Recruitment and retention of American Indian youth and caregivers in a culturally adapted prevention program.

This article seeks to understand to what extent cultural engagement and substance use risk factors influence families' decisions to participate, and ultimately complete, a culturally grounded substance use prevention program. Using data from a 14-week culturally oriented family-based substance use prevention program, we examine predictors of successful recruitment and retention of American Indian youth and their caregivers. Guided by the theoretical model for developing culturally specific preventions, the community-based approach to recruitment resulted in 85.6% of eligible families from two American Indian communities agreeing to participate in the randomized controlled trial. After completion of baseline surveys, 57.3% of the intervention selected families initiated participation in the program sessions and 67.8% of these families completed participation in the program. We used logistic regression to analyze two different models: one that predicted whether invited families chose to participate and whether participating families attended eight or more sessions. Important predictors of participation in the intervention program included single-caregiver households, youth Indigenous language and cultural identity, youth early substance use initiation, and household substance use exposure. Overall, results from this study highlight the importance of fully engaged community research partnerships for multi-session family-based interventions, while identifying potential challenges to program recruitment and participation.

"In a Religious Celebration"? The Religious Defense of LGBT Rights in U.S. Federal Courts.

This article advances scholarship on the relationship between sexuality, religion, and the law within the United States by analyzing case summaries and court opinions of the federal appellate cases decided between 1990 and 2020 that involve a religion-based claim being used to advance or defend gay and lesbian rights. Contrary to dominant public narratives that position religion uniformly in opposition to progressive sexual values, these cases show how Americans' religious beliefs and practices include diverse sexual identities. We find that the courts' reactions to such cases, however, illustrate the tension within legal discourse and hesitancy for the courts to equate religious and moral values with affirming LGBT identities, people, and rights. Our findings suggest that the courts and litigants define what religion is-and what it is not-by positioning it in relation to sexuality.