Systematic review of the influence of enhanced recovery pathways in elective lung resection.

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced-recovery pathways aim to accelerate postoperative recovery and facilitate early hospital discharge. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence regarding the influence of this intervention in patients undergoing lung resection. METHODS: The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Eight bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, BIOSIS, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in adult patients treated within an enhanced-recovery pathway or traditional care. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Six studies fulfilled our selection criteria (1 randomized and 5 nonrandomized studies). All the nonrandomized studies reported shorter length of stay in the intervention group (difference, 1.2-9.1 days), but the randomized study reported no differences. There were no differences between groups in readmissions, overall complications, and mortality rates. Two nonrandomized studies reported reduction in hospital costs in the intervention group. Risk of bias favoring enhanced recovery pathways was high. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of low-quality comparative studies have evaluated the influence of enhanced-recovery pathways in patients undergoing lung resection. Some studies suggest that this intervention may reduce length of stay and hospital costs, but they should be interpreted in light of several methodologic limitations. This review highlights the need for well-designed trials to provide conclusive evidence about the role of enhanced-recovery pathways in this patient population.

An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) for lung resection. This study estimates the impact of an ERP for lobectomy on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions. METHODS: Patients undergoing open lobectomy were identified from an OR database between 2011 and 2013. Beginning September 2012, all patients were managed according to a 4-day multidisciplinary ERP with written daily patient education treatment plans, multimodal analgesia, early diet, structured mobilization and standardized drain management. Pre-pathway (PRE) and post-pathway (POST) patients were compared in terms of duration of stay, complications, and readmissions. RESULTS: We identified 234 patients (PRE, 127; POST, 107). Groups were similar with respect to age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and baseline pulmonary function. Compared with the PRE group, the POST group had decreased duration of stay (median, 6 [interquartile range (IQR), 5-7] vs 7 [6-10] days; P < .05), total complications (40 [37%] vs 64 [50%]; P < .05), urinary tract infections (3 [3%] vs 15 [12%]; P < .05), and chest tube duration (median, 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 5 [4-7] days; P < .05), with no difference in readmissions (7 [7%] vs 6 [5%]; P < .05) or chest tube reinsertion (4 [4%] vs 6 [5%]; P < .05). Decreased duration of stay was driven by patients without complications (median, 5 [IQR, 4-6] vs 6 [5-7] days; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multimodal ERP for lobectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay and complications with no difference in readmissions.

Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical innovations advocated to improve patient recovery are often costly. Economic evaluation requires preference-based measures that reflect the construct of patient recovery. We investigated the responsiveness and construct validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) as a measure of postoperative recovery after planned pulmonary resection for suspected malignant tumors. METHODS: Patients undergoing pulmonary resection completed the EQ-5D questionnaire and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and fatigue at baseline (preoperatively) and at 1 and 3 mo postoperatively. Responsiveness and construct validity (discriminant and convergent) were investigated by testing a priori hypotheses. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were analyzed (45% male, 62 ± 12 y, 29% video-assisted). There was no significant difference between median EQ-5D scores obtained at baseline (0.83 [interquartile range {IQR 0.80-1}]) compared to scores at 1 mo (0.83 [0.80-1], P = 0.86) and 3 mo after surgery (1 [0.83-1]; P = 0.09). At 1 mo after surgery, EQ-5D scores were significantly lower in patients undergoing thoracotomy versus video-assisted surgery (0.82 [IQR 0.77-0.89] versus 1 [0.83-1], P = 0.003), but there were no significant differences between patients ≥ 70-y old versus younger (0.95 [IQR 0.82-1] versus 0.83 [0.77-1], P = 0.09) or between patients with versus without complications (0.82 [IQR 0.79-0.95] versus 0.83 [0.80-1], P = 0.10). There was a low but significant correlation between EQ-5D and VAS scores of pain and fatigue (Rho -0.30 to -0.47, P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence of convergent validity, the EQ-5D was not sensitive to the hypothesized trajectory of postoperative recovery and showed limited discriminant validity. This study suggests that the EQ-5D may not be appropriate to value recovery after lung resection.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children.

PURPOSE: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a recognized diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the adult population. Its use in children has been more common in the last years. There are little data on safety and usefulness of that procedure in children. The aim of this study was to review the experience with ERCP in a tertiary university center dedicated to children. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients seen at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) who had undergone an ERCP between September 1990 and July 2007. Data on demographics, diagnosis, anesthesia type, treatments, and complications were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-eight ERCPs were performed on 29 patients. There were 21 girls (72%), and median age at time of procedure was 10.3 years old (range, 3-17 years). Most had only one procedure performed. Two children had 2 interventions, and 1 child with papillary stenosis had 8 interventions linked to stent treatment. The ampulla was cannulated, and the procedure was successfully completed in 97% (37/38) of cases. General anesthesia and sedation were performed in 74% and 26% of procedures, respectively. Indications for ERCP were 29 recurrent or chronic pancreatitis (76%), 8 common bile duct obstructions (21%), and 1 choledochal cyst (3%). Endoscopic treatment was done in 29% of cases. The complication rate was 13.5%, and 4 clinical acute pancreatitis resolved with conservatory treatment. No severe pancreatitis, perforation, or bleeding was noted. Of the patients, 79% had their follow-up at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine for a median length of 43 months (range, 1-53 months). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is used as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in children with a complication rate similar to that seen in adults. The need for general anesthesia is much more frequent with children. When performed by well-trained endoscopists, ERCP is useful and safe in children.