Situación actual de la cirugía toracoscópica del raquis torácico y lumbar. Parte 2: Tratamiento de la hernia de disco torácica, de las deformidades, de la patología tumoral e infecciosa, y miscelánea / Current status of thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine. Part 2: Treatment of the thoracic disc hernia, spinal deformities, spinal tumors, infections and miscellaneous

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía toracoscópica o torácica videoasistida (VATS) de la región torácica y lumbar ha evolucionado desde su aparición hace menos de 20 años y hoy en día puede estar indicada su utilización en una gran cantidad de procesos y lesiones. El objetivo del siguiente trabajo (en sus 2 partes) es hacer una revisión de la situación actual de la VATS de la región torácica y lumbar en todo su espectro. DESARROLLO: Se realiza una revisión de la literatura desarrollándose uno por uno los grandes grupos de indicaciones donde la VATS tiene lugar. En esta segunda parte se realiza la revisión y discusión en el manejo, el tratamiento y la técnica específica mediante toracoscopia de la hernia de disco torácica, de las deformidades raquídeas, de la patología tumoral, de los procesos infecciosos de la columna y del resto de indicaciones posibles para la VATS. CONCLUSIONES: La cirugía toracoscópica es en muchos casos una alternativa a la cirugía abierta convencional. El uso del abordaje transdiafragmático ha hecho posible el tratamiento toracoscópico de gran cantidad de procesos de la unión toracolumbar. Se ha ampliado el abanico de indicación terapéutica, que incluye el tratamiento de deformidades, tumores, infecciones y otros procesos patológicos, así como la reconstrucción de los segmentos raquídeos lesionados y la descompresión del canal raquídeo si la disposición de la lesión es favorable al abordaje anterolateral. Los buenos resultados clínicos de la VATS están avalados por una creciente experiencia plasmada en un elevado número de trabajos. El grado de complicaciones de la cirugía toracoscópica es comparable al de la cirugía abierta, con ventajas respecto a la morbilidad del abordaje y a la recuperación posterior de los pacientes

INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the thoracic and lumbar spine has evolved greatly since it appeared less than 20 years ago. It is currently used in a large number of processes and injuries. The aim of this article, in its two parts, is to review the current status of VATS of the thoracic and lumbar spine in its entire spectrum. DEVELOPMENT: After reviewing the current literature, we developed each of the large groups of indications where VATS takes place, one by one. This second part reviews and discusses the management, treatment and specific thoracoscopic technique in thoracic disc herniation, spinal deformities, tumour pathology, infections of the spine and other possible indications for VATS. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgery is in many cases an alternative to conventional open surgery. The transdiaphragmatic approach has made endoscopic treatment of many thoracolumbar junction processes possible, thus widening the spectrum of therapeutic indications. These include the treatment of spinal deformities, spinal tumours, infections and other pathological processes, as well as the reconstruction of injured spinal segments and decompression of the spinal canal if lesion placement is favourable to antero-lateral approach. Good clinical results of thoracoscopic surgery are supported by growing experience reflected in a large number of articles. The degree of complications in thoracoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery, with benefits in regard to morbidity of the approach and subsequent patient recovery

Situación actual de la cirugía toracoscópica del raquis torácico y lumbar. Parte 1: Aspectos generales y tratamiento de las fracturas / Current status of thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine. Part 1: General aspects and treatment of fractures

