Mejora del conocimiento sobre reacciones alérgicas cruzadas en dos grupos de medicamentos: beta-lactámicos y AINEs / Improvement of the knowledge on allergic cross-reactions between two drug groups: beta-lactams and NSAIDS

OBJETIVOS: Identificar oportunidades de mejora, sobre el conocimiento disponible del personal sanitario (en concreto a personal médico, farmacéutico y de enfermería), sobre reacciones alérgicas cruzadas (RAC) de penicilinas y AINEs. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo cuasiexperimental pre-exposición en un hospital de 412 camas. Se realizó una valoración del conocimiento sobre RAC de penicilinas y AINEs, a través de encuestas anónimas, antes (1a encuesta) y después (2a encuesta) de la implantación de una serie de medidas de mejora: protocolo "paciente alérgico a medicamentos", tarjeta de bolsillo, póster resumen de información y charlas divulgativas. Las propias encuestas sirvieron de hoja de recogida de datos y el análisis estadístico se llevó a cabo con el programa SPSS v18.0. RESULTADOS: La media de errores en las las encuestas sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a penicilinas" y sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a AINEs", fue de 20,53 y 27,62, respectivamente. La media de errores en las 2as encuestas sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a penicilinas" y sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a AINEs", fue de 2,27 y 7,26, respectivamente. Todos los resultados se consideraron significativos para un nivel 945;< 0,05. CONCLUSIONES: -No se dispone de un nivel adecuado de conocimiento sobre RAC de penicilinas y AINEs, lo que justifica la realización de un ciclo de mejora. -Tras la implantación de las medidas de mejora se aprecia un aumento en el nivel de conocimiento sobre RAC en penicilinas y AINEs, en los grupos de estudio

OBJECTIVES: To identify opportunities for improving the available knowledge of health care professionals (particularly, physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) on crossed allergic reactions (CAR) to penicillins and NSAIDs. METHOD: Quasi-experimental prospective pre-exposure study at a 412-beds hospital. An assessment of the knowledge on CAR to penicillins and NSAIDs was performed by means of anonymous questionnaires before (1st questionnaire) and after (2d questionnaire) the implementation of a series of improvement measures: protocol of "patient allergic to drugs", pocket card, poster with summarized information, and informative talks. The questionnaires served as the CRF and the statistical analysis was done with the SPSS v18.0 software. RESULTS: The mean number of errors in the first questionnaire on CARs of penicillin allergic patient and on CARs of NSAIDs allergic patients was 20.53 and 27.62, respectively. The mean number of errors in the second questionnaire on CARs of penicillin allergic patient and on CARs of NSAIDs allergic patients was 2.27 and 7.26, respectively. All the results were significant for a p level < 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: -There is insufficient knowledge on CARs to penicillins and NSAIDS, which justifies improvement measures. -After the implementation of improvement measures, there is an increased knowledge on CARs to penicillins and NSAIDs in the study groups

[Improvement of the knowledge on allergic cross-reactions between two drug groups: beta-lactams and NSAIDS]. / Mejora del conocimiento sobre reacciones alérgicas cruzadas en dos grupos de medicamentos: ß-lactámicos y AINEs.

OBJECTIVES: To identify opportunities for improving the available knowledge of health care professionals (particularly, physicians, pharmacists, and nurses) on crossed allergic reactions (CAR) to penicillins and NSAIDs. METHOD: Quasi-experimental prospective pre-exposure study at a 412-beds hospital. An assessment of the knowledge on CAR to penicillins and NSAIDs was performed by means of anonymous questionnaires before (1st questionnaire) and after (2d questionnaire) the implementation of a series of improvement measures: protocol of "patient allergic to drugs", pocket card, poster with summarized information, and informative talks. The questionnaires served as the CRF and the statistical analysis was done with the SPSS v18.0 software. RESULTS: The mean number of errors in the first questionnaire on CARs of penicillin allergic patient and on CARs of NSAIDs allergic patients was 20.53 and 27.62, respectively. The mean number of errors in the second questionnaire on CARs of penicillin allergic patient and on CARs of NSAIDs allergic patients was 2.27 and 7.26, respectively. All the results were significant for a p level < 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: - There is insufficient knowledge on CARs to penicillins and NSAIDS, which justifies improvement measures. - After the implementation of improvement measures, there is an increased knowledge on CARs to penicillins and NSAIDs in the study groups.

