The Efficacy of Local Flaps in the Treatment of Traumatic Scalp Defects.

BACKGROUND: Scalp defects represent a therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study is to present our experience with local and regional flaps in the treatment of trauma-induced scalp defects. Furthermore, a comparison with other surgical techniques was performed. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patient records was performed. Only patients who underwent surgery using local flaps between January 2010 and September 2020 due to traumatic scalp defects were included in the study. RESULTS: In all, 10 cases were identified (3 females, 7 males, average age at surgery of 46.5 years [range: 18-82 years]). Six patients underwent surgery due to tissue defects and four due to scar keloids. Three patients experienced minor postoperative complications, one of which required additional surgery. The mean defect size was 35.75 cm2 (range: 4-79 cm2) among the four patients where the defect size could be determined retrospectively. The mean inpatient follow-up was 12.4 days (range: 2-34 days). CONCLUSIONS: Local flaps can be widely used. In carefully selected cases, they have the fewest disadvantages of all surgical techniques. In our experience, large angiosomes of the main scalp arteries allow the treatment of defects larger than 30 cm2 with local flaps. Our experience also suggests that the dimensions of flap length to flap width can exceed a ratio of 2:1 in the scalp.

Donor defects after lymph vessel transplantation and free vascularized lymph node transfer: A comparison and evaluation of complications.

BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphedema after surgical interventions is a progressive, chronic disease that is still not completely curable. Over the past years, a multitude of surgical therapy options have been described. AIM: To summarize the single-center complications in lymph vessel (LVTx) and free vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). METHODS: In total, the patient collective consisted of 87 patients who were undergoing treatment for secondary leg lymphedema during the study period from March 2010 to April 2020. The data collection was performed preoperatively during consultations, as well as three weeks, six months and twelve months after surgical treatment. In the event of complications, more detailed follow-up checks were carried out. In total n = 18 robot-assisted omental lymph node transplantations, n = 33 supraclavicular lymph node transplantations and n = 36 Lymph vessel transplantations were analyzed. An exemplary drawing is shown in Figure 1. A graphical representation of patient selection is shown in Figure 2. Robotic harvest was performed with the Da Vinci Xi Robot Systems (Intuitive Surgical, CA, United States). RESULTS: In total, 11 male and 76 female patients were operated on. The mean age of the patients at study entry was: omental VLNT: 57.45 ± 8.02 years; supraclavicular VLNT: 49.76 ± 4.16 years and LVTx: 49.75 ± 4.95 years. The average observation time postoperative was: omental VLNT: 18 ± 3.48 mo; supraclavicular VLNT: 14.15 ± 4.9 and LVTx: 14.84 ± 4.46 mo. In our omental VLNT, three patients showed a slight abdominal sensation of tension within the first 12 postoperative days. No other donor side morbidities occurred. No intraoperative conversion to open technique was needed. Our supraclavicular VLNT collective showed 10 lift defect morbidities with one necessary surgical intervention. In our LVTx collective, 12 cases of donor side morbidity were registered. In one case, surgical intervention was necessary. CONCLUSION: Concerning donor side morbidity, robot-assisted omental VLNT is clearly superior to supraclavicular lymph node transplantation and LVTx.