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía toracoscópica o torácica videoasistida (VATS) de la región torácica y lumbar ha evolucionado desde su aparición hace menos de 20 años y hoy en día puede estar indicada su utilización en una gran cantidad de procesos y lesiones. El objetivo del siguiente trabajo (en sus 2 partes) es hacer una revisión de la situación actual de la VATS de la región torácica y lumbar en todo su espectro. DESARROLLO: Se realiza una revisión de la literatura desarrollándose uno por uno los grandes grupos de indicaciones donde la VATS tiene lugar. En esta primera parte se realiza una descripción de la técnica quirúrgica general toracoscópica que incluye los requerimientos previos necesarios, el abordaje transdiafragmático, las técnicas utilizadas en la instrumentación y reconstrucción de la columna, y la revisión del tratamiento y de la técnica específica en el manejo de las fracturas raquídeas. CONCLUSIONES: La cirugía toracoscópica es en muchos casos una alternativa a la cirugía abierta convencional. El uso del abordaje transdiafragmático ha hecho posible el tratamiento toracoscópico de gran cantidad de procesos de la unión toracolumbar. Se ha ampliado el abanico de indicación terapéutica, que incluye el tratamiento de fracturas y deformidades así como la reconstrucción de los segmentos raquídeos lesionados y la descompresión del canal raquídeo si la disposición de la lesión es favorable al abordaje anterolateral. Los buenos resultados clínicos de la VATS están avalados por una creciente experiencia plasmada en un elevado número de trabajos. El grado de complicaciones de la cirugía toracoscópica es comparable al de la cirugía abierta, con ventajas respecto a la morbilidad del abordaje y a la recuperación posterior de los pacientes

INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the thoracic and lumbar spine has greatly evolved since it appeared less than 20 years ago. Nowadays, it is indicated in a large number of processes and injuries. The aim of this article, in its 2 parts, is to review the current status of VATS in treatment of the thoracic and lumbar spine in its entire spectrum. DEVELOPMENT: After reviewing the current literature, we develop each of the large groups of indications where VATS is used, one by one. This first part contains a description of general thoracoscopic surgical technique including the necessary prerequisites, transdiaphragmatic approach, techniques and instrumentation used in spine reconstruction, as well as a review of treatment and specific techniques in the management of spinal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgery is in many cases an alternative to conventional open surgery. The transdiaphragmatic approach has made endoscopic treatment of many thoracolumbar junction processes possible, thus widening the spectrum of therapeutic indications. These include the treatment of fractures and deformities, as well as the reconstruction of injured spinal segments and decompression of the spinal canal in any etiological processes if the lesion placement is favourable to antero-lateral approach. Good clinical results of thoracoscopic surgery are supported by the growing experience reflected in a large number of articles. The degree of complications in thoracoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery, with benefits in morbidity of the approach and subsequent patient recovery

[Current status of thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine. Part 2: treatment of the thoracic disc hernia, spinal deformities, spinal tumors, infections and miscellaneous]. / Situación actual de la cirugía toracoscópica del raquis torácico y lumbar. Parte 2: Tratamiento de la hernia de disco torácica, de las deformidades, de la patología tumoral e infecciosa, y miscelánea.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the thoracic and lumbar spine has evolved greatly since it appeared less than 20 years ago. It is currently used in a large number of processes and injuries. The aim of this article, in its two parts, is to review the current status of VATS of the thoracic and lumbar spine in its entire spectrum. DEVELOPMENT: After reviewing the current literature, we developed each of the large groups of indications where VATS takes place, one by one. This second part reviews and discusses the management, treatment and specific thoracoscopic technique in thoracic disc herniation, spinal deformities, tumour pathology, infections of the spine and other possible indications for VATS. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgery is in many cases an alternative to conventional open surgery. The transdiaphragmatic approach has made endoscopic treatment of many thoracolumbar junction processes possible, thus widening the spectrum of therapeutic indications. These include the treatment of spinal deformities, spinal tumours, infections and other pathological processes, as well as the reconstruction of injured spinal segments and decompression of the spinal canal if lesion placement is favourable to antero-lateral approach. Good clinical results of thoracoscopic surgery are supported by growing experience reflected in a large number of articles. The degree of complications in thoracoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery, with benefits in regard to morbidity of the approach and subsequent patient recovery.

