Discordant Breast and Axillary Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer has the advantage of determining in vivo response to treatment, enabling more conservative surgery, and facilitating the understanding of tumor biology. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC is a predictor of improved overall survival. However, some patients demonstrate a discordant response to NAC between the breast and axillary nodes. This study was designed to identify factors that correlate to achieving a breast pCR without an axillary node pCR following NAC and explore the potential clinical implications. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with clinical T1-4, N1-3 breast cancer between 2004 and 2017. Patients underwent NAC followed surgical resection of the breast cancer and axillary node surgery. Multivariable analyses were used to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with discordant pathologic response. RESULTS: In total, 13,934 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4292 (30.8%) patients demonstrated a breast pCR without a corresponding axillary pCR on final pathology. After adjusting for covariates, factors associated with higher discordance between axillary response in our cohort of breast pCR patients included older age (≥ 54), treatment at a community facility, T1 tumors, HR-positive, HER2 negative, low-grade tumors, and cN2/3 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between breast and axillary pCR is not infrequent and may be related to a number of patient-related factors and tumor characteristics impacting nodal response to NAC. Further investigation into differing responses to NAC is warranted to better understand the mechanism of this phenomenon and to determine how these findings may influence treatment.

Goals of Care Among Parents of Children Receiving Palliative Care.

Importance: While knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known. Objective: To determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network's Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children's hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services. Exposures: Analyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC. Main Outcomes: Parents' importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100. Results: A total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation. Conclusions and Relevance: Parents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.

Care Intensity and Palliative Care in Chronically Critically Ill Infants.

CONTEXT: Increasingly, chronically critically ill (CCI) infants survive to discharge from Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). Little is known about their care intensity and the primary and specialty palliative care families receive at and following discharge. OBJECTIVES: To describe care intensity and primary and specialty palliative care received by NICU CCI infants at discharge and one year. METHODS: Chart abstraction of CCI infants at three academic centers discharged at ≥42 weeks corrected gestational age with medical technology between 2016 and 2019, including demographics, care intensity, and primary and specialty palliative care received at discharge and one year. RESULTS: Among 273 infants, NICU median stays were 45 [IQR 23-92] days. Primary diagnoses included congenital and/or genetic conditions (68.5%), prematurity (28.2%), and birth events (3.3%). At discharge, surgical feeding tubes (75.1%) and tracheostomies (24.5%) were the most common technologies. Infants received a median of 6 [IQR 4-9] medications and were followed by a median of 8 [IQR 7-9] providers. At one year, 91.4% continued with one or more technologies, similar numbers of medications and specialty providers. In the NICU, nearly all families had social work involvement, 78.8% had chaplaincy and 53.8% child life; 19.8% received specialty palliative care consultation. At one year, only 13.2% were followed by palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: CCI infants receive intensive medical care including multiple medical technologies, medications, and specialty follow up at discharge and remain complex at one year of life. Most receive primary interprofessional palliative care in the NICU, however these infants and their families may have limited access to specialty palliative care in the short- and long-term.

Parent and Adolescent Perspectives on the Impact of COVID on the Care of Seriously Ill Children.

CONTEXT: Few studies have explored the impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) on the care of seriously ill children which may be especially affected due to the child's vulnerability, complexity of care, and high reliance on hospital-based care. OBJECTIVE: To explore parental and adolescent perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on care of seriously children. METHODS: We recruited a convenience sample of families of seriously ill children between September and December 2020. The study involved a semi-structured interview through Zoom followed by an online sociodemographic survey. Interviews were transcribed and coded using the constant comparison method. The sample intended to represent diversity in child age and diagnoses, and family sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Sixty-four families were approached; 29 enrolled (response rate 45%), including 30 parents and three AYAs. Most parents and AYAs identified as white (62%). Some families reported new financial hardships, with 17.2% having difficulty paying bills after March 2020 compared to 6.9% before. Emerging themes from interviews included additional roles parents managed due to cancelled services or shifting to telehealth, increased isolation, high emotional distress due increased in-home demands, uncertainty, and visitor restrictions in medical facilities, and benefits and challenges to telehealth. One positive outcome was the use of a hybrid care model whereby families choose telehealth appointments and in-person services, when necessary. CONCLUSION: Families caring for seriously ill children during COVID-19 face increased challenges. Health systems should consider long-term telehealth/in-person hybrid care models that have potential to improve access to and satisfaction with care.

One Size Doesn't Fit All in Early Pediatric Oncology Bereavement Support.

CONTENT: Parents who experience the death of a child have significantly higher rates of psychological distress compared to non-bereaved parents. The effectiveness of current bereavement supports, and ideal types and timing of future supportive interventions aimed at improving negative sequalae are relatively unknown. OBJECTIVES: This interview-based study explored the early bereavement needs of 15 parents of children who died from cancer, including the bereavement support received, perceived barriers to support, and desired additional supportive interventions. METHODS: Parents who previously participated in a survey-based study examining the early grief experience were invited to partake in a semi-structured interview. Interviews focused on examining bereavement support for parents within the first three years following the child's death and barriers to adequate support; transcribed interviews underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen parents completed the interview; 14 parents (93%) were White and non-Hispanic, five were male. Parents participated on average 19 months (range 12-34) following their child's death. Parents identified numerous supports that were and were not helpful. Augmented informative materials, professional, organized, and religious/spiritual support, and connections with others were identified as key elements in a supportive intervention. CONCLUSION: Bereaved parents identified many supportive needs, most of which already exist at the community and institution level. Suggestions outlined by parents may provide a useful framework for developing novel supportive interventions and ways to tailor strategies to support bereaved parents. Researchers must continue to seek feedback from bereaved parents and families about their met and unmet needs and use this information to design early supportive bereavement interventions.

Decision aids in anesthesia: do they help?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient decision aids are educational tools used to assist patients and clinicians in healthcare decisions. As healthcare moves toward patient-centered care, these tools can provide support to anesthesiologists by facilitating shared decision-making. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has shown that patient decision aids are beneficial in the clinical setting for patients and physicians. Studies have shown that patients feel better informed, have better knowledge, and have less anxiety, depression, and decisional conflict after using patient decision aids. In addition, a structured approach for the development of patient decision aids in the field of anesthesia has been established. SUMMARY: Patient decision aids can support patient-centered care delivery and shared decision-making, especially in the field of anesthesia. Current research involves implementing the use of patient decision aids in the discussion for monitored anesthesia care. Further development of quality metrics is needed to improve the decision aids and maximize decision quality.