Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3389-3397, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312728

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stoma reversal surgery can result in considerable morbidity and even mortality. Feasibility of utilizing single-port laparoscopy through the stoma fenestration have been shown before. Aim of the present observational study is to evaluate multicenter experiences of single-port reversal of left-sided colostomy (SPRLC) throughout Europe and to provide an overview of available literature on this topic. METHODS: All patients undergoing SPRLC in four different teaching hospitals throughout Europe are included. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes were postoperative length of stay (LOS), single-port success rate and conversion rates. Appraisal of the available literature in PubMed was performed. RESULTS: Of 156 SPRLC procedures, 98.7% of them were technically successful and 71.8% were without postoperative complications. No postoperative mortality was encountered. Superficial site infection occurred in 14.7%, anastomotic leakage in 3.9% and major complications in 8.3%. Median LOS was 4.0 days (1-69), single-port success rate was 64.7%, 12.8% and 21.2% (33/154) were converted to an open and multiport laparoscopic procedure, respectively. Literature shows equally favorable results in 131 patients divided over 5 cohorts with morbidity ranging from 0 to 30.4% and mortality from 0 to 2.2% and median LOS of 4-8 days. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety, feasibility and favorable results of the use of single-port approach in the reversal of left-sided colostomy in different centers in Europe with laparoscopic experienced colorectal surgeons. The available literature on this topic support and show equally favorable results using single-port laparoscopy for left-sided colostomy reversal surgery.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Surgical Stomas , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Colostomy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(2): 136-145, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397962

ABSTRACT

AIM: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects the quality of life (QoL) of patients after surgery for rectal cancer. There are very few studies that have investigated LARS-like symptoms and their effect on QoL after colon cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of functional abdominal complaints and related QoL after colon cancer surgery compared with patients with similar complaints after rectal cancer surgery. METHOD: All patients who underwent colorectal cancer resections between January 2008 and December 2015, and who were free of colostomy for at least 1 year, were eligible (n = 2136). Bowel function was assessed by the LARS score, QoL by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. QoL was compared between the LARS score categories and tumour height categories. RESULTS: A total of 1495 patients (70.0%) were included in the analyses, of whom 1145 had a colonic and 350 a rectal tumour. Symptoms of LARS were observed in 55% after rectal cancer resection compared with 21% after colon cancer resection. Female gender (OR 1.88, CI 1.392-2.528) and a previous diverting stoma (OR 1.84, CI 1.14-2.97) were independently associated with a higher prevalence of LARS after colon cancer surgery. Patients with LARS after colon cancer surgery performed significantly worse in most QoL domains. CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight the presence of LARS-like symptoms after surgery for colonic cancer. Patients suffering from major LARS-like symptoms after colon resection reported the same debilitating effect on their QoL as patients with major LARS after rectal resection. This should be addressed by colorectal cancer specialists in order to adequately inform patients.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/psychology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colonic Neoplasms/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Defecation , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Prevalence , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Proctectomy/psychology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Syndrome , Treatment Outcome
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(1): 46-52, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31344293

ABSTRACT

AIM: The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects quality of life (QoL) after colorectal cancer surgery. There are no data about these complaints and the association with QoL in a reference population. The aim of this study was to assess LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population. METHODS: Six hundred patients who visited the outpatient clinic because of general or trauma surgical indications were asked to participate in this study. They received an invitation letter containing three validated questionnaires to assess LARS (assessed with the LARS score) and both general [European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30] and colorectal-specific (EORTC QLQ-CR29) QoL. RESULTS: Five hundred and one respondents could be included for the analyses. The median age at inclusion was 68 years and 47.3% were men. Major LARS was observed in 15% of patients (11.4% in men and 18.9% in women, P = 0.021). Women reported more urgency (P = 0.070) and incontinence for both flatus (P < 0.001) and stool (P = 0.063) compared to men. In univariate analyses, women reported major LARS significantly more often than men (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.10-3.01). Patients with major LARS scored significantly worse in most QoL domains compared to patients with no/minor LARS. CONCLUSION: This is the first study demonstrating major LARS and the association with QoL in a reference population of patients without colorectal cancer. Our data can assist in the interpretation of LARS in past and future research about abdominal complaints after colorectal cancer surgery.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/psychology , Colorectal Neoplasms/psychology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Proctectomy/psychology , Quality of Life , Aged , Anal Canal/physiopathology , Anal Canal/surgery , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Defecation , Fecal Incontinence/epidemiology , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Postoperative Period , Prevalence , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Rectal Diseases/epidemiology , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Rectal Diseases/psychology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syndrome
4.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 9(4): 533-541, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34674491