[Current status of thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine. Part 1: general aspects and treatment of fractures]. / Situación actual de la cirugía toracoscópica del raquis torácico y lumbar. Parte 1: Aspectos generales y tratamiento de las fracturas.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic surgery or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the thoracic and lumbar spine has greatly evolved since it appeared less than 20 years ago. Nowadays, it is indicated in a large number of processes and injuries. The aim of this article, in its 2 parts, is to review the current status of VATS in treatment of the thoracic and lumbar spine in its entire spectrum. DEVELOPMENT: After reviewing the current literature, we develop each of the large groups of indications where VATS is used, one by one. This first part contains a description of general thoracoscopic surgical technique including the necessary prerequisites, transdiaphragmatic approach, techniques and instrumentation used in spine reconstruction, as well as a review of treatment and specific techniques in the management of spinal fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgery is in many cases an alternative to conventional open surgery. The transdiaphragmatic approach has made endoscopic treatment of many thoracolumbar junction processes possible, thus widening the spectrum of therapeutic indications. These include the treatment of fractures and deformities, as well as the reconstruction of injured spinal segments and decompression of the spinal canal in any etiological processes if the lesion placement is favourable to antero-lateral approach. Good clinical results of thoracoscopic surgery are supported by the growing experience reflected in a large number of articles. The degree of complications in thoracoscopic surgery is comparable to open surgery, with benefits in morbidity of the approach and subsequent patient recovery.

Thoracoscopic assisted en bloc resection of a spine tumor.

Spine tumors are fairly common and the management is through a multimodality approach. Lesions of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae have been treated with such extensive anterior and/or posterior approaches. The authors present a case of a 56-year-old lady with solitary T11 metastases from colonic carcinoma and a case of a 43-year-old lady with T5-T6 high-grade osteogenic sarcoma. The treatment consists of a wide vertebrectomy by posterior approach, after anterior release and sub-pleural dissection using a thoracoscopic approach. A thoracoscopic assisted anterior approach could reduce the duration and the morbidity of a vertebrectomy without affecting oncological management.

[Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer]. / Die Behandlung der dynamischen Spinalkanalstenose mit einem interspinösen Spacer.

OBJECTIVE: Indirect decompression of the spinal canal and the neuroforamina by means of interspinous process distraction and limitation of extension movements. Reduction of forces acting on the posterior joint structures of a functional spinal unit (posterior anulus, facet joints, intervertebral discs). INDICATIONS: Primary indication: Spinal claudication with improvement of the clinical symptomatology upon taking an inclined position. Secondary indication: Low back pain in the presence of accompanying retrolisthesis. Hyperlordosis Facet joint complaints Annulus lesions with high intensity zones (HIZ) M. Baastrup ("kissing spine"). Adjacent segment preservation (e.g. prophylaxis of recurrent disc herniation after discectomy or topping-off following previous fusion). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Spinal instabilities which prohibit a solid fixation of the implant (e.g. spondylolysis, isthmus fractures, condition following previous (hemi-) laminectomy) Degenerative spondylolisthesis ffl 1st degree. Severe structural narrowing of the spinal canal. Absent dynamic aspect without improvement upon inclination, segmental ankylosis. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Positioning of the patient in an inclined position. Approximately 4 cm median skin incision, bilateral access with preservation of the supraspinous ligament. Perforation of the interspinous ligament. Following interspinous distraction the adequate size implant is established. Insertion of the interspinous process distraction device (IPD) unit and fixation of the mobile wing unit from the contralateral side. Medial positioning and solid fixation of the implant by connecting the two implant units. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Lumbar orthosis (optional), otherwise no further support required. Daily living activities immediately after the operation. Physiotherapeutic exercises (optional). Low impact sporting activities from 2nd week after operation, intense/ high impact sporting activities from 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Previous studies have reported satisfactory results for interspinous distraction devices for the treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis. However, the majority of these previously published studies are based on data with only shortterm follow-up or small patient numbers. In particular, the results of interspinous spacers for the treatment of different indications have not been evaluated separately. Complications and long-term results still need to be established.

Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine.

The thoracolumbar junction is the section of the truncal spine most often affected by injuries. Acute instability with structural damage to the anterior load bearing spinal column and post-traumatic deformity represent the most frequent indications for surgery. In the past few years, endoscopic techniques for these indications have partially superseded the open procedures, which are associated with high access morbidity. The particular position of this section of the spine, which lies in the border area between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, makes it necessary in most cases to partially detach the diaphragm endoscopically in order to expose the operation site, and this also provides access to the retroperitoneal section of the thoracolumbar junction. A now standardised operating technique and instruments and implants specially developed for the endoscopic procedure, from angle stable plate and screw implants to endoscopically implantable vertebral body replacements, have gradually opened up the entire spectrum of anterior spine surgery to endoscopic techniques.

Thoracoscopic debridement and stabilization of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis.

