Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations

Purpose The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Given the lack of prospective data on the management of vulvar carcinoma, this document provides an up-to-date review of radiotherapy treatment in vulvar cancer and a series of consensus-based recommendations from a group of experts. Methods A two-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus treatment recommendations in three clinical settings: 1) adjuvant treatment, 2) locally-advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC), and 3) recurrent disease. After the first round, we comprehensively reviewed the available medical literature from peer-reviewed journals to assess and define the evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. Results The main recommendations were as follows: 1) following surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended with the presence of adverse risk factors (primarily positive margins and lymph node involvement); 2) radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) should be considered in LAVC; and 3) in recurrent disease, radiotherapy should be individualised on a case-by-case basis. A high level of agreement over 80% was reached. Conclusions In the absence of robust clinical data, these final recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer (AU)

Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus technical guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 2: radiotherapy recommendations

Purpose The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). This document provides an up-to-date review of the technical aspects in radiation treatment of vulvar cancer. Methods A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus on the appropriateness of technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Three clinical scenarios were proposed: adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer, radiation treatment of locally advanced vulvar carcinoma and locoregional recurrences. After the first round, an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal was performed to define evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree and strongly disagree. Results The main recommendations on external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, both in adjuvant setting and local advanced disease are summarized. Recommendations include treatment technique, treatment volume, and doses in target and organs at-risk. Taking into consideration the different clinical scenarios of recurrent disease, the radiation treatment should be individualized. Conclusions In the absence of robust clinical data, these recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer (AU)

Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 1: clinical recommendations.

PURPOSE: The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). Given the lack of prospective data on the management of vulvar carcinoma, this document provides an up-to-date review of radiotherapy treatment in vulvar cancer and a series of consensus-based recommendations from a group of experts. METHODS: A two-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus treatment recommendations in three clinical settings: 1) adjuvant treatment, 2) locally-advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC), and 3) recurrent disease. After the first round, we comprehensively reviewed the available medical literature from peer-reviewed journals to assess and define the evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree; strongly disagree. RESULTS: The main recommendations were as follows: 1) following surgical resection, adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended with the presence of adverse risk factors (primarily positive margins and lymph node involvement); 2) radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) should be considered in LAVC; and 3) in recurrent disease, radiotherapy should be individualised on a case-by-case basis. A high level of agreement over 80% was reached. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of robust clinical data, these final recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.

Radiation therapy for vulvar cancer: consensus technical guidelines of the GINECOR working group of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology. Part 2: radiotherapy recommendations.

PURPOSE: The present consensus statement was developed by the GINECOR working group on behalf of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR). This document provides an up-to-date review of the technical aspects in radiation treatment of vulvar cancer. METHODS: A two-round modified Delphi study was conducted to reach consensus on the appropriateness of technical aspects of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Three clinical scenarios were proposed: adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer, radiation treatment of locally advanced vulvar carcinoma and locoregional recurrences. After the first round, an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journal was performed to define evidence-based treatment options. In the second round, participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the preliminary recommendations according to the GRADE (Grade of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria, as follows: strongly agree; agree; neither agree nor disagree; disagree and strongly disagree. RESULTS: The main recommendations on external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy, both in adjuvant setting and local advanced disease are summarized. Recommendations include treatment technique, treatment volume, and doses in target and organs at-risk. Taking into consideration the different clinical scenarios of recurrent disease, the radiation treatment should be individualized. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of robust clinical data, these recommendations may help to select the optimal radiotherapy approach for this relatively rare cancer.

Oligometastases in oncological orthopedic surgery. Our experience. / Oligometástasis en la cirugía ortopédica oncológica. Nuestra experiencia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence and survival of patients with oligometastases (solitary and normal) when they are treated in centers that are experts in multidisciplinary approach to patients with sarcoma. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 414 patients with bone metastases secondary to carcinomas at Hospital Universitario La Paz and Hospital MD Anderson Cancer Center (Madrid) between May 2006 and May 2019. Metastases located in the pelvis and axial skeleton were excluded, analyzing a total of 28 patients who met the criterion for solitary metastases or oligometastases with normal criteria. The study survival estimate was carried out following the Kaplan-Meier statistical method. RESULTS: The survival of the patients following the oligometastases criteria (solitary and normal) was 53%. Breast cancer was the most prevalent and had a survival rate of more than 70%. The average age of the patients was 58 years old. DISCUSSION: Systemic treatments in cancer treatment have managed to improve disease-free survival curves and lead us to redirect on the paradigm for the treatment of oligometastases, stating that treatment should be carried out in the centers that are experts in the treatment of sarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgical treatment for patients with oligometastases in the strict sense (solitary) and normal should be evaluated by multidisciplinary teams according to the prognoses of the patient, anatomical location and histiotype of the neoplasm.

