Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Toxicol ; 39(6): 577-585, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32794434

ABSTRACT

Permitted daily exposure (PDE) values are used by some toxicologists to support the safety qualification of various types of impurities found in a drug substance (DS) or drug product (DP). Permitted daily exposure values are important tools for the toxicologist, but one must be aware of their limitations to ensure that they are used appropriately and effectively in the risk assessment process. First, a toxicologist must always perform a comprehensive analysis of all available animal and human safety data for an impurity, including identifying any data gaps that may exist. Second, if adequate data are available and there are no genotoxicity concerns, an appropriate well-designed repeat-dose toxicity study in animals should be chosen to calculate the PDE. It is important to note that PDE values qualify general systemic toxicity and not necessarily local toleration end points such as irritation and sensitization that are more concentration than dose dependent. In addition, a PDE value calculated from a general toxicity study in animals may not necessarily qualify for reproductive toxicology end points. Lastly, PDE values should never be thought of as analytical limits for or acceptable levels of an impurity in a DS or DP, as this ignores quality considerations. Using safety information from several chemicals as proxy impurities, this article serves as an educational primer to facilitate a better understanding of the development and use of PDE values in the risk assessment process.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/standards , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Animals , Humans , Risk Assessment
2.
J Appl Toxicol ; 39(9): 1348-1361, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31231834

ABSTRACT

CJ-12,918, a 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor, caused cataracts during a 1-month safety assessment studies in rats whereas the structurally similar ZD-2138 was without effect. For CJ-12,918 analogs, blocking different sites of metabolic liability reduced (CJ-13,454) and eliminated (CJ-13,610) cataract formation in both rats and dogs. Using this chemical series as a test set, models and mechanisms of toxicity were first explored by testing the utility of ex vivo rat lens explant cultures as a safety screen. This model overpredicted the cataractogenic potential of ZD-2138 due to appreciably high lens drug levels and was abandoned in favor of a mechanism-based screen. Perturbations in lens sterol content, from a decline in lathosterol content, preceded cataract formation suggesting CJ-12,918 inhibited lens cholesterol biosynthesis (LCB). A 2-day bioassay in rats using ex vivo LCB assessments showed that the level of LCB inhibition was correlated with incidence of cataract formation in animal studies by these 5-LO inhibitors. Thereafter, this 2-day bioassay was applied to other pharmaceutical programs (neuronal nitric oxide synthase, sorbitol dehydrogenase inhibitor, squalene synthetase inhibitor and stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 inhibitors/D4 antagonists) that demonstrated cataract formation in either rats or dogs. LCB inhibition >40% was associated with a high incidence of cataract formation in both rats and dogs that was species specific. Bioassay sensitivity/specificity were further explored with positive (RGH-6201/ciglitazone/U18666A) and negative (tamoxifen/naphthalene/galactose) mechanistic controls. This body of work over two decades shows that LCB inhibition was a common mechanism of cataract formation by pharmaceutical agents and defined a level of inhibition >40% that was typically associated with causing cataracts in safety assessment studies typically ≥1 month.


Subject(s)
Cataract/chemically induced , Cholesterol/biosynthesis , Cholesterol/toxicity , Enzyme Inhibitors/toxicity , Lens, Crystalline/drug effects , Lens, Crystalline/metabolism , Thiazolidinediones/toxicity , Animals , Animals, Laboratory , Cataract/metabolism , Dogs , Female , Male , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 87: 54-63, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28461231

ABSTRACT

In response to increasing concerns around the potential environmental impact of industrial chemicals, the pharmaceutical industry is seeking alternatives for traditional solvents used during the manufacturing process. Taking into consideration the principles of green chemistry, 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF) is proposed as a suitable replacement for the structurally similar solvent tetrahydrofuran (THF). 2-MeTHF is derived from renewable sources and is more easily recovered thereby facilitating its reuse. However, 2-MeTHF is currently not included in the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Q3C residual solvent guidelines and there is no Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) limit proposed below which there would be negligible safety concerns for patients exposed to it as a residual impurity in a drug product. To enable the calculation of a PDE, a GLP compliant 3-month repeat-dose oral toxicity study in rats with a 1-month recovery period was conducted with doses of 2-MeTHF of 0, 80, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Administration of doses of up to 1000 mg/kg/day was tolerated. Based upon minimal observed effects on the liver at ≥500 mg/kg/day, the NOAEL in this study was considered to be 250 mg/kg/day. Inclusion of this NOAEL, and a safety factor of 250 a PDE of 50 mg/day was derived to support the safe use of 2-MeTHF in the pharmaceutical industry.


Subject(s)
Furans , Solvents , Animals , Drug Industry , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...