The role of surgical debridement and internal fixation in treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis has been evolving. The standard surgical approach to thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis requiring extensive thoracotomy or retroperitoneal exposure carries significant associated morbidity and postoperative pain. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic spine surgery is designed to improve postoperative morbidity associated with the traditional open surgery. We report a case of a 70-year-old man who developed T11-T12 pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis 3 months after undergoing posterior laminectomy and microsurgical excision of a herniated thoracic disc. The patient underwent minimally invasive thoracoscopic radical debridement and anterior spinal reconstruction and fusion. Patients with vertebral osteomyelitis may benefit from the decreased postoperative morbidity that is associated with minimally invasive thoracoscopic spinal surgery.

Video-assisted techniques in the management of thoracolumbar fractures.

The thoracolumbar junction is the most common region of the spine to be affected by injuries. Acute instability with structural damage to the anterior load-bearing spinal column and posttraumatic deformity represent the most frequent indications for surgery. A standardized operating technique with instruments and implants specially developed for the endoscopic procedure, ranging from an angled, stable plate and screw implant to endoscopically implantable vertebral body replacements, have gradually opened up the entire spectrum of anterior spine surgery to endoscopic techniques at the thoracolumbar junction.

Endoscopic treatment of spinal trauma at the thoracolumbar junction.

Attempts of treating unstable fractures of the thoracolumbar junction by posterior reduction and fixation alone often result in a significant loss of correction, especially in lesions where a severe destruction of the vertebral body and the intervertebral disc is present. The conventional open approaches like classic thoraco-phreno-lumbotomy produces additional iatrogenic trauma at the lateral chest and abdominal wall which not rarely leads to intercostal neuralgia, as well as post-thoracotomy syndromes. The endoscopic trans-diaphragmatic approach described below opens up the whole thoracolumbar junction to a minimally invasive procedure allowing one to perform all the procedures needed for a full reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine like corpectomy, decompression, vertebral body replacement and anterior plating. The key to address also the subdiaphragmal and retroperitoneal section of the thoracolumbar junction is a partial detachment of the diaphragm which runs along the attachment at the spine and the ribs. The technique was published first in 1998 and has been used now in 650 endoscopic procedures at the thoracolumbar junction out of a total of more than 1300 thoracoscopic operations of the spine in the BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Germany since 1996.

Internet based multicenter study for thoracolumbar injuries: a new concept and preliminary results.

This article reports about the internet based, second multicenter study (MCS II) of the spine study group (AG WS) of the German trauma association (DGU). It represents a continuation of the first study conducted between the years 1994 and 1996 (MCS I). For the purpose of one common, centralised data capture methodology, a newly developed internet-based data collection system ( http://www.memdoc.org ) of the Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopaedic Surgery of the University of Bern was used. The aim of this first publication on the MCS II was to describe in detail the new method of data collection and the structure of the developed data base system, via internet. The goal of the study was the assessment of the current state of treatment for fresh traumatic injuries of the thoracolumbar spine in the German speaking part of Europe. For that reason, we intended to collect large number of cases and representative, valid information about the radiographic, clinical and subjective treatment outcomes. Thanks to the new study design of MCS II, not only the common surgical treatment concepts, but also the new and constantly broadening spectrum of spine surgery, i.e. vertebro-/kyphoplasty, computer assisted surgery and navigation, minimal-invasive, and endoscopic techniques, documented and evaluated. We present a first statistical overview and preliminary analysis of 18 centers from Germany and Austria that participated in MCS II. A real time data capture at source was made possible by the constant availability of the data collection system via internet access. Following the principle of an application service provider, software, questionnaires and validation routines are located on a central server, which is accessed from the periphery (hospitals) by means of standard Internet browsers. By that, costly and time consuming software installation and maintenance of local data repositories are avoided and, more importantly, cumbersome migration of data into one integrated database becomes obsolete. Finally, this set-up also replaces traditional systems wherein paper questionnaires were mailed to the central study office and entered by hand whereby incomplete or incorrect forms always represent a resource consuming problem and source of error. With the new study concept and the expanded inclusion criteria of MCS II 1, 251 case histories with admission and surgical data were collected. This remarkable number of interventions documented during 24 months represents an increase of 183% compared to the previously conducted MCS I. The concept and technical feasibility of the MEMdoc data collection system was proven, as the participants of the MCS II succeeded in collecting data ever published on the largest series of patients with spinal injuries treated within a 2 year period.

