lamp oil in a fire-eater: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Fire-eater's pneumonia is an exogenous chemical pneumonitis after accidental aspiration of hydrocarbon fluids during the act of fire-eating. There have been few case reports in the literature regarding complications after fire-eating but so far none, to the best of our knowledge, have described such drastic and life-threatening pulmonary complications as in this case while only having swallowed a small amount of fluid. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of fire-eater's pneumonia in a 28-year-old white man with severe pulmonary complications. He presented with pneumonitis and partial respiratory insufficiency. He was diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome and was treated with antibiosis, oxygen therapy, and required non-invasive ventilation. He had a good recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Accidental aspiration of even small amounts of lamp oil can lead to serious life-threatening pulmonary complications. Although fire-eaters are a comparatively small occupational group, the severity of possible complications illustrates that awareness of these consequences should be raised in teenagers and young adults who might be tempted into trying it. This case in a Western country shows that the dangers of fire-eating are not to be underestimated and are not limited to Eastern European countries where the majority of cases have been reported.