Oligometástasis en la cirugía ortopédica oncológica. Nuestra experiencia / Oligometastases in oncological orthopedic surgery. Our experience

Objetivo: Analizar la incidencia, factores pronósticos, indicación de tratamiento quirúrgico y supervivencia de los pacientes con criterios de oligometástasis óseas con los criterios de solitaria y normal ósea tratados en centros expertos en la resección tumoral de lesiones óseas. Material y método: Análisis retrospectivo de 414 pacientes afectos de metástasis óseas secundarias a carcinomas del Hospital Universitario La Paz y Hospital MD Anderson Cancer Center (Madrid), entre mayo de 2006 y mayo de 2019. Fueron excluidos las metástasis localizadas en pelvis y esqueleto axial, analizándose un total de 28 pacientes que cumplían con el criterio de metástasis solitaria u oligometástasis con criterio normal. La estimación de la supervivencia del estudio se llevó a cabo siguiendo el método estadístico de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados: La supervivencia de los pacientes siguiendo los criterios de oligometástasis (solitaria y normal) fue del 53%. El cáncer de mama fue el más prevalente y presentó una supervivencia superior al 70%. La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 58 años. Discusión: Los tratamientos sistémicos en el tratamiento del cáncer han conseguido mejorar las curvas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y nos lleva a reflexionar sobre el paradigma del tratamiento de las oligometástasis, planteando que el tratamiento debería realizarse en centros expertos en la resección tumoral de lesiones óseas. Conclusiones: La elección del tratamiento quirúrgico de los pacientes afectos de oligometástasis en sentido estricto (solitaria) y normal deben ser evaluada por equipos multidisciplinarios, según el pronóstico del paciente, localización anatómica e histiotipo de la neoplasia. Nivel de evidencia 3.(AU)

Objective: To analyze the incidence and survival of patients with oligometastases (solitary and normal) when they are treated in centers that are experts in multidisciplinary approach to patients with sarcoma. Material and method: Retrospective analysis of 414 patients with bone metastases secondary to carcinomas at Hospital Universitario La Paz and Hospital MD Anderson Cancer Center (Madrid) between May 2006 and May 2019. Metastases located in the pelvis and axial skeleton were excluded, analyzing a total of 28 patients who met the criterion for solitary metastases or oligometastases with normal criteria. The study survival estimate was carried out following the Kaplan–Meier statistical method. Results: The survival of the patients following the oligometastases criteria (solitary and normal) was 53%. Breast cancer was the most prevalent and had a survival rate of more than 70%. The average age of the patients was 58 years old. Discussion: Systemic treatments in cancer treatment have managed to improve disease-free survival curves and lead us to redirect on the paradigm for the treatment of oligometastases, stating that treatment should be carried out in the centers that are experts in the treatment of sarcomas. Conclusions: The choice of surgical treatment for patients with oligometastases in the strict sense (solitary) and normal should be evaluated by multidisciplinary teams according to the prognoses of the patient, anatomical location and histiotype of the neoplasm. Level of evidence 3.(AU)

[Translated article] Oligometastases in oncological orthopaedic surgery. Our experience / Oligometástasis en la cirugía ortopédica oncológica. Nuestra experiencia

Objetivo: Analizar la incidencia, factores pronósticos, indicación de tratamiento quirúrgico y supervivencia de los pacientes con criterios de oligometástasis óseas con los criterios de solitaria y normal ósea tratados en centros expertos en la resección tumoral de lesiones óseas. Material y método: Análisis retrospectivo de 414 pacientes afectos de metástasis óseas secundarias a carcinomas del Hospital Universitario La Paz y Hospital MD Anderson Cancer Center (Madrid), entre mayo de 2006 y mayo de 2019. Fueron excluidos las metástasis localizadas en pelvis y esqueleto axial, analizándose un total de 28 pacientes que cumplían con el criterio de metástasis solitaria u oligometástasis con criterio normal. La estimación de la supervivencia del estudio se llevó a cabo siguiendo el método estadístico de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados: La supervivencia de los pacientes siguiendo los criterios de oligometástasis (solitaria y normal) fue del 53%. El cáncer de mama fue el más prevalente y presentó una supervivencia superior al 70%. La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 58 años. Discusión: Los tratamientos sistémicos en el tratamiento del cáncer han conseguido mejorar las curvas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y nos lleva a reflexionar sobre el paradigma del tratamiento de las oligometástasis, planteando que el tratamiento debería realizarse en centros expertos en la resección tumoral de lesiones óseas. Conclusiones: La elección del tratamiento quirúrgico de los pacientes afectos de oligometástasis en sentido estricto (solitaria) y normal deben ser evaluada por equipos multidisciplinarios, según el pronóstico del paciente, localización anatómica e histiotipo de la neoplasia. Nivel de evidencia 3.(AU)

Objective: To analyze the incidence and survival of patients with oligometastases (solitary and normal) when they are treated in centers that are experts in multidisciplinary approach to patients with sarcoma. Material and method: Retrospective analysis of 414 patients with bone metastases secondary to carcinomas at Hospital Universitario La Paz and Hospital MD Anderson Cancer Center (Madrid) between May 2006 and May 2019. Metastases located in the pelvis and axial skeleton were excluded, analyzing a total of 28 patients who met the criterion for solitary metastases or oligometastases with normal criteria. The study survival estimate was carried out following the Kaplan–Meier statistical method. Results: The survival of the patients following the oligometastases criteria (solitary and normal) was 53%. Breast cancer was the most prevalent and had a survival rate of more than 70%. The average age of the patients was 58 years old. Discussion: Systemic treatments in cancer treatment have managed to improve disease-free survival curves and lead us to redirect on the paradigm for the treatment of oligometastases, stating that treatment should be carried out in the centers that are experts in the treatment of sarcomas. Conclusions: The choice of surgical treatment for patients with oligometastases in the strict sense (solitary) and normal should be evaluated by multidisciplinary teams according to the prognoses of the patient, anatomical location and histiotype of the neoplasm. Level of evidence 3.(AU)