Low Risk for Marginal Ulcers in Duodenal Switch and Gastric Bypass in a Well-Defined Cohort of 472 Patients.

PURPOSE: Marginal ulcer (MU) is well-known complication in bariatric surgery. Several studies are available in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), while data on the incidence in duodenal switch (DS) is limited. We aimed to compare the incidence of MU between DS and RYGBP in a well-defined cohort and to identify associative factors. METHODS: A cohort of 732 patients with BMI ≥ 48 who had undergone primary DS or RYGBP during 2008-2018 received a questionnaire concerning ulcers, PPI therapy, and smoking habits; hereafter, patient charts were reviewed. Incidence rates (IRs) for MU were calculated in our survey and on previous registered data in the national quality register for bariatric surgery (SOReg). A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictive risk factors for MU. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, 472 (64%) patients responded (47 ± 11 years old, 65% women and 42% DS). Of 41 MUs identified, 23 were endoscopically verified. Gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, and dysphagia were the most common symptoms. IR for MU was 1.4% (DS 1.3% and RYGBP 1.5%) per patient-year, compared with 0.9% according to SOReg-data. Persisting PPI treatment was seen in about three quarter of former MU patients (OR 11.2 [3.6-34.7], p < 0.001), but no other associative factors were found. CONCLUSION: The overall risk for MU was low, about 1% per patient-year, without difference between DS and RYGBP. Ongoing PPI treatment was frequent in many former MU patients. This study on MU after DS provides reassuring results for future bariatric surgery candidates.

Changes in bowel habits and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric procedures are increasingly being used, but data on bowel habits are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To assess changes in gastrointestinal function and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS). SETTING: University hospital in Sweden. METHODS: We recruited 268 adult patients (mean age of 42.5 yr, body mass index 44.8, 67.9% female) listed for RYGB and BPD/DS. Patients answered validated questionnaires prospectively concerning bowel function, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey before and after their operation. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 208 patients (78.2% of 266 eligible patients) answered the questionnaires. RYGB patients had fewer bowel motions per week (8 versus 10) and more abdominal pain postoperatively (P<.001). Postoperatively, the 35 BPD/DS patients (69% versus 23%) needed to empty their bowel twice or more than twice daily, reported more flatus and urgency, and increased need for keeping a diet (P<.001). Concerning Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, coping and behavior was slightly reduced while depression and self-perception scores were improved after RYGB. Lifestyle, coping and behavior, and embarrassment were reduced after BPD/DS (P<.05). In the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, physical scores were markedly improved, while mental scores were largely unaffected. CONCLUSION: RYGB resulted in a reduced number of bowel movements but increased problems with abdominal pain. In contrast, BPD/DS-patients reported higher frequency of bowel movements, more troubles with flatus and urgency, and increased need for keeping a diet. These symptoms affected quality of life negatively, however, general quality of life was markedly improved after both procedures. These results will be of great value for preoperative counseling.