Objetivos: Identificar oportunidades de mejora, sobre el conocimiento disponible del personal sanitario (en concreto a personal médico, farmacéutico y de enfermería), sobre reacciones alérgicas cruzadas (RAC) de penicilinas y AINEs. Método: Estudio prospectivo cuasiexperimental pre-exposición en un hospital de 412 camas. Se realizó una valoración del conocimiento sobre RAC de penicilinas y AINEs, a través de encuestas anónimas, antes (1a encuesta) y después (2a encuesta) de la implantación de una serie de medidas de mejora: protocolo "paciente alérgico a medicamentos", tarjeta de bolsillo, póster resumen de información y charlas divulgativas. Las propias encuestas sirvieron de hoja de recogida de datos y el análisis estadístico se llevó a cabo con el programa SPSS v18.0. Resultados: La media de errores en las 1as encuestas sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a penicilinas" y sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a AINEs", fue de 20,53 y 27,62, respectivamente. La media de errores en las 2as encuestas sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a penicilinas" y sobre "RAC en paciente alérgico a AINEs", fue de 2,27 y 7,26, respectivamente. Todos los resultados se consideraron significativos para un nivel 945;< 0,05. Conclusiones: - No se dispone de un nivel adecuado de conocimiento sobre RAC de penicilinas y AINEs, lo que justifica la realización de un ciclo de mejora. - Tras la implantación de las medidas de mejora se aprecia un aumento en el nivel de conocimiento sobre RAC en penicilinas y AINEs, en los grupos de estudio.

Sensitization to Zygophyllum fabago pollen. A clinical and immunologic study.

Zygophyllum fabago is a herbaceous plant found widely in the Mediterranean area. There are no previous reports of its allergenicity. An aerobiologic and clinical survey was conducted in Murcia, southern Spain, to determine the quantity of airborne pollen and establish the possible role of this pollen as a cause of allergic symptoms. With a Hirst volumetric trap, we determined the atmospheric concentrations of this pollen in 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996. Of 1180 patients tested, 181 (15.34%) had a positive skin test. To determine its allergenicity, we divided 47 patients into three groups: in group 1, all the patients had symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis plus asthma; in groups 2 and 3, rhinoconjunctivitis. In group 1, we performed a bronchial provocation test (BPT); in groups 2 and 3, we performed nasal provocation (NPT) and conjunctival provocation (CPT) tests, respectively. SDS-PAGE was used to characterize the antigenic fractions and RAST inhibition to determine cross-reactivity with other pollens. The pollen dispersion period is from May to September (445 grains/m3). BPT was positive in 13 of 15 patients, NPT in 14 of 16 patients, and CPT in 13 of 16 patients. RAST inhibition revealed cross-reactivity with Mercurialis, Ricinus, Olea, and Betula. SDS-PAGE identified 25 IgE antibody-binding components, five of which (60, 65, 41, 38, and 15.5/14.7 kDa) were recognized by 40% of the sera. By SDS-PAGE immunoblotting with sunflower antiprofilin rabbit serum and affinity chromatography we established that the Z. fabago extract has profilin. This study shows that this pollen becomes airborne and elicits an IgE response which triggers respiratory symptoms in allergic subjects.

Management of adverse reactions to prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

BACKGROUND: In hospitals attended by patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, adverse reactions are often observed to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, particularly cutaneous reactions. Given the importance of this drug for prophylaxis we have attempted to establish a desensitization or tolerance protocol so that patients can continue the drug without repeated adverse reactions. METHODS: We studied 34 HIV patients with adverse cutaneous reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, slight to moderate in nature but not life-threatening. Skin tests (prick and intradermal) were done in an attempt to rule out a mechanism of hypersensitivity. Subsequently, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was administered orally in increasing doses beginning with trimethoprim, 0.2 mg, and sulfamethoxazole, 1 mg. The same dose was repeated after 12 hours and then doubled every 24 hours until the therapeutic dose was achieved. If adverse reactions appeared we maintained the last dose administered and administered antihistamines until the reactions cleared or improved. RESULTS: None of the patients had positive skin tests (immediate or delayed). Twenty- seven patients were satisfactorily desensitized. After a follow-up of 3 months, 25 patients were still incident-free on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis, and 19 returning for check-ups at 6 months could still tolerate the drug well. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that patients with adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole can continue prophylactic treatment after oral desensitization.

Asthma in children and ASA intolerance.