Endoscopic surgery on the thoracolumbar junction of the spine.

The thoracolumbar junction is the section of the truncal spine most often affected by injuries. Acute instability with structural damage to the anterior load-bearing spinal column and post-traumatic deformity represents the most frequent indications for surgery. In the past few years, endoscopic techniques for these indications have partially superseded the open procedures, which are associated with high access morbidity. The particular position of this section of the spine, which lies in the transition area between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, makes it necessary in most cases to partially detach the diaphragm endoscopically in order to expose the surgical site, and this also provides access to the retroperitoneal section of the thoracolumbar junction. A now standardised operating technique, instruments and implants specially developed for the endoscopic procedure, from angle stable plate and screw implants to endoscopically implantable vertebral body replacements, have gradually opened up the entire spectrum of anterior spine surgery to endoscopic techniques.

Transcostovertebral kyphoplasty of the mid and high thoracic spine.

While Kyphoplasty is increasingly becoming a recognised minimally invasive treatment option for osteoporotic vertebral fractures and neoplastic vertebral collapse, the experience in the treatment of vertebrae of the mid (T5-8)- and high (T1-4) thoracic levels is limited. The slender pedicle morphology restricts the transpedicular approach at these levels, necessitating extrapedicular placement techniques. Fifty five vertebrae of 32 consecutive patients were treated with kyphoplasty at levels ranging from T2-T8 for vertebral fractures (27 patients) or osteolytic collapse (5 patients). All procedures were performed through the transcostovertebral approach under fluoroscopic guidance. The radioanatomical landmarks of this minimally invasive approach were consistently identified and strictly adhered to. One fracture required open instrumentation due to posterior column injury in addition to kyphoplasty. Identification of specific radioanatomical landmarks allowed precise tool introduction in all cases without intraspinal or paravertebral malplacement. Average operating time for patients with osteoporotic fractures was 30 min per level (range 13-60 min) and 52 min per level (range 35-95 min) in neoplastic cases. Biopsy yield in patients with known or suspected malignancies was 100%. Epidural cement leakage was detected in one patient with pedicular osteolysis. Perforation of the lateral vertebral cortex during balloon inflation occurred in another patient. Both intraoperative complications were without clinical significance. Kyphoplasty in mid- to -high thoracic levels is possible via the transcostovertebral route under fluoroscopic guidance. Strict adherence to a stepwise protocol of tool introduction following defined radioanatomical landmarks is mandatory for the safe completion of this minimally invasive technique.

Surgical technique and results of endoscopic anterior spinal canal decompression.

OBJECT: Decompression of the spinal canal in the management of thoracolumbar trauma is controversial, but many authors have advocated decompression in patients with severe canal compromise and neurological deficits. Anterior decompression, corpectomy, and fusion have been shown to be more reliable for spinal canal reconstruction than posterior procedures; however, traditional anterior-access procedures, thoracotomy, and thoracoabdominal approaches are associated with significant complications. Endoscopy-guided spinal access avoids causing these morbidities, but it has not been shown to yield equivalent results in spinal canal clearance. This study was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of endoscopic spinal canal decompression and reconstruction quantitatively by using pre- and postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scanning. METHODS: Thirty patients with thoracolumbar canal compromise underwent endoscopic anterior spinal canal decompression, interbody reconstruction, and stabilization for fractures (27 cases), and tumor, infection, and severe degenerative disc disease (one case each). The mean follow-up period was 42 months (range 24 months-6 years). Neurological examinations, Frankel grades, radiological studies, and intraoperative findings were prospectively collected. Spinal canal clearance quantified on pre- and postoperative CT scans improved from 55 to 110%. A total of 25% of patients with complete paraplegia and 65% of those with incomplete neurological deficit improved neurologically. The complication rate was 16.7% and included one reintubation, two pleural effusions, one intercostal neuralgia, and one persistent lesion of the sympathetic chain. CONCLUSIONS: The authors describe the endoscopic technique of anterior spinal canal decompression in the thoracolumbar spine. The morbidities associated with an open procedure were avoided, and excellent spinal canal clearance was accomplished as was associated neurological improvement.