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The number of octogenarians with rectal adenocarcinoma is growing. Current guidelines seem difficult to apply on octogenarians which may result in non-adherence. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to give insight in occurrence of treatment-related complications, hospitalisations and survival among octogenarians treated according to guidelines versus octogenarians treated otherwise. METHODS: 108 octogenarians with rectal adenocarcinoma were identified by screening of medical records. 22 patients were excluded for treatment process analysis because of stage IV disease or unknown stage. Baseline characteristics, diagnostic process, received treatment, motivation for deviation from guidelines, complications, hospitalisations and date of death were documented. Patients were divided in two groups depending on adherence to treatment guidelines. Differences in baseline characteristics, treatment-related complications and survival between both groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Diagnosis and treatment according to guidelines occurred in 95 and 54% of the patients, respectively. When documented, patient's preference and comorbidities were major reasons to deviate from guidelines. 66% of patients who were treated according to guidelines experienced complications versus 34% of those treated otherwise (p = 0.02). After adjustment for differences in age and polypharmacy, this association was not significant. Patients treated according to the guideline had better survival 18 months after diagnosis (80 versus 56%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Treating octogenarians with rectal cancer according to guidelines seem to lead to better overall survival, but may lead to a high risk of complications. This may jeopardise quality of life. More and prospective studies in octogenarians with rectal cancer are needed to customize guidelines for these patients.

5.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 42(3): 347-54, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21481620

ABSTRACT

Cystic adventitial disease (CAD) is a rare cause of unilateral intermittent claudication of unknown aetiology, which is characterized by the formation of multiple mucin-filled cysts in the adventitial layer of the arterial wall resulting in obstruction to blood flow. The disease predominantly presents in young otherwise healthy males and most commonly affects the popliteal artery. CAD can be diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic angiography, or duplex ultrasound. Surgery is the primary mode of treatment, including exarterectomy, or replacement of the affected vascular segment by venous or synthetic interposition graft. Alternatively, the cysts can be drained by percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle aspiration. We provide a literature update on the aetiology and treatment of this uncommon condition and present two cases supporting patient tailored treatment without primary bypass grafting.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery , Adult , Connective Tissue , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/etiology , Male , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Thrombolytic Therapy , Vascular Surgical Procedures
6.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 152(21): 1204-9, 2008 May 24.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18578448

ABSTRACT

* In view of the favourable results of lobectomy with complete 'video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery' (c-VATS) as described in literature, we started to perform these totally endoscopic lung resections in the Netherlands in March 2006. * Essential aspects of the procedure are that the ribs are not spread and that the procedure is performed using the image on the monitor only. * In the 23 c-VATS lobectomies performed, the advantages described in literature were confirmed. The operation was safe and entirely similar to the 'open' thoracotomy in an oncological sense. The effects for the patient were favourable. There was less pain after the operation, the function of the shoulder remained intact and the patients recovered rapidly. * It takes a considerable time before the learning curve reaches the plateau phase. The use of proper instruments is essential. * It is expected that the c-VATS lobectomy will be performed more often in the Netherlands in the coming years.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Thoracoscopy/methods , Humans , Thoracotomy , Treatment Outcome , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...