Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Niger J Clin Pract ; 22(12): 1758-1764, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31793485

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of the application of three different cavity disinfecting agents to dentin on the micro-shear bond strength (µ-SBS) of one self-etch and two universal adhesive systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 120 caries-free human permanent molar teeth were used in this study. Mid-coronal dentin surfaces were revealed by cutting occlusal enamel and a standard smear layer was obtained by using 600-800-1200 grid silicon carbide abrasive papers. Specimens were randomly assigned to four groups according to the disinfectant used: Group 1: Control (no disinfectant); Group 2: 2% chlorhexidine based (Consepsis); Group 3: 10 ppm ozonated water (TeknO3zone); Group 4: 5% boric acid (Handmade). Each group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, OptiBond XTR, and Tokuyama Universal). Specimens were bonded using either Clearfil SE Bond, OptiBond XTR or Tokuyama Universal, which were employed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Resin composite microcylinders were bonded using Tygon® tubes for µ-SBS testing. After specimens were stored for 24 h, at 37°C in distilled water, µ-SBS test was measured with a universal test machine (LF Plus, Lloyd, Instrument). µ-SBS results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's tests. RESULTS: When the mean microshear bond strength values of the control group were compared, the difference between the subgroups was not significant (P < 0.05). When the mean microshear bond strength values of the chx, ozonated water, and boric acid were compared, the difference between Clearfil SE Bond and Tokuyama Universal was significant (P < 0.05) and the difference between the other groups was not significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ozonated water and boric acid may be as an alternative to other materials used as cavity disinfectants.


Subject(s)
Boric Acids , Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Cements , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Dentin/drug effects , Water , Chlorhexidine , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Enamel , Dental Etching/methods , Humans , Resin Cements/therapeutic use , Smear Layer
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...