Thoracoscopic spine surgery for decompression and stabilization of the anterolateral thoracolumbar spine.

The anterior thoracolumbar spine can be exposed via a variety of approaches. Historically, open anterolateral or posterolateral approaches have been used to gain access to the anterior thoracolumbar spinal column. Although the exposure is excellent, open approaches are associated with significant pain and respiratory problems, substantial blood loss, poor cosmesis, and prolonged hospitalization. With the increasing use of the endoscope in surgical procedures and recent advances in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, minimally invasive thoracoscopic spine surgery has been developed to decrease the morbidity associated with open thoracotomy. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the surgical technique of a minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach to the anterolateral thoracolumbar spine and to discuss its potential indications and contraindications in patients with diseases involving the anterior thoracic and lumbar regions.

Is a single anterolateral screw-plate fixation sufficient for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction? A biomechanical in vitro investigation.

Controversy exists about the indications, advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques used for anterior interbody fusion of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stabilizing effect of an anterolateral and thoracoscopically implantable screw-plate system. Six human bisegmental spinal units (T12-L2) were used for the biomechanical in vitro testing procedure. Each specimen was tested in three different scenarios: (1) intact spinal segments vs (2) monosegmental (T12/L1) anterolateral fixation (macsTL, Aesculap, Germany) with an interbody bone strut graft from the iliac crest after both partial corpectomy (L1) and discectomy (T12/L1) vs (3) bisegmental anterolateral instrumentation after extended partial corpectomy (L1), and bisegmental discectomy (T12/L1 and L1/L2). Specimens were loaded with an alternating, nondestructive maximum bending moment of +/-7.5 Nm in six directions: flexion/extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Motion analysis was performed by a contact-less three-dimensional optical measuring system. Segmental stiffness of the three different scenarios was evaluated by the relative alteration of the intervertebral angles in the three main anatomical planes. With each stabilization technique, the specimens were more rigid, compared with the intact spine, for flexion/extension (sagittal plane) as well as in left and right lateral bending (frontal plane). In these planes the bisegmental instrumentation compared to the monosegmental case had an even larger stiffening effect on the specimens. In contrast to these findings, axial rotation showed a modest increase of motion after bisegmental instrumentation. To conclude, the immobilization of monosegmental fractures in the thoracolumbar junction can be secured by means of bone grafting and the implant used in this study for all three anatomical planes. After bisegmental anterolateral stabilization a sufficient reduction of the movements was registered for flexion/extension and lateral bending. However, the observed slight increase of the range of motion in the transversal plane may lead to loosening of the implant before union. Therefore, the use of an additional dorsal fixation device should be considered.

Thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach to thoracolumbar junction fractures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior approaches to the thoracocolmbar junction (TLJ) are often required to restore anterior column deficiency after spinal trauma. Conventional open approaches are often associated with significant morbidity, and hence there is a need for a minimally invasive approach to TLJ fractures. PURPOSE: To report the feasibility and effectiveness of the thoracoscopic transdiaphragmatic approach (TTA) in the management of TLJ fractures. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 212 patients undergoing surgery at two institutions by the TTA with neurological outcomes, fusion rates and complications. PATIENT SAMPLE: This is a two-institution study of 212 patients managed by TTA, from Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Marnau, a regional trauma facility located in Murnau, Bavaria, Germany, and from Stanford University, Stanford, California from May 1996 to June 2002. Patient ages ranged from 16 to 75 years (mean, 36 years) and included 158 males and 62 females. OUTCOME MEASURES: The neurological status was assessed by the Frankel Neurological Performance scale pre- and postoperatively. Plain radiographs obtained 1 year postoperatively assessed fusion radiologically. METHODS: All patients underwent spinal decompression, reconstruction and instrumentation by the TTA. Seventy-five patients had anterior instrumentation alone, whereas the remaining 137 had combined anterior and posterior instrumentation. A Z-Plate was used for spinal instrumentation from May 1996 to October 1999 and the MACS-TL system from November 1999 to June 2002. RESULTS: Monosegmental, bisegmental and multisegmental fixations were used in 46%, 48% and 6% of cases, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 6 years (mean, 3.9 years). Surgical durations ranged between 70 minutes and 7 hours (mean, 3.5 hours). Successful bony fusion with maintenance of satisfactory spinal alignment was observed in approximately 90% of our patients. Anterior screw loosening was seen in five cases (2.4%), four involving the Z-Plate system and the other involving the MACS-TL system. Three patients (1.4%) required conversion to an open procedure. Access-related complications, such as pleural effusion, pneumothorax and intercostal neuralgia, were seen in 12 patients (5.7%). Three patients (1.4%) had superficial portal infections. We encountered no diaphragmatic herniations. CONCLUSIONS: TTA provides excellent access to the entire TLJ, permitting satisfactory spinal decompression, reconstruction and instrumentation. Diaphragmatic opening and repair can be accomplished safely and effectively without special endoscopic instrumentation. It also precludes the need for retroperitoneoscopic or open thoracoabdominal approaches and thus avoids the associated significant morbidity.