Intolerance to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in asthmatics has been widely studied in the adult population, and to a lesser extent in children. In the present study, we present 16 asthmatics between the ages of 2 and 14 suffering from asthma induced by ASA ingestion, and the clinical characteristics are compared with a population of asthmatic children with a negative challenge test. The following results were obtained: 1) in contrast to in adults, females are not predisposed to ASA intolerance in childhood, the male:female ratio being the usual 2:1 in infantile asthma; 2) ASA intolerance can appear at a very early age (in our series the youngest was 1 year old); 3) extrinsic asthmatics are the most commonly affected, and also children with exercise-induced asthma; 4) in extrinsic asthmatics with asthma attacks precipitated by ASA, sinusitis is more frequent than in extrinsic asthmatics with ASA tolerance; 5) polyposis is exceptional; 6) the presence of associated urticaria is frequent, and much greater than in adult ASA-intolerant asthmatics; and 7) the results of the challenge with NSAIDs are similar to those obtained in adult patients, which would indicate a common pathophysiological mechanism related to the capacity of these drugs to inhibit cyclooxygenase activity.

Sulfite-induced urticaria.

Metabisulfite sensitivity is being described with growing frequency. Sulfites are used in food, drinks, and drugs. Adverse reactions to apparently nontoxic doses have been described. Exposure of sensitive persons to sulfites has produced asthma, and occasionally other adverse reactions in nonasthmatic patients. We present a case of urticaria induced by metabisulfites. During the previous 2 years the patient had suffered episodes of urticaria and angioedema limited to the face, neck, upper thorax, and dysphonia without asthma after the ingestion of food and drinks containing sulfites. Oral challenge with 25 mg of potassium metabisulfite elicited urticaria on the face and neck, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, and dysphonia. Prick and intradermal tests were negative. Two further challenges with the same doses were also positive. One of these was controlled with placebo, 30 minutes after oral administration of 400 mg sodium cromolyn; the second was carried out 90 minutes after oral administration of 5000 micrograms cyanocobalamin. We have been unable to identify a pathogenic mechanism.

Short-term treatment of asthma with budesonide versus placebo.

The effects of the topical steroid budesonide on bronchial hyperreactivity were evaluated in a patient group (A, n = 17) and a placebo-controlled patient group (B, n = 11). Group A was given budesonide 400 micrograms/12 h for 4 weeks and 200 micrograms/12 h for four more weeks. The drug proved efficient in controlling asthma clinically and improving the spirometric parameters: FVC (p < 0.05), FEF50 (p < 0.05) and FEV1 (p < 0.01). Bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20) decreased moderately in the treatment group (p < 0.1). On the contrary, basal spirometry and PD20 worsened in the control group. Some patients in group A showed peripheric eosinophilia (2/15) or in secretions (9/15), which persisted in one patient at end of treatment. Budesonide was effective in the clinical and spirometric control of asthma. We conclude that for a better assessment of the treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity with budesonide, the drug must be administered for a longer period of time. The differences between this study and previous ones is that the improvement in PD20 can be explained by the different characteristics of the patients selected for this study.

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitic syndrome, asthma and anaphylactic reaction with ampicillin.

A patient with hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitic syndrome (HUV) is presented. This is an immunological pathology, limited to skin or multisystemic, that requires a differential diagnosis with erythematosus systemic lupus on the same occasions. The ever-present symptom is skin participation, such as urticaria-angioedema or fixed exanthema; biopsy shows necrotizing venulitis with polymorphonuclear infiltration and leukocytoclastic powder. Typical laboratory data are: diminished C3, C4 and C1q; C1 inhibition can be low or normal; the more characteristic finding is the presence of C1q associated immunocomplexes. Leukocytoclastic necrotizing vasculitis was found in the skin biopsy. During the course of illness (three years) the patient presented moderate cutaneous symptoms and asthma, without other systemic participation. During this period, antihistamines and, occasionally, corticoids were administered with improvement. Moreover, the patient presented urticaria related to ampicillin ingestion, and furthermore, the presence of anaphylaxis to beta-lactam was diagnosed in vivo and specific IgE was found in the laboratory study. This feature was previously observed by other authors; however, we cannot determine why the IgE-mediated allergy to beta-lactam and a complement pathology like HUV are related.

Fixed eruption due to erythromycin. A case report.

A case of fixed eruption due to erythromycin is reported. To our knowledge, there have been only two previous descriptions. Cross-sensitivity with other macrolides were not demonstrated.