The role of thoracoscopic spinal surgery in the management of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report, operative technique. OBJECTIVES: Vertebral osteomyelitis is frequently associated with elderly and debilitated patients who have significant medical comorbidities. If surgical debridement is contemplated, an open anterior approach like a thoracotomy can be associated with significant complications in this patient population. Thus, patients with vertebral osteomyelitis who need surgery may benefit from minimal invasive techniques that avoid the complications of more extensive open approaches. We performed thoracoscopic spinal surgery in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis, attempting to reduce the morbidity attributable to standard open thoracotomy surgery. METHODS: The technique and results of minimally invasive thoracoscopic spinal surgery for pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in three patients, including radical debridement and anterior spinal reconstruction, are presented. RESULTS: Radical debridement and anterior spinal reconstruction are feasible via endoscopic approach. Standard thoracotomy or thoracoabdominal approaches associated with high morbidity can be avoided, even for fusion across multiple levels. Conversion to open technique was not necessary in this study. There was no recurrence of infection or loss of reduction during the follow-up period. Operative time and blood loss of endoscopic technique were comparable to open technique. CONCLUSIONS: The cases clearly demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of thoracoscopic spinal surgery in the management of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Debridement, decompression of the spinal canal, interbody fusion, and anterior spinal fixation can be performed via endoscopic approach.

Thoracoscopic-assisted treatment of thoracic and lumbar fractures: a series of 371 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional approaches for the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures require extensive surgical exposure, often leading to significant postoperative pain and morbidity. Thoracoscopic spinal surgery was performed to reduce the morbidity of these approaches while still achieving the primary goals of spinal decompression, reconstruction, and stabilization. METHODS: Between May 1996 and May 2001, 371 patients with fractures of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine (T3-L3) were treated with a thoracoscopically assisted procedure. In the first 197 patients, a conventional open anterior plating system was used. The last 174 patients were treated with the MACS-TL system (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), which was designed specifically for endoscopic placement, thereby significantly reducing operative times. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of the fractures were located at the thoracolumbar junction. In 49% of patients, mobilization of the diaphragm was performed to expose the fracture, with later repair. Both x-ray canal compromise and neural deficit were present in 15% of patients. In 35% of patients, a stand-alone anterior thoracoscopic reconstruction was performed. In 65% of patients, a supplemental posterior pedicle-screw construct was also placed either before or after the anterior construct. A steep learning curve was present, with an average operating time of 300 minutes in the first 50% of cases and an average of 180 minutes with the MACS-TL system. The severe complication rate was low (1.3%), with one case each of aortic injury, splenic contusion, neurological deterioration, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and severe wound infection. Compared with a group of 30 patients treated with open thoracotomy, thoracoscopically treated patients required 42% less narcotics for pain treatment after the operation. CONCLUSION: A complete anterior thoracoscopically assisted reconstruction of thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures can be safely and effectively accomplished, thereby reducing the pain and morbidity associated with conventional thoracotomy and thoracolumbar approaches. Although the learning curve is steep, the functional and cosmetic benefits to the patient warrant the difficult training process.